Micro-shear bond strength of 3D printed hybrid ceramic with nonthermal plasma surface treatment: in-vitro study
| dc.Affiliation | October University for modern sciences and Arts MSA | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mostafa El-Shazly | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ghada Alkaranfilly | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mahmoud Osama El-Ghazawy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bassem Emad | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aliaa Mahrous | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-16T07:58:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-04-02 | |
| dc.description | SJR 2025 0.893 Q1 H-Index 382 Subject Area and Category: Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary | |
| dc.description.abstract | The optimal surface treatment for developing a durable bond of dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement and 3D printed hybrid ceramic has not yet been established. To evaluate the effect of Non-Thermal Atmospheric Plasma (NTAP), sandblasting (SB), and a combination of both techniques on Micro-Shear Bond Strength (µSBS) of dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement bonded to 3D printed hybrid ceramic after thermocycling, and assess the failure mode using SEM. A total of 75 resin tags of dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement (TheraCem) were cemented to fifteen discs of 3D Printed Hybrid Ceramic (Saremc- Print Crowntec) (five resin tags/ disc). Specimens were allocated into five groups according to discs’ surface treatment (n = 15); PL group: specimens were treated with NTAP, S50 group: specimens were treated with 50 μm AL2O3 SB, S110 group: treated with 110 μm AL2O3 SB, SP50 group: treated with 50 μm AL2O3 SB followed by NTAP, and SP110 group: treated with 110 μm AL2O3 SB followed by NTAP. Resin cylinders, 0.8 mm in diameter and 1 mm height, were cemented to discs. The µSBS test was performed using a universal testing machine after thermocycling. SEM was used to analyze the failure mode. Data were analyzed using Welch one-way ANOVA followed by the Games-Howell post hc test. A significant difference between groups (P = 0.026). The highest value was measured in SP50 (2.70 ± 0.49) (MPa), followed by SP110 (2.37±0.38) (MPa), then PL (2.35 ± 0.57) (MPa), and S110 (2.18 ± 0.31) (MPa), while the lowest value was found in S50 (2.12 ± 0.75) (MPa). Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed SP50 to have significantly higher values than S110 and S50 (P < 0.05). NTAP, particularly when combined with 50 μm sandblasting, improved µSBS to 3D-printed hybrid ceramics under the conditions of this in-vitro study. Clinical validation is recommended. | |
| dc.description.uri | https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21100200805&tip=sid&clean=0 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | El-Shazly, M., Alkaranfilly, G., El-Ghazawy, M. O., Emad, B., & Mahrous, A. (2026). Micro-shear bond strength of 3D printed hybrid ceramic with non-thermal plasma surface treatment: in-vitro study. Scientific Reports, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43647-w | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43647-w | |
| dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43647-w | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.msa.edu.eg/handle/123456789/6700 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Nature Research | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Scientific Reports ; Volume 16 , Issue 1 , Article number 11237 | |
| dc.subject | Air abrasion | |
| dc.subject | Low-temperature plasma | |
| dc.subject | Resin-dentin bonding | |
| dc.title | Micro-shear bond strength of 3D printed hybrid ceramic with nonthermal plasma surface treatment: in-vitro study | |
| dc.type | Article |
