A Systematic Multi-Dataset, Multi-Seed Evaluation of Preprocessing Strategies for Retinal Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts MSA
dc.contributor.authorAbdullah Alajmi
dc.contributor.authorYoussef Elnahal
dc.contributor.authorMohamed Othman
dc.contributor.authorManal Aljuhani
dc.contributor.authorAmani Alharbi
dc.contributor.authorGhada Abdelhady
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-25T11:13:48Z
dc.date.issued2026-09-07
dc.descriptionSJR 2025 0.848 Q2 H-Index 103 Subject Area and Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Clinical Biochemistry Medicine Internal Medicine
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: Accurate delineation of the optic disc and optic cup in retinal fundus photographs is a prerequisite for automated glaucoma screening. While encoder–decoder segmentation models have advanced considerably, the contribution of upstream preprocessing to segmentation accuracy, and the stability of that contribution across repeated training runs, remain insufficiently characterized. Methods: Five preprocessing pipelines, baseline, Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), Region of Interest (ROI) cropping, ROI+CLAHE, and CLAHE with heavy augmentation, were benchmarked under a fixed EfficientUNet++ model with an EfficientNet-B7 encoder on three publicly available fundus datasets (REFUGE, ORIGA, and Drishti-GS). Every configuration was retrained under three independent random seeds (42, 15, and 89) to assess run-to-run variability. Seed-level standard deviations accompany every reported mean and define the confidence limit on each ranking. Results: On REFUGE, CLAHE with augmentation (Config 5) achieved the strongest mean Dice (disc (Formula presented.) ; cup (Formula presented.) ). On ORIGA, all five configurations clustered within 0.0067 disc Dice; ROI+CLAHE (Config 4) was marginally ahead on disc ( (Formula presented.) ) and augmentation led on the cup ( (Formula presented.) ). On Drishti-GS, all five configurations converged successfully once optimizer and loss settings were corrected; the near-total failures seen in earlier single-run experiments reflected a configuration problem, not the small (81-image) training set. Conclusions: CLAHE applied to full-resolution images is the single most consistently beneficial preprocessing choice across all three datasets. ROI+CLAHE showed a small, initialization-stable advantage on ORIGA, but ROI crop centres were derived from ground-truth centroids, an oracle localization setting, and these results should not be interpreted as achievable by a fully automated pipeline. Data augmentation showed a consistent reduction in initialization sensitivity on small datasets and may be beneficial as a default strategy.
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21100852989&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.citationAlajmi, A., Elnahal, Y., Othman, M., Aljuhani, M., Alharbi, A., & Abdelhady, G. (2026). A Systematic Multi-Dataset, Multi-Seed Evaluation of Preprocessing Strategies for Retinal Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation. Diagnostics, 16(17), 2880. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16172880
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16172880
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16172880
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.msa.edu.eg/handle/123456789/6860
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiagnostics ; Volume 16 , Issue 17 , Article number 2880
dc.subjectablation study
dc.subjectCLAHE
dc.subjectdeep learning
dc.subjectEfficientUNet++
dc.subjectfundus images
dc.subjectglaucoma detection
dc.subjectimage preprocessing
dc.subjectmulti-seed evaluation
dc.subjectoptic cup segmentation
dc.subjectoptic disc segmentation
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.titleA Systematic Multi-Dataset, Multi-Seed Evaluation of Preprocessing Strategies for Retinal Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
diagnostics-16-02880.pdf
Size:
9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
51 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: