Simultaneous determination of pioglitazone and glimepiride in their pharmaceutical formulations

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorR. Rezk, Mamdouh
dc.contributor.authorM. Riad, Safa'a
dc.contributor.authorY. Mahmoud, Ghada
dc.contributor.authorEl Bayoumi Abdel Aleem, Abdel-Aziz
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-22T07:22:01Z
dc.date.available2020-01-22T07:22:01Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.descriptionMSA Google Scholaren_US
dc.description.abstractTwo sensitive and precise methods were developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of pioglitazone hydrochloride and glimepiride as the bulk drugs and in their pharmaceutical formulations. Among the techniques adopted were chromatography [coupled TLC-densitometry and HPLC].Method I : Densitometric separation of the drugs was performed on aluminum plates precoated with silica gel 60 F254 as the stationary phase and the solvent system consisted of chloroform: toluene: glacial acetic acid: ethanol [4.5:4.5:1:1, v/v/v/v]. Densitometric evaluation of the separated zones was performed at 228 nm and 268 nm. The two drugs were satisfactorily resolved with RF values 0.4and 0.65 for pioglitazone hydrochloride and glimepiride, respectively. The accuracy and reliability of the method was assessed by evaluation of linearity 3-15µg/spot for pioglitazone hydrochloride and 0.1-3 µg/spot for glimepiride, precision (intra-day RSD 1.178% and inter-day RSD 1.152 % for pioglitazone hydrochloride, and intra-day RSD 1.101 % and inter-day RSD 0.999 % for glimepiride), accuracy (99.94 ± 1.30 % for pioglitazone hydrochloride and 100.74 ±1.58 % for glimepiride) and specificity, in accordance with ICH guidelines. Method II: chromatographic separation using a 250 mm x 4.6 mm, i.d. C18Lichrosorb™ 10µm analytical column. The mobile phase consisted of phosphate buffer [pH: 4]: methanol: acetonitrile: triethylamine [40:20:40:0.1, v/v/v/v] The average retention times under the conditions described were 4 minutes for pioglitazone hydrochloride and 7.5 minutes for Glimepiride, accuracy and reliability of the method was assessed by evaluation of linearity 5-175 µg/mL for pioglitazone hydrochloride and 5-30µg/mL for Glimepiride, precision (intra-day RSD 0.295% and inter-day RSD 0.215 % for pioglitazone hydrochloride, and intra-day RSD 0.345 % and inter-day RSD 0.231 % for glimepiride), accuracy (99.80 ± 1.16 % for pioglitazone hydrochloride and 99.47 ±2.07 % for glimepiride) and specificity, in accordance with ICH guidelines.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScholars Research Library, Der Pharma Chemicaen_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=19700188428&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.citation[1] E. Draeger, Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract., 1995, 28, 139. [2] K.D. Tripathi, Essentials of Medical Pharmacology, Jaypee Brothers Medical, New Delhi, India, 1999, 4, 276–83. [3] G. Muller, K.Geisen, Horm.Metab.Res., 1996, 28, 469. [4] H. Eckert, D. Keliner, H. Gantz, Clin. Rep., 1993, 27, 1493. [5] E. Souri, H. Jalalizadeh, S. Saremi, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 2008, 46, 809. [6] P. Sripalakit, P. Neamhom, A. Saraphanchotiwitthaya, J of Chromatogr. B, 2006, 843, 164. [7] L.R. Khabbaz, R. A. Daoud , D. Karam-Sarkis, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 2005, 28, 3255. [8] Y. Song, J.E. Maeng, H.R. Hwang, J.S. Park, B.C. Kim, J.K. Kim, C.K. Kim, J of Chromatogr. B, 2004, 810, 143. [9] D. Jain, S. Jain, D. Jain, M. Amin, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 2008, 46, 501. [10] P. Venkatesh, T. Harisudhan, H. Choudhury, R. Mullangi, N.R. Srinivas, Biomed. Chromatogr., 2006, 20, 1043. [11] B.L. Kolte1, B.B. Raut, A.A. Deo, M.A. Bagool, D.B. Shinde, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 2004, 42, 27. [12] Y.J. Xue, K.C. Turner, J. B. Meeker, J. Pursley, M. Arnold, S. Unger, J. Chromatogr. B, 2003, 795, 215. [13] T. Radhakrishna, D.S. Rao, G.O. Reddy, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2002, 29, 593. [14] K.Yamashita, H. Murakami, T. Okuda, M. Motohashi, J. Chromatogr. B, 1996, 677, 141. [15] W.Z. Zhong, M.G. Williams, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 1996, 14, 465. [16] W.Z. Zhong, D.B. Lakings, J. Chromatogr., 1989, 496, 377. [17] B.L. Kolte, B.B. Raut, A.A. Deo, M.A. Bagool, D.B. Shinde, J. Sep. Sci., 2005, 28, 2076. [18] C. Pistos, M. Koutsopoulou, I. Panderi, Biomed. Chromatogr., 2005, 19, 394. [19] S. Aburuz, J. Millership, J. McElnay, J. Chromatogr. B, 2005, 817, 277. [20] D.B. Wanjari, N.J. Gaikwad, Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2005, 67, 253. [21] N.R. Lad, S.I. Bhoir, I.C. Bhoir, M. Sundaresan, Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2003, 65, 650.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/
dc.identifier.issn0975-413X
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/8JLAj
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScholars Research Library, Der Pharma Chemicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScholars Research Library, Der Pharma Chemica;Volume: 3 Issue: 5 Pages: 176-184
dc.subjectUniversity of Glimepiride; High-performance liquid chromatography; Pioglitazone; Thin layer Chromatographyen_US
dc.titleSimultaneous determination of pioglitazone and glimepiride in their pharmaceutical formulationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_256.png
Size:
6.31 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description:
Faculty Of Pharmacy Research Paper
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2c4e80ccb4705ecab6d364779e19606175b1.pdf
Size:
298.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
51 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: