A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Rocuronium Quantification: Comparative Evaluation of Eco-Friendliness, Applicability and Performance

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts MSA
dc.contributor.authorChristine M. El-Maraghy
dc.contributor.authorMohamed M. Abdelmaksoud
dc.contributor.authorSarah R. Abdulhalim
dc.contributor.authorNourhan M. Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorSandy S. Ibrahim
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-20T16:16:41Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-11
dc.descriptionSJR 2025 0.995 Q1 H-Index 88 Subject Area and Category: Chemistry Analytical Chemistry
dc.description.abstractThis review provides a critical evaluation of several analytical methods developed over the last two decades for the quantification of Rocuronium (ROC), either alone or in combination, in different matrices. The existing literature describes various analytical techniques for ROC analysis, such as spectrofluorimetric, electrochemical, chromatographic, capillary electrophoretic, and mass-spectrometric. However, no published study has assessed and compared these methods in terms of their analytical performance, eco-friendliness, sustainability and applicability. This review employs six assessment tools to evaluate the alignment of the reported analytical methods with the principles of Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) and White Analytical Chemistry (WAC). The tools are: Complex modified green analytical procedure index (ComplexMoGAPI) and Analytical GREEnness Metric (AGREE) to evaluate the greenness, Blueness Assessment Graphical Index (BAGI) to assess the applicability of the method (blueness), and Red Analytical Performance Index (RAPI) for the analytical performance (redness). Finally, the Red-Green-Blue model (RGB-12 algorithm) and Multi-Color Assessment (MA) Tool were employed, which provide a unified “whiteness score” which reflects the degree of sustainability of the method. By evaluating the strengths, limitations, eco-friendliness, applicability, innovation, performance and sustainability of the reported methods, this review establishes a novel, comprehensive framework to guide decision-making in analytical method selection and development.
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=23973&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.citationEl-Maraghy, C. M., Abdelmaksoud, M. M., Abdulhalim, S. R., Mohamed, N. M., & Ibrahim, S. S. (2026). A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Rocuronium Quantification: Comparative Evaluation of Eco-Friendliness, Applicability and Performance. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2026.2655911 ‌
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2026.2655911
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2026.2655911
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.msa.edu.eg/handle/123456789/6709
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCritical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry; 2026
dc.subjectRocuronium
dc.subjectanalytical methods
dc.subjectsustainable
dc.subjectgreen
dc.subjectwhite analytical chemistry
dc.titleA Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Rocuronium Quantification: Comparative Evaluation of Eco-Friendliness, Applicability and Performance
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IMG-20231214-WA0000.jpg
Size:
16.8 KB
Format:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
51 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: