Improving classical scoring functions using random forest: The non-additivity of free energy terms’ contributions in binding

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2018

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Type

Article

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Series Info

Chemical Biology and Drug Design
92

Abstract

Despite recent efforts to improve the scoring performance of scoring functions, accurately predicting the binding affinity is still a challenging task. Therefore, different approaches were tried to improve the prediction performance of four scoring functions (x-score, vina, autodock, and rf-score) by substituting the linear regression model of classical scoring function by random forest to examine the performance improvement if an additive functional form is not imposed, and by combining different scoring functions into hybrid ones. The datasets were derived from the PDBbind-CN database version 2016. When evaluating the original scoring functions on the generic dataset, rf-score has outperformed classical scoring functions, which shows the superiority of descriptor-based scoring functions. Substituting linear regression as a linear model by random forest as a nonlinear model had largely improved the scoring performance of autodock and vina while x-score had only a slight performance increase. All hybrid scoring functions had only a slight improvement�if any�on both of the combined scoring functions, which is not worth the slower calculation time. � 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S

Description

Scopus

Keywords

autodock, autodock vina, docking, drug design, rf-score, scoring, scoring function, virtual screening, x-score, Article, binding affinity, calculation, data base, energy, hybrid, linear regression analysis, prediction, priority journal, random forest, scoring system, statistical model, chemistry, drug design, entropy, metabolism, molecular docking, ligand, protein, protein binding, Drug Design, Entropy, Ligands, Molecular Docking Simulation, Protein Binding, Proteins

Citation

Full Text link