Regional versus IV analgesics in labor

Simple item page
dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorSweed N.
dc.contributor.authorSabry N.
dc.contributor.authorAzab T.
dc.contributor.authorNour S.
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Pharmacy
dc.contributor.otherMSA University
dc.contributor.other6th October City
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Clinical Pharmacy
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Pharmacy
dc.contributor.otherCairo University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Faculty of Medicine
dc.contributor.otherCairo University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-25T19:58:29Z
dc.date.available2020-01-25T19:58:29Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.descriptionScopus
dc.description.abstractAim. The aim of this study was to compare combined spinal epidural (CSE), epidural (E) and IV pethidine analgesia and their effects on the mother, fetus, newborn and the labor course. Methods. This is a prospective parallel single blind study, where 60 women in active labor were recruited and were allocated to five subgroups to receive analgesia by different routes. The mother and the fetus were assessed. The results were recorded and compared using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and modified Bromage scale for motor block, in addition to other clinical findings. Results. The duration of first stage of labor was significantly longer in the E group, compared with the CSE and IV pethidine groups. When the pain control achieved by CSE bupivacaine and lidocaine was compared with the corresponding epidural, it was found that the first technique achieved better pain control. Women who received pethidine had higher incidence of nausea and vomiting compared to those received CSE or E analgesia. There was no significant difference between the five groups with respect to other side effects. Conclusion. Regional analgesia especially CSE using bupivacaine or lidocaine is a safe effective method for analgesia in labor with relative better efficacy of bupivacaine.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=26687&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/
dc.identifier.issn264806
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/XA1qb
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMinerva Medica
dc.relation.ispartofseries102
dc.subjectAnalgesia, epiduralen_US
dc.subjectDelivery, obstetricen_US
dc.subjectLabor, obstetricen_US
dc.subjectbupivacaineen_US
dc.subjectfentanylen_US
dc.subjectlidocaineen_US
dc.subjectpethidineen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectApgar scoreen_US
dc.subjectarterial pressureen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectclinical assessmenten_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdrowsinessen_US
dc.subjectdrug safetyen_US
dc.subjectepidural anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfetus heart rateen_US
dc.subjectfetus outcomeen_US
dc.subjectfeveren_US
dc.subjectheart rateen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjecthypotensionen_US
dc.subjectintermethod comparisonen_US
dc.subjectintravenous anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectlaboren_US
dc.subjectloading drug doseen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectnauseaen_US
dc.subjectnewborn assessmenten_US
dc.subjectoutcome assessmenten_US
dc.subjectparallel designen_US
dc.subjectprospective studyen_US
dc.subjectpruritusen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectrating scaleen_US
dc.subjectregional anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectsedationen_US
dc.subjectside effecten_US
dc.subjectsingle blind procedureen_US
dc.subjectstatistical significanceen_US
dc.subjectvisual analog scaleen_US
dc.subjectvomitingen_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAnalgesia, Epiduralen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesia, Obstetricalen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesics, Opioiden_US
dc.subjectAnesthetics, Localen_US
dc.subjectBupivacaineen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFentanylen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectInfusions, Intravenousen_US
dc.subjectLabor Stage, Firsten_US
dc.subjectLabor, Obstetricen_US
dc.subjectLidocaineen_US
dc.subjectMeperidineen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Methoden_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleRegional versus IV analgesics in laboren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.isReferencedByBirnbach, D., Advances in labor analgesia (2004) Can J Anesth, 51, pp. R1-R3; Tuckey, J.P., Prout, R.E., Wee, M.Y.K., Prescribing intramuscular opioids for labour analgesia in consultant-led maternity units: A survey of UK practice (2008) International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 17 (1), pp. 3-8. , DOI 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.05.014, PII S0959289X07001240; Ramin, S., Gambling, D., Lucas, M., Sharma, S., Sidawi, J., Lenevo, K., Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labor (1995) Obstet Gynaecol, 86, pp. 783-789; Olofsson, C., Ekblom, A., Ekman-Ordeberg, G., Hjelm, A., Irestedt, L., Lack of analgesic effect of systemically administered morphine or pethidine on labour pain (1996) British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 103 (10), pp. 968-972; Findley, R., Chamberlain, G., ABC of labor care-Relief of pain (1999) BMJ, 318, pp. 927-930; Elbourne, D., Wiseman, R., Types of intramuscular opioids for maternal pain relief in labor (2000) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, pp. 1469-1493; Bricker, L., Lavender, T., Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief: A systematic review (2002) Am J Obstet Gynecol, 186, pp. S94-S109; Hawkins, J.L., Gibbs, C.P., Orleans, M., Martin-Salvaj, G., Beaty, B., Obstetric anesthesia work force survey, 1981 versus 1992 (1997) Anesthesiology, 87 (1), pp. 135-143. , DOI 10.1097/00000542-199707000-00018; Kuczkowski, K., Advances in obstetric anesthesia: Ambulation during labor with CSE analgesia (2004) S Afr J Anesth Analg, 10, pp. 15-18; Sheiner, E., Shoham-Vardi, I., Sheiner, E.K., Press, F., Hackmon-Ram, R., Mazor, M., Katz, M., A comparison between the effectiveness of epidural analgesia and parenteral pethidine during labor (2000) Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 263 (3), pp. 95-98; Yilmaz, B., Kart, C., Kelekci, S., Gokturk, U., Sut, N., Tarlan, N., Meperidine versus valethamate bromide in shortening the duration of active labor (2009) Int J Obstet Gynecol, 107, pp. 126-129; Halpern, S.H., Leighton, B.L., Ohlsson, A., Barrett, J.F.R., Rice, A., Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor. A meta-analysis (1998) Journal of the American Medical Association, 280 (24), pp. 2105-2110. , DOI 10.1001/jama.280.24.2105; Alexander, J.M., Sharma, S.K., McIntire, D.D., Leveno, K.J., Epidural analgesia lengthens the Friedman active phase of labor (2002) Obstetrics and Gynecology, 100 (1), pp. 46-50. , DOI 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02009-4, PII S0029784402020094; Behrens, O., Goeschen, K., Luck, H.-J., Fuchs, A.-R., Effects of lumbar epidural analgesia on prostaglandin F(2alpha) release and oxytocin secretion during labor (1993) Prostaglandins, 45 (3), pp. 285-296. , DOI 10.1016/0090-6980(93)90053-A; Cascio, M., Pygon, B., Bernett, C., Ramanathan, S., Labour analgesia with intrathecal fentanyl decreases maternal stress (1997) Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 44 (6), pp. 605-609; Jain, S., Arya, V.K., Gopalan, S., Jain, V., Analgesic efficacy of intramuscular opioids versus epidural analgesia in labor (2003) International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 83 (1), pp. 19-27. , DOI 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00201-7; Mansoori, S., Adams, S., Cheater, F., Choice of analgesia in labour on neonatal outcomes, delivery and maternal satisfaction with pain relief (2000) Clin Eff Nurs, 4, pp. 11-19; NICE Guidelines on Intrapartum Care (2008) Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies during Childbirth 2007, , London: RCOG Press; Wong, C.A., Scavone, B.M., Peaceman, A.M., McCarthy, R.J., Sullivan, J.T., Diaz, N.T., Yaghmour, E., Grouper, S., The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor (2005) New England Journal of Medicine, 352 (7), pp. 655-665. , DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa042573; Tsen, L.C., Thue, B., Datta, S., Segal, S., Is combined spinal-epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? (1999) Anesthesiology, 91 (4), pp. 920-925. , DOI 10.1097/00000542-199910000-00010; Collis, E., Davies, D., Aveling, W., Randomized comparison of CSE and standard epidural analgesia in labour (1995) Lancet, 345, pp. 1413-1416; Hughes, D., Simmons, S., Brown, J., Cyna, A., CSE versus epidural analgesia in labor (2003) Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4. , CD003401; Thallon, A., Shennan, A., Epidural and spinal analgesia and labor (2001) Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 13, pp. 583-587; Chung, K., Liu, W., Wu, Y., Hui, Y., Painless labor and instrumentation (1990) Ma Zui Xue Za Zhi, 28, pp. 303-306; Zhang, J., Klebanoff, M.A., DerSimonian, R., Epidural analgesia in association with duration of labor and mode of delivery: A quantitative review (1999) American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 180 (4), pp. 970-977. , DOI 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70669-1; O'Sullivan, G., Epidural analgesia and labor (2009) Eur J Pain Supplements, 3, pp. 65-70; Kukulu, K., Demirok, H., Effects of epidural anesthesia on labor progress (2008) Pain Manag Nurs, 9, pp. 10-16; Nageotte, M.P., Larson, D., Rumney, P.J., Sidhu, M., Hollenbach, K., Epidural analgesia compared with combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labor in nulliparous women (1997) New England Journal of Medicine, 337 (24), pp. 1715-1719. , DOI 10.1056/NEJM199712113372402; Dresner, M., Bamber, J., Calow, C., Freeman, J., Charlton, P., Comparison of low dose epidural with CSE for labor (1999) Br J Anaesth, 83, pp. 756-760; Van De, V.M., Mignolet, K., Vandermeersch, E., Van Assche, A., Prospective, randomized comparison of epidural and combined spinal epidural analgesia during labor (1999) Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica, 50 (3), pp. 129-136; Hepner, D., Gaiser, R., Gutsche, B., Comparison of CSE and low dose epidural analgesia (2000) Can J Anaesth, 47, pp. 232-236; Norris, M., Fogel, S., Conway-Long, C., CSE versus epidural labor analgesia (2001) Anesthesiology, 95, pp. 913-920; Leighton, B.L., Halpern, S.H., The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review (2002) American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186 (5 SUPPL.), pp. S69-S77. , DOI 10.1067/mob.2002.121813; Sharma, S.K., Alexander, J.M., Messick, G., Bloom, S.L., McIntire, D.D., Wiley, J., Leveno, K.J., Cesarean delivery: A randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women (2002) Anesthesiology, 96 (3), pp. 546-551. , DOI 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00007; Miro, M., Guasch, E., Gilsanz, F., Comparison of epidural analgesia with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: A retrospective study of 6497 cases (2008) International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 17 (1), pp. 15-19. , DOI 10.1016/j.ijoa.2007.07.003, PII S0959289X0700163X; Pang, D., O'Sullivan, G., Analgesia and anaesthesia in labor (2008) Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Med, 18, pp. 87-92; Vincent, R., Chestnut, D., Choi, W., Ostman, P., Bates, J., Does epidural fentanyl decreases the efficacy of epidural morphine after cesarean delivery? (1992) Anesth Analg, 74, pp. 658-663; Newman, L., Wlodarski, J., Tanck, E., Ivankovich, A., Neither intrathecal sufentanil nor intrathecal sufentanil plus nalbuphine cause hypotension in laboring parturients (1994) Anesthesiology, 81, pp. 3A1153; Cousins, M.J., Mather, L.E., Intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids (1984) Anesthesiology, 61 (3), pp. 276-310; Morgan, M., The rational use of intrathecal and extradural opioids (1989) British Journal of Anaesthesia, 63 (2), pp. 165-188; Vinson, D.C., Thomas, R., Kiser, T., Association between epidural analgesia during labor and fever (1993) Journal of Family Practice, 36 (6), pp. 617-622; Ploeckinger, B., Ulm, M., Chalubinski, K., Gruber, W., Epidural anesthesia in labor: Influence on surgical delivery rates, intrapartum fever and blood loss (1995) Gynecol Obstet Invest, 39, pp. 24-27; Lieberman, E., Lang, J.M., Frigoletto Jr., F., Richardson, D.K., Ringer, S.A., Cohen, A., Epidural analgesia, intrapartum fever, and neonatal sepsis evaluation (1997) Pediatrics, 99 (3), pp. 415-419. , DOI 10.1542/peds.99.3.415; Herbst, A., Wolner, H., Ingemarsson, I., Risk factors for fever in labor (1995) Obstet Gynecol, 86, pp. 790-794; Philip, J., Alexander, J.M., Sharma, S.K., Leveno, K.J., McIntire, D.D., Wiley, J., Epidural analgesia during labor and maternal fever (1999) Anesthesiology, 90 (5), pp. 1271-1275. , DOI 10.1097/00000542-199905000-00008; Mattingly, J.E., D'Alessio, J., Ramanathan, J., Effects of obstetric analgesics and anesthetics on the neonate: A review (2003) Pediatric Drugs, 5 (9), pp. 615-627. , DOI 10.2165/00148581-200305090-00004; Abboud, T.K., Khoo, S.S., Miller, F., Maternal, fetal, and neonatal responses after epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine, 2-chloroprocaine, or lidocaine (1982) Anesthesia and Analgesia, 61 (8), pp. 638-644; Abboud, T.K., Afrasiabi, A., Sarkis, F., Continuous infusion epidural analgesia in parturients receiving bupivacaine, chloroprocaine, or lidocaine. Maternal, fetal, and neonatal effects (1984) Anesthesia and Analgesia, 63 (4), pp. 421-428; Allegri, M., Delazzo, M., Grossi, P., Borghi, B., Efficacy of drugs in regional anesthesia: A review (2009) Eur J Pain Supplements, 3, pp. 41-46; Hess, P.E., Pratt, S.D., Lucas, T.P., Miller, C.G., Corbett, T., Oriol, N., Sarna, M.C., Predictors of breakthrough pain during labor epidural analgesia (2001) Anesthesia and Analgesia, 93 (2), pp. 414-418; Sia, A.T., Camann, W.R., Ocampo, C.E., Goy, R.W., Tan, H.M., Rajammal, S., Neuraxial Block for Labour Analgesia - Is the Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE) Modality a Good Alternative to Conventional Epidural Analgesia? (2003) Singapore Medical Journal, 44 (9), pp. 464-470; Landau, R., Combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labor: Breakthrough or unjustified invasion? (2002) Seminars in Perinatology, 26 (2), pp. 109-121
dcterms.sourceScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_256.png
Size:
6.31 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty Of Pharmacy Research Paper