Short tandem repeat typing technologies used in paternity testing: a case study

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorAbdel Hakim Mousa, Amany
dc.contributor.authorMohamed Naguib Abdel Moawed, Dena
dc.contributor.authorMohamed Abdallah Elberry, Adel
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-27T08:39:33Z
dc.date.available2020-06-27T08:39:33Z
dc.date.issued2020-04
dc.descriptionMSA GOOGLE SCHOLARen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: In forensic field, for establishing the paternity of disputed offspring, STR typing (autosomal, and Y typing) are commonly used to dissolve the cases. Short tandem repeat (STR) technology is used to evaluate specific regions (loci) within nuclear DNA. Variability in STR regions can be used to distinguish one DNA profile from another. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) uses a standard set of 13 specific STR regions for CODIS. Aim of the study: The present work was done to find out the biological father of child in a case where mother was killed by her husband for the doubt of her pregnancy. Methods: After taking blood samples from the murdered mother, the baby and the killer husband, Autosomal STRs Using AmpFlSTR Identifiler Plus PCR Amplification Kit and Y-STR analysis using AmpFlSTR Yfiler PCR Amplification Kit were done to solve the disputed paternity case. Results: After the analysis of DNA STRs profiles of autosomal and Y-chromosome markers, the dead fetus was proved to be the son of the killer father. Conclusions: Autosomal STR multiplex analysis combined with Y-STR analysis help to reach a conclusion in disputed paternity cases with greater confidence.en_US
dc.identifier.citation. Alshamali F, Alkhayat AQ, Budowleb B, et al. 2004. Y chromosome in forensic casework and paternity testing. International Congress Series. 1261: 353-356. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2VLleVd 13. Burgarella C, Navascues M. 2010. Mutation rate estimates for 110 Y-chromosome STRs combining population and father-son pair data. Eur J Hum Genet. 19: 70-75. Ref.: https://bit.ly/3avZnXq 14.Vanek D, Saskova L, Koch H. 2009. Kinship and Y-chromosome analysis of 7th century human remains: novel DNA extraction and typing procedure for ancient material. Croat Med J. 50: 286-295. Ref.: https://bit.ly/3eGefW8 15. Ge J, Eisenberg A, Budowle B. 2012. Developing criteria and data to determine best options for expanding the core CODIS loci. Investig Genet. 3: 1. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2yvocVU 16. Ge J, Sun H, Li H, et al. 2014. Future directions of forensic DNA databases. Croat Med J. 55:163-166. Ref.: https://bit.ly/3aqhVrU Okamoto O, Yamamoto Y, Inagaki S, et al. 2003. Analysis of Short Tandem Repeat (STR) Polym orphisms by the PowerPlex 16 Systemen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.36811/ijfs.2020.110012
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.36811/ijfs.2020.110012
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/AVQ1
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIJFSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInstant Journal of Forensic Science;: April-2020: Page No: 04-09
dc.subjectDisputeden_US
dc.subjectPaternityen_US
dc.subjectMultiplexen_US
dc.subjectShort tandem repratsen_US
dc.subjectY-STRen_US
dc.subjectAnalysisen_US
dc.titleShort tandem repeat typing technologies used in paternity testing: a case studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files