Soft Tissue Esthetic using Pink esthetic score with Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation versus Conventional Immediate Implantation with Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone: (Randomized Controlled clinical trial)

dc.AffiliationOctober university for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorShoeib, Mona Aly
dc.contributor.authorhamada, cherine emad mahmoud mohamed
dc.contributor.authorAbdelrahman, Ahmed Reda
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-23T07:36:57Z
dc.date.available2022-10-23T07:36:57Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.description.abstractObjective: When restoring teeth in the aesthetic zone, soft tissue aesthetics for an immediate implant is considered challenging. This study aimed to evaluate soft tissue aesthetics around immediate dental implants with dentin chips and xenograft in thin buccal bone. Methodology: 16 patients with non-restorable teeth were recruited in this study for immediate implant placement with augmentation. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups; dentin chips group with immediate implant and xenograft group with immediate implant also. Pink aesthetic scores are recorded on loading at 6 months & after 1 year of implant insertion according to Vanlıoğlu. Also, buccal bone and crestal bone resorption were measured using CBCT at 6 months & 1 year; implant stability was measured using osstel immediately on implant insertion & before loading, and pain is recorded as a Numerical rating scale according to Breivik. Results: In the present study, both groups showed better PES after 6 months and 1 year P-value = 0.343; P- value = 0.199 ; nearly same level of crestal bone & buccal bone at 6 months & 1 year P-value = 0.031; P-value = 0.029 P-value = 0.546; P-value = 0.268 ; implant stability is better at 6 months and one year P-value = 0.514; P- value = 0.340 and reduction in the post-operative pain within 1 week following implant placement with but with statistically significant difference within each group and also between both groups. Conclusions: The use of autogenous dentin chips proved to be a valid alternative to bone grafting materials to fill the jumping gap in conjunction with immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. PES, the overall difference between the control and the intervention groups showed no statistical significance.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2176620/v1
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2176620/v1
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.msa.edu.eg/xmlui/handle/123456789/5229
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer natureen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch square;
dc.subjectDentineen_US
dc.subjectimmediate implanten_US
dc.subjectxenograften_US
dc.subjectautogenous tooth graften_US
dc.subjectthin buccal boneen_US
dc.titleSoft Tissue Esthetic using Pink esthetic score with Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation versus Conventional Immediate Implantation with Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone: (Randomized Controlled clinical trial)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
baf6ac21-6e13-41a6-8d51-6eb576f6eb21.pdf
Size:
1.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
51 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: