Antimicrobial activities against biofilm formed by Proteus mirabilis isolates from wound and urinary tract infections

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorWasfi R.
dc.contributor.authorAbd El-Rahman O.A.
dc.contributor.authorMansour L.E.
dc.contributor.authorHanora A.S.
dc.contributor.authorHashem A.M.
dc.contributor.authorAshour M.S.
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Microbiology
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Pharmacy
dc.contributor.otherUniversity for Modern Sciences and Arts
dc.contributor.otherGiza
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Department of Microbiology and Immunology
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Pharmacy
dc.contributor.otherAl-Azhar University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Department of Microbiology and Immunology
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Pharmacy
dc.contributor.otherSuez Canal University
dc.contributor.otherIsmailia
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Department of Microbiology and Immunology
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Pharmacy
dc.contributor.otherCairo University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-25T19:58:28Z
dc.date.available2020-01-25T19:58:28Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.descriptionScopus
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bacterial species are capable of living as biofilm and/or planktonic forms. There is increasing evidence for the role of bacterial biofilm in various wound and urinary tract infections (UTIs). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of the bacteria, isolated from urinary tract infections (UTIs) and wound infections, to form biofilm and correlate the role of biofilm with their antimicrobial resistance. Materials and Methods: All the isolated bacteria were screened for their ability to form biofilm using the microtitre plate method. Results: Wound isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacter sp. had more biofilm forming capacity than the UTI isolates. Proteus mirabilis isolates were among the strongest biofilm forming bacteria and were chosen for antimicrobial study. In sub-MIC concentrations of antimicrobial agents used, ciprofloxacin was found to be the most effective in decreasing biofilm formation. On the other hand, ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin were effective in partial removal of preformed biofilm biomass. Conclusion: Ciprofloxacin was more effective in killing bacterial cells especially at high antimicrobial concentrations that could be reached in urine levels and can be used in impregenating catheters.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=20831&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.93044
dc.identifier.doiPubMed ID 22361765
dc.identifier.issn2550857
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.93044
dc.identifier.otherPubMed ID 22361765
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/kNqg9
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIndian Journal of Medical Microbiology
dc.relation.ispartofseries30
dc.subjectAntimicrobial agentsen_US
dc.subjectbiofilmen_US
dc.subjectProteus mirabilisen_US
dc.subjectwound and urinary tract infectionsen_US
dc.subjectamoxicillinen_US
dc.subjectceftriaxoneen_US
dc.subjectchloramphenicolen_US
dc.subjectciprofloxacinen_US
dc.subjectcotrimoxazoleen_US
dc.subjecterythromycinen_US
dc.subjectgentamicinen_US
dc.subjectnitrofurantoinen_US
dc.subjectantibiotic resistanceen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectbactericidal activityen_US
dc.subjectbacterium isolateen_US
dc.subjectbiofilmen_US
dc.subjectnonhumanen_US
dc.subjectProteus mirabilisen_US
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agentsen_US
dc.subjectBiofilmsen_US
dc.subjectDrug Resistance, Bacterialen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMicrobial Sensitivity Testsen_US
dc.subjectMicrobial Viabilityen_US
dc.subjectProteus Infectionsen_US
dc.subjectProteus mirabilisen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Tract Infectionsen_US
dc.subjectWound Infectionen_US
dc.titleAntimicrobial activities against biofilm formed by Proteus mirabilis isolates from wound and urinary tract infectionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.isReferencedByCosterton, J.W., Stewart, P.S., Greenberg, E.P., Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections (1999) Science, 284, pp. 1318-1322; Olson, M.E., Ceri, H., Morck, D.W., Buret, A.G., Read, R.R., Biofilm bacteria: Formation and comparative susceptibility to antibiotics (2002) Can J Vet Res, 66, pp. 86-92; Mahon, C.R., Manuselis, C.R., (2007) Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, , 2nd ed. Philadelphia: aunders Elsevier; O'Toole, G.A., Pratt, L.A., Watnick, P.I., Newman, D.K., Weaver, V.B., Kolter, R., Genetic approaches to study of biofilms (1999) Methods Enzymol, 310, pp. 91-109; (2000) Approved Standard M7-A5, , National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically th ed. Wayne, PA; Yassien, M., Khardori, N., Biofilms formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis. modulation by fluoroquinolones (2004) Egypt J Biomed Sci, 16, pp. 1-20; Moskowitz, S.M., Foster, J.M., Emerson, J., Burns, L., Clinically feasible biofilm susceptibility assay for isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with cystic fibrosis (2004) J Clin Microbiol, 42, pp. 1915-1922; Ruzicka, F., Hola, V., Votava, M., Tejkalova, R., Horvath, R., Heroldov, M., Biofilm detection and the clinical significance of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates (2004) Folia Microbiol, 49, pp. 596-600; Smith, K., Perez, A., Ramage, G., Lappin, D., Gemmell, C.G., Lang, S., Biofilm formation by Scottish clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (2008) J Med Microbiol, 57, pp. 1018-1023; Duran, N., Dogramaci, Y., Ozer, B., Demir, C., Kalaci, A., Detection of adhesin genes and slime production among Staphylococci in orthopaedic surgical wounds (2010) Afr J Microbiol Res, 4, pp. 708-715; Rumbaugh, K.P., Griswold, J.A., Hamood, A.N., Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains obtained from patients with tracheal, urinary tract and wound infection: Variations in virulence factors and virulence genes (1999) J Hosp Infect, 43, pp. 211-218; El-Feky, M.A., El-Rehewy, M.S., Hassan, M.A., AboLella, H.A., Abd El-Baky, R.M., Gad, G.F., Effect of ciprofloxacin and N-acetyl cystein on bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on uretral stent (2009) Pol J Microbiol, 58, pp. 261-267; Spoering, A.L., Lewis, K., Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by Antimicrobials (2001) J Bacteriol, 183, pp. 6746-6751; Aiassa, V., Barnes, A.I., Albesa, I., Resistance to ciprofloxacin by enhancement of antioxidant defenses in biofilm and planktonic Proteus mirabilis (2010) Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 393, pp. 84-88
dcterms.sourceScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_256.png
Size:
6.31 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description: