Immediate versus early loading of mini-implants supporting mandibular overdentures: A preliminary 3-year clinical outcome report

Simple item page
dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorMaryod W.H.
dc.contributor.authorAli S.M.
dc.contributor.authorShawky A.F.
dc.contributor.otherModern Science and Arts University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Faculty of Dentistry
dc.contributor.other6 October University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T20:42:10Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T20:42:10Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.descriptionScopus
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this preliminary clinical report was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of immediate and early loaded mini-implants (MIs) supporting mandibular overdentures. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six completely edentulous patients (20 men and 16 women) complaining of insufficient retention of their mandibular dentures were randomly assigned to two groups. Each patient received four MIs in the interforaminal area of the mandible using the nonsubmerged flapless surgical approach. In group 1 (G1), MIs were loaded with mandibular overdentures using the immediate loading protocol, while in group 2 (G2), MIs were loaded with overdentures using the early loading protocol. The cumulative survival rate was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Peri-implant health indices (Plaque Index/Bleeding Index), probing depths, and marginal bone levels were recorded for both groups after MI insertions and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months thereafter. Results: The cumulative implant survival rates were 91.7% and 96.7% for G1 and G2, respectively. G1 recorded significantly higher Plaque Index, Bleeding Index, and probing depths than G2 after 12 months, while other observation times demonstrated no significant difference between groups. Most of the recorded marginal bone loss occurred in the first year, and no significant bone loss was noted in subsequent years. After 6 months, marginal bone loss was significantly higher in G1 compared to G2, but no significant differences between groups were noted thereafter. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study's research design and duration of follow-up outcome analyses, immediate and early loading protocols showed good clinical results with favorable peri-implant tissue response 3 years after implant insertion. Early loading of MIs supporting a mandibular overdenture appears to be preferable to immediate loading. � 2014 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=25637&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3845
dc.identifier.doiPubMed ID : 25390870
dc.identifier.issn8932174
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3845
dc.identifier.otherPubMed ID : 25390870
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/XAAJO
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co. Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Prosthodontics
dc.relation.ispartofseries27
dc.subjecttooth implanten_US
dc.subjectalveolar bone lossen_US
dc.subjectclassificationen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectcomplete lower dentureen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdentureen_US
dc.subjectdevicesen_US
dc.subjectelectronicsen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfollow upen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectoverlay dentureen_US
dc.subjectperiodontal pocketen_US
dc.subjectperiodonticsen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectsurvivalen_US
dc.subjecttooth implanten_US
dc.subjecttooth implantationen_US
dc.subjecttooth plaqueen_US
dc.subjecttooth prosthesisen_US
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectAlveolar Bone Lossen_US
dc.subjectDental Implantsen_US
dc.subjectDental Plaque Indexen_US
dc.subjectDental Prosthesis, Implant-Supporteden_US
dc.subjectDenture Retentionen_US
dc.subjectDenture, Complete, Loweren_US
dc.subjectDenture, Overlayen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectImmediate Dental Implant Loadingen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectMiniaturizationen_US
dc.subjectPeriodontal Indexen_US
dc.subjectPeriodontal Pocketen_US
dc.subjectSurvival Analysisen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.titleImmediate versus early loading of mini-implants supporting mandibular overdentures: A preliminary 3-year clinical outcome reporten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.isReferencedByAttard, N.J., Zarb, G.A., Immediate and early implant loading protocols: A literature review of clinical studies (2005) J Prosthet Dent, 94, pp. 242-258; Ahn, M.R., An, K.M., Choi, J.H., Sohn, D.S., Immediate loading with mini dental implants in the fully edentulous mandible (2004) Implant Dent, 13, pp. 367-372; El Attar, M.S., El Shazly, D., Osman, S., El Domiati, S., Salloum, M.G., Study of the effect of using mini-transitional implants as temporary abutments in implant overdenture cases (1999) Implant Dent, 8, pp. 152-158; Scepanovic, M., Calvo-Guirado, J.L., Markovic, A., A 1-year prospective cohort study on mandibular overdentures retained by mini dental implants (2012) Eur J Oral Implantol, 5, pp. 367-379; Bulard, R.A., Vance, J.B., Multi-clinic evaluation using minidental implants for long-term denture stabilization: A preliminary biometric evaluation (2005) Compend Contin Educ Dent, 26, pp. 892-897; Griffitts, T.M., Collins, C.P., Collins, P.C., Mini dental implants: An adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient (2005) Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 100, pp. e81-e84; Jofre, J., Hamada, T., Nishimura, M., Klattenhoff, C., The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of mini-implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: A randomized controlled trial (2010) Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp. 243-249; Shatkin, T.E., Shatkin, S., Oppenheimer, B.D., Oppenheimer, A.J., Mini dental implants for long-term fixed and removable prosthetics: A retrospective analysis of 2514 implants placed over a five-year period (2007) Compend Contin Educ Dent, 28, pp. 92-99. , quiz 100-101; Elsyad, M.A., Gebreel, A.A., Fouad, M.M., Elshoukouki, A.H., The clinical and radiographic outcome of immediately loaded mini implants supporting a mandibular overdentur. A 3-year prospective study (2011) J Oral Rehabil, 38, pp. 827-834; Elsyad, M.A., Ghoneem, N.E., El-Sharkawy, H., Marginal bone loss around unsplinted mini-implants supporting maxillary overdentures: A preliminary comparative study between partial and full palatal coverage (2013) Quintessence Int, 44, pp. 45-52; Balkin, B.E., Steflik, D.E., Naval, F., Mini-dental implant insertion with the auto-advance technique for ongoing applications (2001) J Oral Implantol, 27, pp. 32-37; Preoteasa, E., Melescanu-Imre, M., Preoteasa, C.T., Marin, M., Lerner, H., Aspects of oral morphology as decision factors in mini-implant supported overdenture (2010) Rom J Morphol Embryol, 51, pp. 309-314; Sallam, H., Kheiralla, L.S., Aldawakly, A., Microstrains around standard and mini implants supporting different bridge designs (2012) J Oral Implantol, 38, pp. 221-229; Kanie, T., Nagata, M., Ban, S., Comparison of the mechanical properties of 2 prosthetic mini-implants (2004) Implant Dent, 13, pp. 251-256; Simon, H., Caputo, A.A., Removal torque of immediately loaded transitional endosseous implants in human subjects (2002) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp. 839-845; Romanos, G.E., Nentwig, G.H., Immediate versus delayed functional loading of implants in the posterior mandible: A 2-year prospective clinical study of 12 consecutive cases (2006) Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 26, pp. 459-469; Hansson, H.A., Albrektsson, T., Branemark, P.I., Structural aspects of the interface between tissue and titanium implants (1983) J Prosthet Dent, 50, pp. 108-113; Szmukler-Moncler, S., Salama, H., Reingewirtz, Y., Dubruille, J.H., Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: Review of experimental literature (1998) J Biomed Mater Res, 43, pp. 192-203; Elsyad, M.A., Al-Mahdy, Y.F., Fouad, M.M., Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immediate loaded two implants supporting a ball-retained mandibular overdenture: A 3-year randomized clinical trial (2012) Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp. 496-503; Lekholm, U., Zarb, G.A., Patient selection and preparation (1985) Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry, pp. 199-210. , Br�nemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Chicago; Quintessence; Zielhuis, G.A., Straatman, H., van't Hof-Grootenboer, A.E., van Lier, H.J., Rach, G.H., van den Broek, P., The choice of a balanced allocation method for a clinical trial in otitis media with effusion (1990) Stat Med, 9, pp. 237-246; Mombelli, A., van Oosten, M.A., Schurch, E., Jr., Land, N.P., The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants (1987) Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2, pp. 145-151; Loe, H., Silness, J., Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity (1963) Acta Odontol Scand, 21, pp. 533-551; Canullo, L., Fedele, G.R., Iannello, G., Jepsen, S., Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: The results of a randomized-controlled trial (2010) Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp. 115-121; Smith, D.E., Zarb, G.A., Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants (1989) J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp. 567-572; Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B., Br�nemark, P.I., A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw (1981) Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp. 387-416; Adell, R., Eriksson, B., Lekholm, U., Br�nemark, P.I., Jemt, T., Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws (1990) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp. 347-359; Naert, I., De Clercq, M., Theuniers, G., Schepers, E., Overdentures supported by osseointegrated fixtures for the edentulous mandible: A 2.5-year report (1988) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 3, pp. 191-196; Elsyad, M.A., Elsaadawy, M.G., Abdou, A.M., Habib, A.A., Effect of different implant positions on strain developed around four implants supporting a mandibular overdenture with rigid telescopic copings (2013) Quintessence Int, 44, pp. 679-686; Chiapasco, M., Abati, S., Romeo, E., Vogel, G., Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Br�nemark System MKII implants: A prospective comparative study between delayed and immediate loading (2001) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16, pp. 537-546; Gatti, C., Haefliger, W., Chiapasco, M., Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: A prospective study of ITI implants (2000) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp. 383-388; Adrian, E.D., Krantz, W.A., Ivanhoe, J.R., The use of processed silicone to retain the implant-supported tissue-borne overdenture (1992) J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp. 219-222; Kiat-Amnuay, S., Khan, Z., Gettleman, L., Overdenture retention of four resilient liners over an implant bar (1999) J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp. 568-573; Tawse-Smith, A., Perio, C., Payne, A.G., Kumara, R., Thomson, W.M., One-stage operative procedure using two different implant systems: A prospective study on implant overdentures in the edentulous mandible (2001) Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 3, pp. 185-193; Oetterli, M., Kiener, P., Mericske-Stern, R., A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: The influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters (2001) Int J Prosthodont, 14, pp. 536-542; Morneburg, T.R., Proschel, P.A., Success rates of microimplants in edentulous patients with residual ridge resorption (2008) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp. 270-276; Behneke, A., Behneke, N., d'Hoedt, B., The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: A 5-year follow-up report (2000) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp. 633-645; Albrektsson, T., Zarb, G., Worthington, P., Eriksson, A.R., The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success (1986) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp. 11-25; Zarb, G.A., Albrektsson, T., Consensus report: Towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants (1998) J Prosthet Dent, 80, p. 641; Jeong, S.M., Choi, B.H., Li, J., Flapless implant surgery: An experimental study (2007) Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 104, pp. 24-28; Elsyad, M.A., Shoukouki, A.H., Resilient liner v. clip attachment effect on peri-implant tissues of bar-implant-retained mandibular overdenture: A 1-year clinical and radiographical study (2010) Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp. 473-480
dcterms.sourceScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_128.png
Size:
2.73 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty Of Dentistry Research Paper