Effective Removal of Levofloxacin from Pharmaceutical Wastewater Using Synthesized Zinc Oxid, Graphen Oxid Nanoparticles Compared with their Combination

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

04/03/2020

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type

Article

Publisher

Springer Nature

Series Info

Scientific Reports;10(1)

Abstract

The presence of antibiotic traces in the aquatic system due to the inefficient treatment of the pharmaceutical wastewater represented threats, such as bioaccumulation and antibiotic-resistance, to the environment and human health. Accordingly, for the first time, the current work utilized the photocatalytic degradation and the adsorption approach for Levofloxacin (LEVO) in pharmaceutical wastewater using new designed nano aspects. Therefore, spherical Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONP) sized 17 nm and ultrathin sheet-like structure graphene oxide nanosheets (GONS) with layer thickness ~5 nm were fabricated separately or in a combination between them then characterized via Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transforms Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), absorption spectra (UV-Vis) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET). Additionally, several parameters were investigated to evaluate the potential of the removal process, such as pH, the exposure time to UV radiation, the type and concentration of the nanoparticles (NPs) and the initial concentration of the drug using a mixed fractional factorial design. The most effective parameter for LEVO removal was the NPs type followed by the initial drug concentration. Furthermore, an RP-HPLC/UV method was developed and validated for measuring the percentage of removal for LEVO drug. The highest percentage removal for both 50 and 400 µg mL−1 LEVO was 99.2% and 99.6%, respectively, which was achieved using ZnONP/GONS combination at pH 9 ± 0.05 and UV light exposure time 120 min. In addition, the negative antibacterial activity of the treated wastewater sample confirmed the drug removal. The established protocol was successfully applied on wastewater samples collected from a pharmaceutical company that encouraged researchers to mainstream this design to be applied on other pharmaceutical wastewater drugs

Description

Keywords

university of Pharmaceutical Wastewater, Nanoparticles, Graphen Oxid, Synthesized Zinc

Citation

Kümmerer, K. Signifcance of antibiotics in the environment. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 52(1), 5–7 (2003). 2. Ahmed, M. B. et al. Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from water and wastewater: Progress and challenges. Science of the Total Environment 532, 112–126 (2015).www.nature.com/scientificreports 3. Hirsch, R. et al. Occurrence of antibiotics in the aquatic environment. Science of the Total environment 225(1–2), 109–118 (1999). 4. Kolpin, D. W. et al. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999− 2000: A national reconnaissance. Environmental science & technology 36(6), 1202–1211 (2002). 5. Ashton, D., Hilton, M. & Tomas, K. Investigating the environmental transport of human pharmaceuticals to streams in the United Kingdom. Science of the total environment 333(1–3), 167–184 (2004). 6. Wise, R. et al. Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to public health. British Medical Journal 317, 609–610 (1998). 7. Hooper, D. C. & Rubinstein, E. Quinolone antimicrobial agents. (ASM Press, Washington, D.C, 2003). 8. Hu, J. et al. Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Model for Prediction of Genotoxic Potential for Quinolone Antibacterials. Environmental Science & Technology 41(13), 4806–4812 (2007). 9. Watkinson, A., Murby, E. & Costanzo, S. Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: Implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling. Water Research 41(18), 4164–4176 (2007). 10. Sharma, G. et al. Fabrication and characterization of chitosan-crosslinked-poly (alginic acid) nanohydrogel for adsorptive removal of Cr (VI) metal ion from aqueous medium. International journal of biological macromolecules 95, 484–493 (2017). 11. Naushad, M., Sharma, G. & Alothman, Z. A. Photodegradation of toxic dye using Gum Arabic-crosslinked-poly (acrylamide)/Ni (OH) 2/FeOOH nanocomposites hydrogel. Journal of Cleaner Production 241, 118263 (2019). 12. Sharma, G. et al. Fabrication and characterization of Gum arabic-cl-poly (acrylamide) nanohydrogel for efective adsorption of crystal violet dye. Carbohydrate polymers 202, 444–453 (2018). 13. Göbel, A. et al. Fate of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in diferent wastewater treatment technologies. Science of the Total Environment 372(2–3), 361–371 (2007). 14. Vieno, N. M. et al. Occurrence of pharmaceuticals in river water and their elimination in a pilot-scale drinking water treatment plant. Environmental science & technology 41(14), 5077–5084 (2007). 15. Homem, V. & Santos, L. Degradation and removal methods of antibiotics from aqueous matrices–a review. Journal of environmental management 92(10), 2304–2347 (2011). 16. Kurt, A. et al. Treatment of Antibiotics in Wastewater Using Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs),Physico-Chemical Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery. Croatia: INTECH (2017). 17. Kansal, S. K. et al. Photocatalytic degradation of the antibiotic levofoxacin using highly crystalline TiO2 nanoparticles. New Journal of Chemistry 38(7), 3220–3226 (2014). 18. An, T. et al. Mechanistic Considerations for the Advanced Oxidation Treatment of Fluoroquinolone Pharmaceutical Compounds using TiO2 Heterogeneous Catalysis. Te Journal of Physical Chemistry A 114, 2569–2575 (2010). 19. Sturini, M. et al. Photolytic and photocatalytic degradation of fuoroquinolones in untreated river water under natural sunlight. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 119-120, 32–39 (2012). 20. Kaur, A. & Kansal, S. K. Bi 2 WO 6 nanocuboids: An efcient visible light active photocatalyst for the degradation of levofoxacin drug in aqueous phase. Chemical Engineering Journal 302, 194–203 (2016). 21. Gupta, G. et al. Photocatalytic degradation of levofoxacin in aqueous phase using Ag/AgBr/BiOBr microplates under visible light. Materials Research Bulletin 88, 148–155 (2017). 22. Kaur, A. et al. Visible light driven photocatalytic degradation of fuoroquinolone levofoxacin drug using Ag2O/TiO2 quantum dots: a mechanistic study and degradation pathway. New Journal of Chemistry 41(20), 12079–12090 (2017). 23. Attallah, O. A. et al. Adsorptive Removal of Fluoroquinolones from Water by Pectin-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles: Process Optimization Using a Spectrofuorimetric Assay. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5(1), 133–145 (2017). 24. Li, Q. et al. Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection and microbial control: potential applications and implications. Water research 42(18), 4591–4602 (2008). 25. Qiao, Y. et al. A bench-scale assessment of ozone pre-treatments for landfll leachates. Environmental technology 35(2), 145–153 (2014). 26. Mostafaii, G. et al. Investigation of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Efects on Removal of Total Coliform Bacteria in Activated Sludge Process Efuent of Municipal Wastewater. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 10, 49–55 (2017). 27. Gottschalk, F. et al. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for diferent regions. Environmental science & technology 43(24), 9216–9222 (2009). 28. Sun, T. Y. et al. Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials. Environmental pollution 185, 69–76 (2014). 29. Peng, C. et al. Intracellular imaging with a graphene‐based fuorescent probe. Small 6(15), 1686–1692 (2010). 30. Wei, Y. et al. Multilayered graphene oxide membrane for water treatment: a review. Carbon (2018). 31. Liu, Y. Application of graphene oxide in water treatment. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing (2017). 32. Beek, W. J. et al. Hybrid zinc oxide conjugated polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells. Te Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109(19), 9505–9516 (2005). 33. Pacholski, C., Kornowski, A. & Weller, H. Self‐Assembly of ZnO: From Nanodots to Nanorods. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 41(7), 1188–1191 (2002). 34. Marcano, D. C. et al. Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide. ACS Nano 4(8), 4806–4814 (2010). 35. McAllister, M. J. et al. Single Sheet Functionalized Graphene by Oxidation and Termal Expansion of Graphite. Chemistry of Materials 19(18), 4396–4404 (2007). 36. Kudin, K. N. et al. Raman Spectra of Graphite Oxide and Functionalized Graphene Sheets. Nano Letters 8(1), 36–41 (2008). 37. ICH—International Conference on Harmonization, of Technical Requirements for registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Topic Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Geneva, Switzerland (2005). 38. Kansal, S. K. et al. Photocatalytic degradation of the antibiotic levofoxacin using highly crystalline TiO 2 nanoparticles. New Journal of Chemistry 38(7), 3220–3226 (2014). 39. Dreyer, D. R. et al. Te chemistry of graphene oxide. Chemical society reviews 39(1), 228–240 (2010). 40. Fernandez, T. et al. An ultra-low hydrolysis sol-gel route for titanosilicate xerogels and their characterization. Journal of sol-gel science and technology 41(2), 163–168 (2007). 41. Chen, Y.-L. et al. Zinc oxide/reduced graphene oxide composites and electrochemical capacitance enhanced by homogeneous incorporation of reduced graphene oxide sheets in zinc oxide matrix. Te Journal of Physical Chemistry C 115(5), 2563–2571 (2011). 42. Kumar, H. & Rani, R. Structural and optical characterization of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by microemulsion route. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy 14, 26–36 (2013). 43. Chaiyakun, S. et al. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide nanosheets. Procedia Engineering 32, 759–764 (2012). 44. Oladiran, A. A. & Olabisi, I. A.-M. Synthesis and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles with zinc chloride as zinc source. IOSR Journal of Applied Physics, 2(2) (2013). 45. Sun, X. et al. Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano research 1(3), 203–212 (2008). 46. Mokhbi, Y. et al. Treatment Heterogeneous Photocatalysis; Factors Infuencing the Photocatalytic Degradation by TiO2. Energy Procedia 50, 559–566 (2014). 47. Ahmad, I. et al. Photodegradation of levofoxacin in aqueous and organic solvents: a kinetic study. Acta pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia) 63(2), 223–229 (2013). Raliya, R. et al. Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange dye by pristine titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, and graphene oxide nanostructures and their composites under visible light irradiation. Applied Nanoscience 7(5), 253–259 (2017). 49. Sakthivel, S. et al. Solar photocatalytic degradation of azo dye: comparison of photocatalytic efciency of ZnO and TiO2. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 77(1), 65–82 (2003). 50. Sun, M. et al. Natural biological template for ZnO nanoparticle growth and photocatalytic dye degradation under visible light. RSC Advances 5(103), 84406–84409 (2015). 51. Nguyen-Phan, T.-D. et al. Te role of graphene oxide content on the adsorption-enhanced photocatalysis of titanium dioxide/ graphene oxide composites. Chemical Engineering Journal 170(1), 226–232 (2011).

Full Text link