Towards a Composite index for measuring the higher education institutions in Egypt
dc.Affiliation | October University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA) | |
dc.contributor.author | El-Hefnawy M.R.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | El-Bastawissy A.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kadry M.A. | |
dc.contributor.other | Computer Engineering Department | |
dc.contributor.other | Arab Academy for Science and Technology | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo | |
dc.contributor.other | Egypt; Computer Science Department | |
dc.contributor.other | Modern Sciences and Arts University | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo | |
dc.contributor.other | Egypt | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-09T20:42:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-09T20:42:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.description | Scopus | |
dc.description.abstract | Egypt has the largest and most significant higher education system in the Middle East and North Africa but it had been continuously facing serious and accumulated challenges. The gap between what is existing and what is supposed to be for the self-regulation and improvement processes is not entirely clear to face these challenges. The effective use of information technology in higher education requires good and new techniques as well as rational strategies. The reform of higher education through strategies based on data analysis of current situation will affect the overall performance of transitional state and will shape new paradigms in higher education system development in Egypt. This research has objective to develop a model of Composite index (CI) based on a set of key performance indicators (KPI) commensurate with the nature of higher education institutions in Egypt. The outcomes of the composite index aim to measure overall performance of institutions and provide unified ranking method in this context. KPIs are determined as description of key success factors related to institutions sustainability. These KPIs are classified into main areas and sub-indicators. Within this scope, the indicators were weighted via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method according to their significance levels. Pairwise comparison survey template and database web application were developed to collect narrative responses, apply algorithm and extract results. The research study was conducted with 40 professors from 19 renowned universities in Egypt as education experts. The status of composite index model implementation is discussed from theoretical and technical perspectives. � 2014 The Science and Information (SAI) Organization. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Microsoft;RK Trans2Cloud | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21100344994&tip=sid&clean=0 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1109/SAI.2014.6918169 | |
dc.identifier.doi | PubMed ID : | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9.78E+12 | |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.1109/SAI.2014.6918169 | |
dc.identifier.other | PubMed ID : | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://t.ly/NX6LD | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Proceedings of 2014 Science and Information Conference, SAI 2014 | |
dc.subject | October University for Modern Sciences and Arts | |
dc.subject | University for Modern Sciences and Arts | |
dc.subject | MSA University | |
dc.subject | جامعة أكتوبر للعلوم الحديثة والآداب | |
dc.subject | Analytic Hierarchy Process | en_US |
dc.subject | Composite index | en_US |
dc.subject | Higher Education Institutions Ranking | en_US |
dc.subject | Key Performance Indicators | en_US |
dc.subject | Performance Measurement | en_US |
dc.subject | Analytic hierarchy process | en_US |
dc.subject | Benchmarking | en_US |
dc.subject | Information use | en_US |
dc.subject | Societies and institutions | en_US |
dc.subject | Analytic hierarchy process (ahp) | en_US |
dc.subject | Composite index | en_US |
dc.subject | Higher education institutions | en_US |
dc.subject | Higher education system | en_US |
dc.subject | Information technology in higher educations | en_US |
dc.subject | Key performance indicators | en_US |
dc.subject | Middle East and North Africa | en_US |
dc.subject | Performance measurements | en_US |
dc.subject | Education | en_US |
dc.title | Towards a Composite index for measuring the higher education institutions in Egypt | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
dcterms.isReferencedBy | http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/EGY, (2013) Human Development Index-Annual Report 2013; http://mhe-spu.org/siteold/admin/uploads/events/files/Report_on_Master_Plan.pdf, (2013) Supreme Council of Universities-Egypt strategy plan for education until 2021; El-Hadidi, M., Anis, H., El-Akabawi, S., Fahmy, A., Salem, M., Tantawy, A., El-Rafie, A., Abdel-Fattah, K., Quantifying the ict needs of academic institutes using the service category-stakeholder matrix approach (2008) 6th ICICT'08 Conference Proc, pp. 107-113. , December; http://www.ictp.org.eg/index.php/ar/2012-11-03-22-55-31/2012-11-03-22-56-46, (2012) Information and Communications Technology Project, unified Management Information System brief description; Liu, N.C., Wang, Q., Cheng, Y., (2011) Paths to A World-class University: Lessons from Practices and Experiences, 23. , Springer; Alexander, F.K., The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education (2000) Journal of Higher Education, pp. 411-443; McKinnon, K.R., Walker, S.H., Davis, D., (2000) A Manual for Australian Universities, , Australian Higher Education Division, Australia; Sadlak, J., Liu, N.C., (2007) The World-class University and Ranking: Aiming beyond Status, , Bucharest, Romania/Shanghai, China/Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Unesco-Cepes; Hazelkorn, E., (2013) How Rankings Are Reshaping Higher Education; Rauhvargers, A., Global university rankings and their impact (2011) Leadership for WorldClass Universities Challenges for Developing Countries June; Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Zhou, D.Q., Weighting and aggregation in composite indicator construction: A multiplicative optimization approach (2010) Social Indicators Research, 96 (1), pp. 169-181; Ismail, E.M., Ranking of universities (2010) 2nd International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education, pp. 6-8; Saaty, T.L., (1988) What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process?, pp. 109-121. , Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Lingxi, Z., Hao, Y., Study on the AHP-based evaluation system of excellence of university classes (2010) Education and Management Technology (ICEMT), 2010 International Conference on, pp. 242-247. , IEEE; Badri, M.A., Abdulla, M.H., Awards of excellence in institutions of higher education: An AHP approach (2004) International Journal of Educational Management, 18 (4), pp. 224-242; Lavy, V., Evaluating the effect of teachers" group performance incentives on pupil achievement (2002) Journal of Political Economy, 110 (6), pp. 1286-1317; Saltelli, A., Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy (2007) Social Indicators Research, 81 (1), pp. 65-77; Bandura, R., (2008) A Survey of Composite Indices Measuring Country Performance: 2008 Update, , Office of Development Studies, New York: United Nations Development Program; Giovannini, E., Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, A., Hoffman, A., Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide (2008) Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); Saisana, M., Hombres, B., Saltelli, A., Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications (2011) Research Policy, 40 (1), pp. 165-177; Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Ratings and rankings: Voodoo or science? (2012) Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society); Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G., Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process (2000) The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 6; Eccles, C., The use of university rankings in the United Kingdom (2002) Higher Education in Europe, 27 (4), pp. 423-432; Qian, X., Qu, W.-L., Qiu, F.-C., The design for the index system of college teachers performance assessment based on the AHP method J] (2008) Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences), 4, p. 021; Forman, E., Peniwati, K., Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process (1998) European Journal of Operational Research, 108 (1), pp. 165-169; Escobar, M.T., Jos�, M.M.-J., Aggregation of individual preference structures in AHP-group decision making (2007) Group Decision and Negotiation, 16 (4), pp. 287-301; Alonso, J.A., Lamata, M.T., Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach (2006) International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 14 (4), pp. 445-459; Aguaron, J., Jos, M.M.-J., The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds (2003) European Journal of Operational Research, 147 (1), pp. 137-145 | |
dcterms.source | Scopus |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- avatar_scholar_256.png
- Size:
- 6.31 KB
- Format:
- Portable Network Graphics
- Description: