Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorEl Wakeel A.M.
dc.contributor.authorElkassas D.W.
dc.contributor.authorYousry M.M.
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Conservative Dentistry
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Dental Medicine
dc.contributor.otherModern Sciences and Arts University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Department of Operative Dentistry
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Oral and Dental Medicine
dc.contributor.otherMisr International University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Department of Operative Dentistry
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Oral and Dental Medicine
dc.contributor.otherCairo University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T20:41:59Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T20:41:59Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionScopus
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study was conducted to evaluate the microshear bond strength (?SBS) and ultramorphological characterization of glass ionomer (GI) cements; conventional GI cement (Fuji IX, CGI), resin modified GI (Fuji II LC, RMGI) and nano-ionomer (Ketac N100, NI) to enamel, dentin and cementum substrates. Materials and Methods: Forty-five lower molars were sectioned above the cemento-enamel junction. The occlusal surfaces were ground flat to obtain enamel and dentin substrates, meanwhile the cervical one-third of the root portion were utilized to evaluate the bonding efficacy to cementum substrate. Each substrate received microcylinders from the three tested materials; which were applied according to manufacturer instructions. ?SBS was assessed using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test. Modes of failure were examined using stereomicroscope at 25 magnification. Interfacial analysis of the bonded specimens was carried out using environmental field emission scanning electron microscope. Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed that materials, substrates and their interaction had a statistically significant effect on the mean ?SBS values at P values; ?0.0001, 0.0108 and 0.0037 respectively. RMGI showed statistically significant the highest ?SBS values to all examined tooth substrates. CGI and RMGI show substrate independent bonding efficiency, meanwhile; NI showed higher ?SBS values to dentin and cementum compared to enamel. Conclusion: Despite technological development of GI materials, mainly the nano-particles use, better results have not been achieved for both investigations, when compared to RMGI, independent of tooth substrate. � 2015 Dental Investigations Society.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=19900191833&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156799
dc.identifier.doiPubMed ID :
dc.identifier.issn13057456
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156799
dc.identifier.otherPubMed ID :
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/2ddpG
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherDental Investigations Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Journal of Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofseries9
dc.subjectOctober University for Modern Sciences and Arts
dc.subjectجامعة أكتوبر للعلوم الحديثة والآداب
dc.subjectUniversity of Modern Sciences and Arts
dc.subjectMSA University
dc.subjectCementumen_US
dc.subjectConventional glass ionomeren_US
dc.subjectDentinen_US
dc.subjectEnamelen_US
dc.subjectMicroshear bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectNano-ionomeren_US
dc.subjectResin-modified glass ionomeren_US
dc.titleBonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.isReferencedByInoue, S., Van Meerbeek, B., Abe, Y., Yoshida, Y., Lambrechts, P., Vanherle, G., Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive (2001) Dent Mater, 17, pp. 445-455; Ferrari, M., Davidson, C.L., Interdiffusion of a traditional glass ionomer cement into conditioned dentin (1997) Am J Dent, 10, pp. 295-297; Sidhu, S.K., Watson, T.F., Resin-modified glass-ionomer material Part 1: Properties. (1995) Dent Update, 22, pp. 429-432; Khoroushi, M., Karvandi, T.M., Sadeghi, R., Effect of prewarming and/ or delayed light activation on resin-modified glass ionomer bond strength to tooth structures (2012) Oper Dent, 37, pp. 54-62; El-Askary, F.S., Nassif, M.S., The effect of the pre-conditioning step on the shear bond strength of nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer to dentin (2011) Eur J Dent, 5, pp. 150-156; Davidson, C.L., Advances in glass-ionomer cements (2006) J Appl Oral Sci, 14, pp. 3-9; Sterrett, J.D., Gerard, D.A., Johnston, K., Torres, M.A., "Burnishing" demineralization of root surfaces: Ultrastructural surface characteristics (2006) J Adhes Dent, 8, pp. 161-167; Tanumiharja, M., Burrow, M.F., Tyas, M.J., Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four conditioners (2000) J Dent, 28, pp. 361-366; Yousry, M.M., Effect of re-etching oxalate-occluded dentin and enamel on bonding effectiveness of etch-and-rinse adhesives (2012) J Adhes Dent, 14, pp. 31-38; Magni, E., Ferrari, M., Hickel, R., Ilie, N., Evaluation of the mechanical properties of dental adhesives and glass-ionomer cements (2010) Clin Oral Investig, 14, pp. 79-87; El-Askary, F.S., Nassif, M.S., Fawzy, A.S., Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin: Effect of smear layer thickness and different dentin conditioners (2008) J Adhes Dent, 10, pp. 471-479; Elkassas, D.W., Fawzi, E.M., El Zohairy, A., The effect of cavity disinfectants on the micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesives (2014) Eur J Dent, 8, pp. 184-190; McDonough, W.G., Antonucci, J.M., He, J., Shimada, Y., Chiang, M.Y., Schumacher, G.E., A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin-polymer interfaces (2002) Biomaterials, 23, pp. 3603-3608; Sidhu, S.K., Sherriff, M., Watson, T.F., Failure of resin-modified glass-ionomers subjected to shear loading (1999) J Dent, 27, pp. 373-381; Coutinho, E., Yoshida, Y., Inoue, S., Fukuda, R., Snauwaert, J., Nakayama, Y., Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces (2007) J Dent Res, 86, pp. 656-661; Tay, F.R., Sidhu, S.K., Watson, T.F., Pashley, D.H., Water-dependent interfacial transition zone in resin-modified glass-ionomer cement/ dentin interfaces (2004) J Dent Res, 83, pp. 644-649; Glasspoole, E.A., Erickson, R.L., Davidson, C.L., Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel (2002) Dent Mater, 18, pp. 454-462; Rao, K.S., Reddy, T.P., Yugandhar, G., Kumar, B.S., Reddy, S.N., Babu, D.A., Comparison of shear bond strength of resin reinforced chemical cure glass ionomer, conventional chemical cure glass ionomer and chemical cure composite resin in direct bonding systems: An in vitro study (2013) J Contemp Dent Pract, 14, pp. 21-25; Pereira, L.C., Nunes, M.C., Dibb, R.G., Powers, J.M., Roulet, J.F., Navarro, M.F., Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements (2002) J Adhes Dent, 4, pp. 73-80; Coutinho, E., Cardoso, M.V., De Munck, J., Neves, A.A., Van Landuyt, K.L., Poitevin, A., Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer (2009) Dent Mater, 25, pp. 1347-1357; Lin, A., McIntyre, N.S., Davidson, R.D., Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin (1992) J Dent Res, 71, pp. 1836-1841; Gordan, V.V., Boyer, D., Sderholm, K.J., Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives (1998) J Dent, 26, pp. 497-503; Cho, B.H., Dickens, S.H., Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength (2004) Dent Mater, 20, pp. 107-115; Fritz, U.B., Finger, W.J., Uno, S., Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Bonding to enamel and dentin (1996) Dent Mater, 12, pp. 161-166; Uysal, T., Yagci, A., Uysal, B., Akdogan, G., Are nano-composites and nano-ionomers suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding? (2010) Eur J Orthod, 32, pp. 78-82; Baldassarri, M., Margolis, H.C., Beniash, E., Compositional determinants of mechanical properties of enamel (2008) J Dent Res, 87, pp. 645-649; Korkmaz, Y., Ozel, E., Attar, N., Ozge Bicer, C., Influence of different conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of novel light-curing nano-ionomer restorative to enamel and dentin (2010) Lasers Med Sci, 25, pp. 861-866; Ngo, H., Mount, G.J., Peters, M.C., A study of glass-ionomer cement and its interface with enamel and dentin using a low-temperature, high-resolution scanning electron microscopic technique (1997) Quintessence Int, 28, pp. 63-69; Yip, H.K., Tay, F.R., Ngo, H.C., Smales, R.J., Pashley, D.H., Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin (2001) Dent Mater, 17, pp. 456-470; Zoergiebel, J., Ilie, N., An in vitro study on the maturation of conventional glass ionomer cements and their interface to dentin (2013) Acta Biomater, 9, pp. 9529-9537
dcterms.sourceScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_256.png
Size:
6.31 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description: