Comparison of Two Stability-Indicating Chromatographic Methods for the Determination of Mirabegron in Presence of Its Degradation Product
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Series Info
Chromatographia ; Volume 80, pages 99–107 , (2017)
Scientific Journal Rankings
Orcid
Abstract
Mirabegron is a novel β3-adrenoceptor agonist containing an amide group. It was subjected to stress conditions of acidic and alkaline hydrolyses. The hydrolytic degradation product was isolated and its structure was confirmed using mass and IR spectrometry. Two stability-indicating chromatographic methods have been proposed for the determination of mirabegron. TLC method was applied using silica gel as stationary phase and chloroform–methanol–ammonia (9.0:1.0:0.1 by volume) as the mobile phase, and chromatograms were scanned at 250 nm. Accurate determination of the drug was achieved over the concentration range of 2–12 μg per band. In addition, an isocratic HPLC method was developed on Agilent C18 column (150 mm × 4.5 mm I.D., particle size 5 µm) using ethanol-phosphate buffer pH 2.5 (30:70, by volume) as a mobile phase with flow rate of 1 mL min−1.The intact drug was detected at 250 nm with running time less than 5 min. Mirabegron was determined accurately in a concentration range of 1–25 µg mL−1. The proposed chromatographic methods were applied successfully for the assay of mirabegron in pharmaceutical dosage form and both methods were validated as per the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines and statistically compared with a reported gradient HPLC method.
Description
SJR 2025
0.290
Q3
H-Index
77
Subject Area and Category:
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Clinical Biochemistry
Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry
Organic Chemistry
Citation
Yehia, A. M., Sami, I., Riad, S. M., & El-Saharty, Y. S. (2016). Comparison of Two Stability-Indicating Chromatographic Methods for the Determination of Mirabegron in Presence of Its Degradation Product. Chromatographia, 80(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3210-1
