ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS’ GOVERNANCE IN THE GCC REGION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RISKBASED FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Series Info

Journal of Governance and Regulation ; Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 254 - 264 , 2025

Abstract

This study measures the risk-taking behaviour of banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Then, it investigates how this risk-taking leads to enhanced financial performance for Islamic banks compared to conventional banks. Our sample includes all locally incorporated 63 chartered banks, including 22 Islamic banks and 41 conventional banks in the six GCC countries for 13 years between 2003 and 2015. We adopt regression analysis, whereas the mean difference test is used to evaluate the variance of performance. The analysis shows that banks’ internal growth significantly determines risk-taking and financial performance. GCC’s Islamic banks are riskier than their conventional counterparts. Two measures of risk have rarely been observed as statistically significant factors for determining the profitability of conventional banks. Ultimately, the category of the bank in the GCC region significantly impacts financial performance as a whole, and therefore, bank policy must be considered. The results provided valuable perceptions to Islamic and conventional banks across the GCC, allowing them to improve their financial performance by considering risk-taking behaviour. It likewise provides information that supports investors, regulators and executive managers in GCC countries. The study’s originality lies in its contribution to GCC nations by presenting a comparative view of the two clusters of banks.

Description

SJR 2024 0.195 Q4 H-Index 12

Citation

Zulfiqar, S., Alqatan, A., Alsaber, A., Al-Sabah, M., Alshammari, T., & El-Halaby, S. (2025). Islamic and conventional banks’ governance in the GCC region: A comparative analysis of risk-based financial performance. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 14(2, special issue), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv14i2siart4

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By