All you Need to Know About: The Cultivation Theory
Loading...
Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type
Article
Publisher
global journal inc
Series Info
Global Journal of HUMAN-SOCIAL SCIENCE: A Arts & Humanities - Psychology;Volume 15 Issue 8 Version 1.0
Doi
Scientific Journal Rankings
Abstract
the researcher comprehensively examines the cultivation theory.
Conceptualized by George Gerbner in the 1960s and 1970s, the theory has been questioned
with every media technological development. In the last six decades, the mass communication
field witnessed the propagation of cable, satellite, video games and most recently social media.
So far, the theory seems to have survived by continuous adjustment and refinement. Since 2000,
over 125 studies have endorsed the theory, which points out to its ability to adapt to a constantly
changing media environment. This research discusses the theory since its inception, its growth
and expansion, and the future prospects for it. In the first section of the paper, an overview is
given on the premises/founding concepts of the theory. Next is a presentation of the added
components to the theory and their development over the last sex decades including: The
cultivation analysis, the conceptual dimensions, types and measurement of cultivation, and the
occurrence of cultivation across the borders.
Description
Keywords
Cultivation Theory
Citation
Atkin, David J., Kimberly Neuendorf, and Leo W. Jeffres (2001). Expanding the Range of Dependent Measures in Mainstreaming and Cultivation Analysis. Communication Research Reports. Fall 2001. PP 1-10. 2. Bilandzic, HeLena & RÖssler, Patrick (2004). Life According to Television. Implications of Genre- Specific Cultivation Effects: The Gratification/Cultivation Model. Communications. V 29. PP 294-326. 3. Bulck, Jan Van den (2003). Is the Mainstreaming Effect of Cultivation an Artifact of Regression to the Mean? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. V 47. N 2. PP 289-295. 4. Busselle, Rick & Greenberg, Bradely (2000). The Nature of Television Realism Judgments: A Reevaluation of Their Conceptualization and All you Need to Know About: The Cultivation Theory © 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US) Measurement. Mass Communication & Society. V 3. PP 249-268 Realism and Narrative. Communications. V 29. N 3. PP 365-378. 6. Chandler, Daniel (1997). Children’s Understanding of What is‘Real’ on Television: A Review of the Literature. [WWW document] URL http://www.aber. ac.uk/~ dgc/ realrev.html (July10, 2007). 7. Dorr, Aimée (1983). ‘No Shortcuts to Judging Reality’. In Jennings Bryant & Daniel R. Anderson (Eds.). Children’s Understanding of Television: Research on Attention and Comprehension. New York: Academic Press. PP 199-220. 8. Elliot, W.R., Rudd, R.L., &Good, L. (1983). Measuring Perceived Reality of Television: Perceived Plausibility, Perceived Superficiality, and the Degree of Personal Utility. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Convention, Corvallis, OR. 9. Feshbach, Seymour (1972). ‘Reality and Fantasy in Filmed Violence’. In John P. Murray, Eli A. Rubinstein & George A. Comstock (Eds.). Television and Social Behavior 2: Television and Social Learning. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health. PP 318-45. 10. Fitch, Marguerite, Althea C. Huston & John C. Wright (1993). ‘From Televison Forms to Genre Schemata: Children’s Perceptions of Television Reality’. In Gordon L. Berry & Joy Keiko Asamen (Eds.). Children and Television: Images in a Changing Socio-cultural World. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. PP 38-52. 11. Gerbner, Goerge (2002). Advancing on the Path of Righteousness. Against the Mainstream. Ed. Michael Morgan. Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., New York. PP 214-224. 12. Gerbner, Goerge, Gross, Larry, Morgan Michael, & Signorielli, Nancy (2002). Growing up with Televison: The Cultivation Perspective. Against the Mainstream. Ed. Michael Morgan. Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., New York. PP 193-213. 13. Greenberg, Bradley S. & Byron Reeves (1976). ‘Children and the Perceived Reality of Television’, Journal of Social Issues. V 32. N 4. PP 86-97. 14. Hamada, Basyouni (2000). Arab Image in the Minds of Western policy Makers. Egyptian Journal Public Opinion Research. V 1. N 3. PP 1-54. 15. Hawkins, Robert P. (1977). ‘The Dimensional Structure of Children’s Perceptions of Television Reality’. Communication Research. V 4. N 3. PP 299-320. 16. Hetsroni, Amir, Tukachinsky, Riva (2006). Television- World Estimates, Real-World Estimates, and Television Viewing: A New Scheme for Cultivation. Journal of Communication. V 56. PP 133-156. 17. Hodge, Bob & David Tripp (1986). Children and Television: A Semiotic Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press. 18. Howard, Susan M. (1993). ‘How Real is Television? Modality Judgments of Children’, Media Information Australia. V 70 [November]. PP 43-52. 19. Hyung- Jin, Woo and Joseph R. Dominick (2001). Day Time Television Talk Shows and the Cultivation Effect among U.S. and International Students. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. V 45. N 4. PP 598-615. 20. Kelly, Hope (1981). Reasoning About Realities: Children’s Evaluations of Television and Books. In Hope Kelly & Howard Gardner (Eds.). Viewing Children Through Television. New Directions for Child Development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass. PP 59-71. 21. Labeeb, Saad (1985). TV planning in Gulf states. Riyadh, Gulf TV system. Maccawi, Hassan Emad, Laila Hassan El Sayed. Communication and Its Contemporary Theories. Third Edition, Cairo, El Dar El Masreya El Lubnaneya. 22. MD Lett, AL DiPietro, DI Johnson (2004). Examining Effects of Television News Violence on College Students through Cultivation Theory. Communication Research Reports, V 21. N 1. PP 39- 46. 23. Miller, Katherine (2002). Communication Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Contexts, USA: McGraw-Hill inc. 24. Morgan, Michael (2002). On George Gerbner's Contributions to Communication Theory, Research, and Social Action. Against the Mainstream. Ed. Michael Morgan. Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., New York. PP 1-19. 25. Morison, Patricia, Hope Kelly & Howard Gardner (1981). ‘Reasoning about the Realities on Television: A Developmental Study’. Journal of Broadcasting. V 25. N3. P 236. 26. Nielsen (2011, June 15). Cross Platform Report Americans Watching More TV, Mobile and Web Video. Retrieved August 3, 2014 from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2011/cr oss-platform-report-americans-watching-more-tvmobile- and-web-video.html 27. Nielsen (2013, July 10). Nielsen Launches 'Nielsen Twitter TV Ratings'. Retrieved August 4,2014 from http://www.nielsen.com/eg/en/pressroom/ 2013/nielsen-launches-nielsen-twitter-tvratings. html 28. Potter, W. James (1984). Elaborating the Relationship between TV Viewing and Beliefs about the Real World: Possible Contingent Variables. The Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Annual Meeting. Gainesville, FL. PP 1-32. All you Need to Know About: The Cultivation Theory © 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US) Volume XV Issue VIII Version I 36 (A ) Global Journal of Human Social Science - Year 2015 29. Potter, W. James (1988). Perceived Reality in Television Effects Research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. V 32. N 1. PP 23-41 30. Potter, W. James (2005). Media Gravitation Theory. International communication Association. Annual Meeting, New York, NY. PP 1-33. 31. Potter, W. James, Chang, Ik Chin (1990). Television Exposure Measures and the Cultivation Hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, V 34. N 3. PP 313-33. 32. Reeves, B. (1978). Perceived Reality as a Predictor of Children's Social Behavior. Journalism Quarterly. V 55. PP 682-695. 33. Roskos-Ewoldsen, Beverly, Davies, John, & Roskos- Ewoldsen, David (2004). "Implications of the Mental Models Approach for Cultivation Theory." Communications. V 29. PP 345-363. 34. Shanahan, James (2004). A Return to Cultural Indicators. Communications. V 29. PP 277-294. 35. Shanahan, James & Michael Morgan (1999). Television and its Viewers: Cultivation Research and Theory. Cambridge University Press. 36. Shrum L.J. (2004). The Cognitive Processes Underlying Cultivation Effects are a Function of Whether the Judgments are On-line or Memorybased. Communications. V 29. N 3. PP 327-344. 37. Stanley, J. Baran, Dennis K. Davis (2003). Mass communication Theory: Foundations, Ferment, and Future. 3rd ed. Canada: Wadsworth. 38. Wallace-Wells, Benjamin (2014, July 20). ‘Telegenically Dead Palestinians’: Why Israel Is Losing the American Media War. New York Magazine. Retrieved August 4, 2014 from http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/07/whyisrael- is-losing-the-american-media-war.html 39. Williams, Dmitri (2006). Virtual Cultivation: Online Worlds, Offline Perceptions. Journal of Communication V 56. N 1. PP 69-87. 40. Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Srull, T. K. ( 1981 ). Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Hillsdale,