A Comparative Clinical Study of the Effect of Denture Cleansing on the Surface Roughness and Hardness of Two Denture Base Materials
Date
9/15/2016
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type
Article
Publisher
ID Design Press
Series Info
Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences;
;المجلد 4 الإصدار 3 الصفحات 476
;المجلد 4 الإصدار 3 الصفحات 476
Scientific Journal Rankings
Abstract
AIM:
This study aimed to verify the influence of oral environment and denture cleansers on the surface roughness and hardness of two different denture base materials.
METHODS:
A total of sixteen identical removable disc specimens (RDS) were processed. Eight RDS were made from heat-cured acrylic resin (AR) and the other eight were fabricated from thermoplastic injection moulded resin (TR). Surface roughness and hardness of DRS were measured using ultrasonic profilometry and Universal testing machine respectively. Then the four RDS (two AR and two of TR) were fixed to each maxillary denture, after three months RDS were retrieved. Surface roughness and hardness of RDS have measured again.
RESULTS:
The surface roughness measurements revealed no significant difference (p >0.05) for both disc groups at baseline. However, both groups showed a significant increase in the surface roughness after three months with higher mean value for (TR) group. On the other hand, the (AR) group showed higher hardness mean value than (TR) group at baseline with no significant decrease in the hardness values (p >0.05) following three months follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS:
Denture cleansers have an effect on the denture’s surface roughness and hardness concurrently with an oral condition which will consequently influence the complete dentures’ lifetime and patients’ satisfaction
Description
Keywords
University for Clinical study, complete denture, denture cleansing, denture base roughness, denture base hardness
Citation
Yunus N, Rasid AA, Azmil L, Abu-Hassan MI. Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2005;32(1):65–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01370.x . PMid:15634304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. 11th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2003. pp. 87–88. PMid:12781382. [Google Scholar] 3. Pires-de-Souza FC, Panzeri H, Vieira MA, Garcia L-FR, Consani S. Impact and fracture resistance of an experimental acrylic polymer with elastomer in different proportions. Mater Res. 2009;12(4):415–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392009000400007 . [Google Scholar] 4. Dhiman RR, Chowdhury SK. Midline fractures in single maxillary complete acrylic versus flexible dentures. Med J Armed Forces India. 2009;65:141–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80128-7 . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 5. Kutsch VK, Whitehouse JW, Schermerhorn K, et al. The evolution and advancement of dental thermoplastics. Dental Town. 2003;4(2):52–56. [Google Scholar] 6. Ardelean L, Bortun C, Podariu AC, Rusu LC. Some Alternatives for Classic Thermopolymerisable Acrylic Dentures. Materiale Plastice. 2012;49(1):30–33. [Google Scholar] 7. Soygun K, Bolayir G, Boztug A. Mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide versus reinforced PMMA denture base materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5(2):153–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.153 . PMid:23755341 PMCid: PMC3675288. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 8. Orsi IA, Junior AG, Villabona CA, Fernandes FH, Ito IY. Evaluation of the efficacy of chemical disinfectants for disinfection of heat-polymerised acrylic resin. Gerodontology. 2010;28(4):253–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00400.x . PMid:20609007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 9. Nikawa H, Jin C, Makihira S, Egusa H, Hamada T, Yamashiro H. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans on the surfaces of deteriorated soft denture lining materials caused by denture cleansers in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(3):243–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01024.x . PMid:12588495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 10. Glass RT, Bullard JW, Conrad RS, Blewett EL. Evaluation of the sanitization effectiveness of a denture-cleaning product on dentures contaminated with known microbial flora. An in vitro study. Quintessence Int. 2004;35(3):194–199. PMid:15119677. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 11. Berger JC, Driscoll CF, Romberg E, Luo Q, Thompson G. Surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins after processing and after polishing. J Prosthodont. 2006;15(3):180–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00098.x . PMid:16681500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 12. Pavarina AC, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Teraoka MT. The effect of disinfectant solutions on the hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(7):749–752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01145.x . PMid:12791163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 13. Pinto Lde R, Acosta EJ, Távora FF, da Silva PM, Porto VC. Effect of repeated cycles of chemical disinfection on the roughness and hardness of hard reline acrylic resins. Gerodontology. 2010;27(2):147–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00282.x . PMid:19508322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 14. Basson NJ, Quick AN, Thomas CJ. Household products as sanitizing agents in denture cleansing. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1992;47(10):437–439. PMid:9511605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 15. Bernabé W, Mendonça-Neto T, Pimenta FC, Pegoraro LF, Scolaro JM. Efficacy of sodium hypoclorite and coconut soap used as disinfecting agents in the reduction of denture stomatitis, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(5):453–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01254.x . PMid:15140171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 16. Paranhos HF, Panzeri H, Lara EH, Candido RC, Ito IY. Capacity of denture laque/biofilm removal and antimicrobial action of a new denture paste. Braz Dent J. 2000;11(2):97–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 17. Paranhos HF, Silva-Lovato CH, de Souza RF, Cruz PC, de Freitas-Pontes E, Watanabe, Ito IY. Effect of three methods for cleaning dentures on biofilms formed in vitro on acrylic resin. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(5):427–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00450.x . PMid:19486455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 18. Winkler S. Essential of complete denture prosthodontics. 2nd ed. 1988. p. 307. [Google Scholar] 19. Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Carlsson GE. Boucher’s Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 7th ed. 1997. p. 338. [Google Scholar] 20. Avon SL, Goulet J-P, Deslauriers N. Removable acrylic resin disk as a sampling system for the study of denture biofilms in vivo. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(1):32–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.12.001 . PMid:17280889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 21. Gemalmaz D, Pameijer CH, Latta M, Kuybulu F, Alcan T. In vivo disintegration of four different luting agents. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:831508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/831508 . PMid:22007219 PMCid: PMC3189560. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 22. Avon SL, Goulet JP, Deslauriers N. Removable acrylic resin disk as a sampling system for the study of denture biofilms in vivo. 2007;97(1):32–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 23. Rashed E, Ibrahim S, Swelem A, Ramadan A. The Effect of Different Cleansing methods on The Surface Roughness of Conventional and Flexible Acrylic Resin denture Base Materials. The Egyptian Dental J. 2012;58(4):3407–3416. [Google Scholar] 24. Machado AL, Breeding LC, Vergani CE, da Cruz Perez LE. Hardness and surface roughness of reline and denture base acrylic resins after repeated disinfection procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(2):115–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60120-7 . [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 25. Azevedo A, Machado AL, Vergani CE, et al. Effect of disinfectants on the hardness and roughnessof reline acrylic resins. J Prosthodont. 2006;15(4):235–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00112.x . PMid:16827736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 26. Radford DR, Sweet SP, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Adherence of Candida albicans to denture- base materials with different surface finishes. J Dent. 1998;26(7):577–583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00034-1 . [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 27. Quirynen M, Marechal M, Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, Darius PL, van Steenberghe D. The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation: an in vivo study in man. J Clin Periodontol. 1990;17(3):138–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1990.tb01077.x . PMid:2319000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 28. Yamauchi M, Yamamoto K, Wakabayashi M, Kawano J. In vitro adherence of microorganisms to denture base resin with different surface texture. Dent Mater J. 1990;9(1):19–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.9.19 . PMid:2098207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 29. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13(4):258–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3 . [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 30. Harrison Z, Johnson A, Douglas CW. An in vitro study into the effect of a limited range of denture cleaners on surface roughness and removal of Candida albicans from conventional heat-cured acrylic resin denture base material. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(5):460–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01250.x . PMid:15140172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 31. Hermann C, Mesquita MF, Consani RL, Henriques GE. The effect of aging by thermal cycling and mechanical brushing on resilient denture liner hardness and roughness. J Prosthodont. 2008;17(4):318–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00293.x . PMid:18266656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 32. Durkan Durkan R, Ayaz EA, Bagis B, Gurbuz A, Ozturk N, Korkmaz FM. Comparative effects of denture cleansers on physical properties of polyamide and polymethyl methacrylate base polymers. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(3):367–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-110 . PMid:23718995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 33. Shah J, Bulbule N, Kulkarni S, Shah R, Kakade D. Comparative Evaluation of Sorption, Solubility and Microhardness of Heat Cure Polymethylmethacrylate Denture Base Resin & Flexible Denture Base Resin. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(8):1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2014/8707.4770 . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 34. Neppelenbroek KH, Pavarina AC, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET. Hardness of heat-polymerizedacrylic resins after disinfection and long-term water immersion. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93(2):171–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.020 . PMid:15674229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 35. Devlin H, Kaushik P. The Effect of Water Absorption on Acrylic Surface Properties. J Prosthodontics. 2005;14(4):233–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00050.x . PMid:16359479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 36. Braun KO, Mello JA, Rached RN, et al. Surface texture and some properties of acrylic resins submitted to chemical polishing. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(1):91–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.00997.x . PMid:12485391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 37. Phoenix RD. Denture base resins. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. St Louis: Elsevier; 2003. pp. 721–757. [Google Scholar] 38. Marra J, de Souza RF, Barbosa DB, Pero AC, Compagnoni MA. Evaluation of the bond strength of denture base resins to acrylic resin teeth: Effect of thermocycling. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2009;18(5):438–443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00478.x . PMid:19515169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 39. Goiato MC, Santos DM, Moreno A, Iyda MG, Rezende MC, Haddad MF. Effect of disinfection and storage on the flexural strength of ocular prosthesis acrylic resins. Gerodontology. 2012;29(2):838–844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00570.x . PMid:22004090.