The ethical intention of marketing students: the role of ethical ideologies, Machiavellianism and gender

Simple item page
dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorRageh Ismail, Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, Bahtiar
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T10:12:15Z
dc.date.available2020-01-21T10:12:15Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.descriptionMSA Google Scholaren_US
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the relationship between ethical ideologies, Machiavellianism, perceived ethical problem, gender and ethical intention. The results from a survey of students in marketing classes from an Australian university branch campus in Malaysia revealed that relativism and Machiavellianism have negative impact on ethical intention of students. However, idealism and perceived ethical problems have positive impacts on their ethical intention. Moreover, the study found that gender is not a determinant of the ethical intentions of students. This study is attempting to improve our understanding of the ethical issues existing in one of the emergent markets (i.e. Malaysia). Additionally, it offers some implications for marketing educators.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21101043376&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.citationBorkowski, S.C., and Y.F. Ugras. 1998. Business students and ethics: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 1117–1127. Article Google Scholar Burton, B.K., and W.H. Hegarty. 1999. Some determinants of student corporate social responsibility orientation. Business and Society 38(2): 188–205. Article Google Scholar Bush, Victoria, Sharon Harris, and Alan Bush. 1997. Establishing ethical boundaries for service providers: a narrative approach. The Journal of Services Marketing 11(4): 265–277. Article Google Scholar Dawson, L. 1995. Women and men, morality and ethics. Business Horizons 38(4): 61–68. Article Google Scholar De George, Richard T. 1987. The status of business ethics: past and future. Journal of Business Ethics 6(3): 201–211. Article Google Scholar Dornoff, R.J. and Tankersley, C.B. 1975. Perceptual differences in market transactions: a source of consumer frustration. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, pp.97–103. Dubinsky, A.J., and B. Loken. 1989. Analyzing ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Business Research 19(2): 83–107. Article Google Scholar Ferrell, O.C., Fraedrich, J. and Ferrell, L. 2002. Business ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases Houghton Mifflin Company Boston. Fletcher, C. 1990. The relationships between candidate personality, self-presentation strategies, and interviewer assessments in selection interviews: an empirical study. Human Relations 43(8): 739–749. Article Google Scholar Ford, R.C., and W.D. Richardson. 1994. Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13(3): 205–221. Article Google Scholar Forsyth, D.R. 1980. A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social psychology 39(1): 175. Article Google Scholar Forsyth, D.R. 1992. Judging the morality of business practices: the influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics 11(5–6): 461–470. Article Google Scholar Gaedeke, R.M., C.A. Kelley, and D.H. Tootelian. 1992. Business students’ perceptions of ethics in marketing. Journal of Education for Business 67(5): 294–299. Article Google Scholar Geiger, M.Z., and B.T. O’Connell. 1999. Accounting student (sic) ethical perceptions: an analysis of training and gender effects. Teaching Business Ethics 2: 371–388. Article Google Scholar Geis, F. and Christie, R. 1970. Overview of experimental research. Studies in Machiavellianism, pp.285–313. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar Harrell, W.A. and Hartnagel, T. 1976. The impact of Machiavellianism and the trustfulness of the victim on laboratory theft. Sociometry, pp.157–165. Hay, D., P.M. Larres, P. Oyelere, and A. Fisher. 2001. The ethical perception of undergraduate students in computer related situations: an analysis of the effects of culture, gender and prior education. Teaching Business Ethics 5: 331–336. Article Google Scholar Hegarty, W.H., and H.P. Sims. 1978. Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: an experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4): 451. Article Google Scholar Hegarty, W.H., and H.P. Sims. 1979. Organizational philosophy, policies, and objectives related to unethical decision behavior: a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 64(3): 331. Article Google Scholar Henle, C.A., R.A. Giacalone, and C.L. Jurkiewicz. 2005. The role of ethical ideology in workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics 56: 219–230. Article Google Scholar Hunt, S.D., and S. Vitell. 1986. A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing 6(1): 5–16. Article Google Scholar Kohlberg, L. 1984. The psychology of moral development. In: Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 2, Harper and Row, San Francisco. Lane, J.C. 1995. Ethics of business students: some marketing perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 14(7): 571–80. Article Google Scholar Loe, T.W., and L. Ferrell. 2001. Teaching marketing ethics in the 21st century. Marketing Education Review 11(2): 1–15. Article Google Scholar Loe, T.W., and W.A. Weeks. 2000. An experimental investigation of efforts to improve sales students’ moral reasoning. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 20(4): 243–251. Google Scholar Machiavelli, N. 1965. Discourses on the first ten books of Titus Livius. Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar Meyer, H.D. 1992. Norms and self-interest in ultimatum bargaining: the prince’s prudence. Journal of Economic Psychology 13: 215–232. Article Google Scholar Mudrack, P.E., J.M. Bloodgood, and W.H. Turnley. 2012. Some ethical implications of individual competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 108: 347–359. Article Google Scholar Mullin Marta, J.K., A. Singhapakdi, A. Attia, and S.J. Vitell. 2004. Some important factors underlying ethical decisions of Middle-Eastern marketers. International Marketing Review 21(1): 53–67. Article Google Scholar Nill, Alexander, and John A. Schibrowsky. 2007. Research on marketing ethics: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Macromarketing 27(3): 256–273. Article Google Scholar Paal, T., and T. Bereczkei. 2007. Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism: the effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences 43: 541–551. Article Google Scholar Reidenbach, R.E., D.P. Robin, and L. Dawson. 1991. An application and extension of a multidimensional ethics scale to selected marketing practices and marketing groups. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19(2): 83–92. Article Google Scholar Roxas, M.L., and Stoneback, J.Y. 2004. The importance of gender across cultures in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics 50(2): 149–165. Ruegger, D., and E.W. King. 1992. A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 11(3): 179–186. Article Google Scholar Schlegelmilch, Bodo B., and Magdalena Oberseder. 2010. Half a century of marketing ethics: shifting perspectives and emerging trends. Journal of Business Ethics 93(1): 1–19. Article Google Scholar Schlenker, B.R., and D.R. Forsyth. 1977. On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13(4): 369–396. Article Google Scholar Shafer, W.E., and R.S. Simmons. 2008. Social responsibility Machiavellianism and tax avoidance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 21: 695–720. H. Article Google Scholar Singhapakdi, A. 2004. Important factors underlying ethical intentions of students: implications for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education 26(3): 261–270. Article Google Scholar Singhapakdi, A., and S.J. Vitell. 1990. Marketing ethics: factors influencing perceptions of ethical problems and alternatives. Journal of Macromarketing 10(1): 4–18. Article Google Scholar Singhapakdi, A., and S.J. Vitell. 1994. Ethical ideologies of future marketers: the relative influences of Machiavelliamsm and gender. Journal of Marketing Education 16(1): 34–42. Article Google Scholar Singhapakdi, A., K.L. Kraft, S.J. Vitell, and K.C. Rallapalli. 1995. The perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility on organizational effectiveness: a survey of marketers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23(1): 49–56. Article Google Scholar Singhapakdi, A., S.J. Vitell, D.J. Lee, A.M. Nisius, and B.Y. Grace. 2013. The influence of love of money and religiosity on ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Business Ethics 114(1): 183–191. Article Google Scholar Sparks, J.R. and Hunt, S.D. 1998. Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation. The Journal of Marketing, pp.92–109. Stylianou, A.C., S. Winter, Y. Niu, R.A. Giacalone, and M. Campbell. 2013. Understanding the behavioral intention to report unethical information technology practices: the role of Machiavellianism, gender, and computer expertise. Journal of Business Ethics 117(2): 333–343. Article Google Scholar Tsalikis, John, and David J. Fritzsche. 1989. Business ethics: a literature review with a focus on marketing ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 8(9): 695–743. Article Google Scholar Vitell, S.J., S.L. Nwachukwu, and J.H. Barnes. 1993. The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: an application of Hofstede’s typology. Journal of Business Ethics 12(10): 753–760. Article Google Scholar Wang, L.C., and L. Calvano. 2015. Is business ethics education effective? An analysis of gender, personal ethical perspectives, and moral judgment. Journal of Business Ethics 126(4): 591–602. Article Google Scholar Whipple, T.W., and D.D. Wolf. 1991. Judgments of marketing students about ethical issues in marketing research: a comparison to marketing practitioners. Journal of Marketing Education 13: 56–63. Spring. Article Google Scholar Yoo, B., and N. Donthu. 2002. The effects of marketing education and individual cultural values on marketing ethics of students. Journal of Marketing Education 24(2): 92–103. Article Google Scholaren_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-016-0030-y
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-016-0030-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/r8pRZ
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Ethics Education;2, pages 67–75(2017)
dc.titleThe ethical intention of marketing students: the role of ethical ideologies, Machiavellianism and genderen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_256.png
Size:
6.31 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description:
Faculty Of Management Sciences Research Paper
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
51 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty Of Management Sciences Research Paper