An approach to quantifying social justice in selected developing countries

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorHelmy H.E.
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Economics
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Management Sciences
dc.contributor.otherModern Sciences and Arts University (MSA)
dc.contributor.other6th of October City
dc.contributor.otherEgypt
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T20:42:25Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T20:42:25Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.descriptionScopus
dc.description.abstractPurpose The objective of this paper is to prove that any attempt to implement social justice in its present undefined form is unattainable, and to successfully achieve social justice, the term should be quantified by an appropriate index; accordingly, the first objective of this paper is to make an attempt to construct an appropriate social justice index. The second objective is to quantify this index for a number of developing countries so that a government with low value of social justice index can make policy for achieving an appropriate level of social justice. Design/methodology/approach � The paper constructs a new composite index for social justice for 40 mostly developing countries by selecting six subindicators, each of which represents one aspect or dimension of social justice. The values of the subindicators are then normalized and the final composite index is formed from the weighted average of the subindicators. Findings � The study quantified the levels of social justice in developing countries through a new social justice index and compared the ranking of some developing countries using the new index. The index also helped in identifying areas of social justice that need improvement and hence can improve the developing countries' scores in the social justice index. Originality/value � The paper is valuable to policy makers in developing countries especially the Arab Spring countries in their pursuit for achieving social justice. Quantifying social justice clarifies exactly where such countries stand and the dimensions of social justice that need urgent action to improve their performance and thus their index scores. 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21100780473&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/14468951311322127
dc.identifier.doiPubMed ID :
dc.identifier.issn14468956
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1108/14468951311322127
dc.identifier.otherPubMed ID :
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/pBgwb
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Development Issues
dc.relation.ispartofseries12
dc.subjectComposite indexen_US
dc.subjectDeveloping countriesen_US
dc.subjectDevelopmenten_US
dc.subjectIndicatorsen_US
dc.subjectSen's capabilitiesen_US
dc.subjectSocial justiceen_US
dc.titleAn approach to quantifying social justice in selected developing countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.isReferencedBy(2011) Social justice in the OECD � how do member states compare?, , www.sgi-network.org/, Sustainable Governance Indicators 2011; Clark, H., Family planning is a matter of social justice (2012) The Statesman; (2012) World Economic Outlook Database 2012, , www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/01/weodata/index.aspx, : International Monetary Fund; Kleine, D., ICT4What? Using the choice framework to operationalize the capability approach to development (2010) Journal of International Development, 22 (5), pp. 674-692; Merkel, W., Heiko, G., Measuring social justice and sustainable governance in the OECD (2009) Sustainable Governance Indicators 2009: Policy Performance and Executive Capacity in the OECD, , Bertelsmann Stiftungand (Ed.), Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gutersloh; Mill, J.S., (1860) On Liberty, , www.constitution.org/jsm/liberty.htm; Mill, J.S., (1869) The Subjection of Women, , www.pgdp.net; Mill, J.S., (1879) Utilitarianism, , www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/jsmill/Utilitarianism.pdf, A Penn State Electronic Classics Series Publication; Naussbaum, M., Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice (2003) Feminist Economics, 9 (2-3), pp. 33-59; Rawls, J., (1999) Theory of Justice, , Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; Robeyns, I., Sen's capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities (2003) Feminist Economics, 9 (2-3), pp. 61-92; Rousseau, J., (1762) Du Contrat Social (The Social Contract), , Chez M.M. Rey, Amsterdam; Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators (2005) Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 168 (2), pp. 307-322; Sen, A., (1985) Commodities and Capabilities, , Reprinted in 1999.Oxford University Press, Delhi; Sen, A., (1987) The Standard of Living, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; Sen, A., (1992) Inequality Reexamined, , Oxford University Press, Oxford; Sen, A., Capability and well-being (1993) The Quality of Life, , Nussbaum, M., Sen, A. and (Eds), Clarendon Press, Oxford; Sen, A., Gender inequality and theories of justice (1995) Women, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities, , Nussbaum, M., Glover, J. and (Eds), Clarendon Press, Oxford; Sen, A., Human rights and capabilities (2005) Journal of Human Development, 6 (2), p. 151
dcterms.sourceScopus
dcterms.subjectجامعة أكتوبر للعلوم الحديثة والآداب
dcterms.subjectMSA University
dcterms.subjectUniversity for Modern Sciences and Arts
dcterms.subjectOctober University for Modern Sciences and Arts

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_256.png
Size:
6.31 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description: