Evaluation of buccal bone resorption in immediate implant placement in thin versus thick buccal bone plates: An 18-month follow-up prospective cohort study

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts MSA
dc.contributor.authorElNahass, Hani
dc.contributor.authorTawfik, Omnia K
dc.contributor.authorNaiem, Suzy N
dc.contributor.authorZazou, Nada
dc.contributor.authorMoussa, Mahmoud
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T07:34:27Z
dc.date.available2024-03-20T07:34:27Z
dc.date.issued2024-02
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The current guidelines recommend that immediate implants be placed in patients with thick (>1 mm) buccal bone due to the inevitable tissue remodeling that follows tooth extraction. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of buccal bone thickness on bone resorption in immediate implant placement and compare two measuring techniques of the aforementioned resorption. Materials: The present study was designed as a prospective nonrandomized, controlled clinical trial. A total of 30 implants were split between the two study arms, thin buccal bone and thick buccal bone. The primary outcome was to assess vertical bone changes radiographically by cone beam scans preoperatively, at 2 months and 18 months after implant placement in patients with thin and thick buccal plate. Secondary outcomes included the change in the thickness of the buccal bony plate, marginal bone loss, and pink esthetic score. Results: Only 26 implants were statistically analyzed as one early failure was observed in each group. Furthermore, 2 patients of the thick group withdrew from the study. Cone beam computed tomography measurements revealed that at 2 months the vertical bone loss was 1.09 for the thin group and 0.85 for the thick group. The buccal bone plate resorption of the thin group was 0.39 mm while it was 0.52 mm for the thick group. The buccal bone plate was 1.25 mm in the thin group and 1.88 mm in the thick group. The PES did not show any significant difference with very good esthetic results. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the current study, the amount of buccal bone plate resorption and the subsequent thickness obtained after implantation in both groups suggest successful long-term results. The two measuring techniques have proven to be comparable and reliable in the measurement of buccal bony plate changes.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=24403&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13312
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13312
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.msa.edu.eg/xmlui/handle/123456789/5907
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research;2024
dc.subjectbuccal bone; buccal bone resorption; immediate implant; thin boneen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of buccal bone resorption in immediate implant placement in thin versus thick buccal bone plates: An 18-month follow-up prospective cohort studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IMG-20231214-WA0000.jpg
Size:
16.8 KB
Format:
Joint Photographic Experts Group/JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF)
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
51 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: