Comparison of Two Stability-Indicating Chromatographic Methods for the Determination of Mirabegron in Presence of Its Degradation Product

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Series Info

Chromatographia ; Volume 80, pages 99–107 , (2017)

Orcid

Abstract

Mirabegron is a novel β3-adrenoceptor agonist containing an amide group. It was subjected to stress conditions of acidic and alkaline hydrolyses. The hydrolytic degradation product was isolated and its structure was confirmed using mass and IR spectrometry. Two stability-indicating chromatographic methods have been proposed for the determination of mirabegron. TLC method was applied using silica gel as stationary phase and chloroform–methanol–ammonia (9.0:1.0:0.1 by volume) as the mobile phase, and chromatograms were scanned at 250 nm. Accurate determination of the drug was achieved over the concentration range of 2–12 μg per band. In addition, an isocratic HPLC method was developed on Agilent C18 column (150 mm × 4.5 mm I.D., particle size 5 µm) using ethanol-phosphate buffer pH 2.5 (30:70, by volume) as a mobile phase with flow rate of 1 mL min−1.The intact drug was detected at 250 nm with running time less than 5 min. Mirabegron was determined accurately in a concentration range of 1–25 µg mL−1. The proposed chromatographic methods were applied successfully for the assay of mirabegron in pharmaceutical dosage form and both methods were validated as per the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines and statistically compared with a reported gradient HPLC method.

Description

SJR 2025 0.290 Q3 H-Index 77 Subject Area and Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Biochemistry Clinical Biochemistry Chemistry Analytical Chemistry Organic Chemistry

Citation

Yehia, A. M., Sami, I., Riad, S. M., & El-Saharty, Y. S. (2016). Comparison of Two Stability-Indicating Chromatographic Methods for the Determination of Mirabegron in Presence of Its Degradation Product. Chromatographia, 80(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3210-1 ‌

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By