Using NPK nanoparticles in multiplication and micro-tuber process of two potato variety (Solanum tuberosum L.) by using tissue culture techniques
Loading...
Date
2017
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type
Article
Publisher
http://www.sciencepub.net - 39-06 Main Street, #202, Flushing, NY 11354, USA, 718-404-5362; 347-321-7172.
Series Info
World Rural Observations;Volume: 9 Issue: 2 Pages: 86-92
Scientific Journal Rankings
Abstract
Micro-tubers which are produced in tissue culture have benefits for disease free potato production. The
effects of NPK nano-particles on in vitro micro-propagation of two potato variety (Solanum tuberosum L.) were
evaluated. In the present study nodal explants of potato cultivars (Sponta and Seylon) were cultured on MS basal
medium supplemented with different NPK ( 9: 0: 6 + 1 Silver ) Nano particles (control, 10 ml, 20 ml, 30 ml, 40 ml,
and 50 ml).. Analysis control (30 ml) exhibited highest number of nodes (4.0) followed by analysis control 10 ml, 20
ml and 40 ml (3.0) in Seylon Variety. While, Analysis control (30 ml) exhibited highest number of nodes (5.0)
followed by analysis control 10 ml and 20 ml (4.0) in Sponta Variety. The highest number of micro-tuber was
observed in treatment 20 ml (6) followed by treatment 10 ml, and 30 ml (4) in Seylon Variety. The highest number
of micro-tuber were observed in treatment 30 ml (10) followed by treatment 40 ml, 20 ml, and 50 ml (8, 6, 6) in
Sponta Variety.
Description
MSA Google Scholar
Keywords
University of Potato cultivars, In Vitro propagation, multiplication.micro-tuberization, NPK nano-particle
Citation
1. Amina Kanwal, A. A. and Shoaib, K. 2006. In vitro microtuberization of potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) cultivar Kuroda-a new variety in Pakistan. International J. Agriculture and Biol. 8: 337-340. 2. Baciu A, Oana D, Adriana P, Sarac I, Liiza M (2007). Results regarding potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) cultivars reaction to in vitro culture conditions. Ro J Morph and Embryo 48: 174-178. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 control 10 ml 20 ml 30 ml 40 ml 50 ml number of microtuber Treatments Chart 4: The effect of treatment of NPK nanoparticles on the number of microtuber production of Sponta variety in vitro Number of micro-tuber World Rural Observations 2017;9(2) http://www.sciencepub.net/rural 92 3. Behera S. K., Panda R. K.: Integrated management of irrigation water and fertilizers for wheat crop using field experiments and simulation modeling. Agricul-tural Water Management, 96, 1532–1540 (2009). DOI: 10.1016/j. agwat.2009.06.016. 4. Dobranszki, J. and M. Mandis, 1993. Induction of in vitro tuberization by short day period and dark treatment of potato shoot grown on hormone free medium. Acta Biol. Hungarica, 44: 411–20. 5. FAOSTAT Agriculture (2012). FAO statistical database. http://www. fao. org/corp/statistics/en/ read on 29.09.2012. 6. Gu Y. F., Zhang Z. P., Tu S. H., Lindström K.: Soil microbial biomass, crop yields, and bacterial commu-nity structure as affected by long-term fertilizer treat-ments under wheat-rice cropping. European Journal of Soil Biology, 45, 239–246 (2009). DOI: 10.1016/j. ejsobi.2009.02.005. 7. Journal, I., & Farming, H. (2012). In Vitro Micropropagation and Micro-tuberization Potential of Selected Potato Varieties, 25(2), 14– 17. 8. Kaur, M., Kaur, R., Sharma, C., Kaur, N., & Kaur, A. (2015). Effect of growth regulators on micropropagation of potato cultivars. International Scholars Journals, 3(5), 162–164. 9. Kefi, S., Pavlista, A. D., Meagher, M. M. and Read, P. E. (2000b). Invertase activity as affected by cytokinin like compounds during potato tuberization In Vitro. Am. J. Potato Res. 77: 57- 61. 10. Kiji, K., R. Yamamota, K. Tomohide, S. Nakata and P. Kazuo, 1997. Effect of BA and CCC on microtubers. Pl. Cell Rep., 66: 663–8. 11. Liljana KG, Mitrev S, Fidanka T, Mite I (2012). Micropropagation of Potato- Solanumtuberosum L. Electr. J. Biol. 8(3): 45-49. 12. Mandal K. G., Hati K. M., Misra A. K.: Biomass yield and energy analysis of soybean production in relation to fertilizer-NPK and organic manure. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 1670–1679 (2009). DOI: 10.1016/j. biombioe.2009.08.010. 13. McCown, B.H. and P.J. Joyce, 1991. Automated propagation of microtubers of potato. In: Vasil, I.K. (ed.), Scale-up and Automation in Plant Propagation, Pp: 95–109. Academic Press, San Diego. 14. Murashige T, Skoog TF (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiolgia Plantarum, 15: 473-479. 15. Myeong, C., S. Yien, Y.E. Park, K.J. Kim, H.M. Cho and H.B. Hann, 1990. Studies on seed potato influences of several factors on in vitro tuberization of shoot nodes in potato c.v. Dejima. Res. Dep. Rural Dev. Adm., (Shweon). 3: 46–53. 16. Naresh K, Sen D, Singh V, Kumar S (2011). Effect of growing media on rooting and growth of Patchouli (Pogostemoncablin) cuttings in subtropical humid region of Arunachal Pradesh. Environ Ecol 29: 567-569. 17. Pelacho, A.M., L. Marti-Closas and J.L.I. Sanfeliu, 1999. In vitro induction of potato tuberization by organic acids. Pot. Res., 42: 585– 91. 18. Rai R, Diengdoh LC, Srivastava AK, Bag TK (2012). Efficiency of different nodal segments for potato micro-propagation. Environ Ecol 30(3): 594-597. 19. Ranalli, P., Bassi, F., Ruaro, G., Del Re, P., Dicandilo, M. and Mandolino, G. (1994). Microtuber and minituber production and field performance compared with normal tubers. Potato Res 37: 383–391. 20. Roca, W. M., Bryan, J. E. and Roca, M. R. (1979). Tissue culture for international transfer of potato genetic resources. Am. Potato. J. 56: 1– 10. 21. Shukla G, Chakrabarti S, Dey AN (2007). Effect of growing media on germination and initial seedling growth of Albizziaprocera (Roxb.) Benth. interai zone of West Bengal. Environ Ecol 25: 406-407. 22. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1980). "Statistical Methods". Oxford and J.B.H. Publishing Co., 6th edition. 507pp. 23. Venter, S.L. and P.J. Steyn, 1997. Optimization of in vitro production of potato. Vegetable and Ornamental Plant Ins., South Africa, 11: 43–8.