Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study
dc.Affiliation | October University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA) | |
dc.contributor.author | El Wakeel A.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Elkassas D.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yousry M.M. | |
dc.contributor.other | Department of Conservative Dentistry | |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Dental Medicine | |
dc.contributor.other | Modern Sciences and Arts University | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo | |
dc.contributor.other | Egypt; Department of Operative Dentistry | |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine | |
dc.contributor.other | Misr International University | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo | |
dc.contributor.other | Egypt; Department of Operative Dentistry | |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo University | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo | |
dc.contributor.other | Egypt | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-09T20:41:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-09T20:41:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description | Scopus | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the microshear bond strength (?SBS) and ultramorphological characterization of glass ionomer (GI) cements; conventional GI cement (Fuji IX, CGI), resin modified GI (Fuji II LC, RMGI) and nano-ionomer (Ketac N100, NI) to enamel, dentin and cementum substrates. Materials and Methods: Forty-five lower molars were sectioned above the cemento-enamel junction. The occlusal surfaces were ground flat to obtain enamel and dentin substrates, meanwhile the cervical one-third of the root portion were utilized to evaluate the bonding efficacy to cementum substrate. Each substrate received microcylinders from the three tested materials; which were applied according to manufacturer instructions. ?SBS was assessed using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test. Modes of failure were examined using stereomicroscope at 25 magnification. Interfacial analysis of the bonded specimens was carried out using environmental field emission scanning electron microscope. Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed that materials, substrates and their interaction had a statistically significant effect on the mean ?SBS values at P values; ?0.0001, 0.0108 and 0.0037 respectively. RMGI showed statistically significant the highest ?SBS values to all examined tooth substrates. CGI and RMGI show substrate independent bonding efficiency, meanwhile; NI showed higher ?SBS values to dentin and cementum compared to enamel. Conclusion: Despite technological development of GI materials, mainly the nano-particles use, better results have not been achieved for both investigations, when compared to RMGI, independent of tooth substrate. � 2015 Dental Investigations Society. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=19900191833&tip=sid&clean=0 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156799 | |
dc.identifier.doi | PubMed ID : | |
dc.identifier.issn | 13057456 | |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156799 | |
dc.identifier.other | PubMed ID : | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://t.ly/2ddpG | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | Dental Investigations Society | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | European Journal of Dentistry | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 9 | |
dc.subject | October University for Modern Sciences and Arts | |
dc.subject | جامعة أكتوبر للعلوم الحديثة والآداب | |
dc.subject | University of Modern Sciences and Arts | |
dc.subject | MSA University | |
dc.subject | Cementum | en_US |
dc.subject | Conventional glass ionomer | en_US |
dc.subject | Dentin | en_US |
dc.subject | Enamel | en_US |
dc.subject | Microshear bond strength | en_US |
dc.subject | Nano-ionomer | en_US |
dc.subject | Resin-modified glass ionomer | en_US |
dc.title | Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dcterms.isReferencedBy | Inoue, S., Van Meerbeek, B., Abe, Y., Yoshida, Y., Lambrechts, P., Vanherle, G., Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive (2001) Dent Mater, 17, pp. 445-455; Ferrari, M., Davidson, C.L., Interdiffusion of a traditional glass ionomer cement into conditioned dentin (1997) Am J Dent, 10, pp. 295-297; Sidhu, S.K., Watson, T.F., Resin-modified glass-ionomer material Part 1: Properties. (1995) Dent Update, 22, pp. 429-432; Khoroushi, M., Karvandi, T.M., Sadeghi, R., Effect of prewarming and/ or delayed light activation on resin-modified glass ionomer bond strength to tooth structures (2012) Oper Dent, 37, pp. 54-62; El-Askary, F.S., Nassif, M.S., The effect of the pre-conditioning step on the shear bond strength of nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer to dentin (2011) Eur J Dent, 5, pp. 150-156; Davidson, C.L., Advances in glass-ionomer cements (2006) J Appl Oral Sci, 14, pp. 3-9; Sterrett, J.D., Gerard, D.A., Johnston, K., Torres, M.A., "Burnishing" demineralization of root surfaces: Ultrastructural surface characteristics (2006) J Adhes Dent, 8, pp. 161-167; Tanumiharja, M., Burrow, M.F., Tyas, M.J., Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four conditioners (2000) J Dent, 28, pp. 361-366; Yousry, M.M., Effect of re-etching oxalate-occluded dentin and enamel on bonding effectiveness of etch-and-rinse adhesives (2012) J Adhes Dent, 14, pp. 31-38; Magni, E., Ferrari, M., Hickel, R., Ilie, N., Evaluation of the mechanical properties of dental adhesives and glass-ionomer cements (2010) Clin Oral Investig, 14, pp. 79-87; El-Askary, F.S., Nassif, M.S., Fawzy, A.S., Shear bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin: Effect of smear layer thickness and different dentin conditioners (2008) J Adhes Dent, 10, pp. 471-479; Elkassas, D.W., Fawzi, E.M., El Zohairy, A., The effect of cavity disinfectants on the micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesives (2014) Eur J Dent, 8, pp. 184-190; McDonough, W.G., Antonucci, J.M., He, J., Shimada, Y., Chiang, M.Y., Schumacher, G.E., A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin-polymer interfaces (2002) Biomaterials, 23, pp. 3603-3608; Sidhu, S.K., Sherriff, M., Watson, T.F., Failure of resin-modified glass-ionomers subjected to shear loading (1999) J Dent, 27, pp. 373-381; Coutinho, E., Yoshida, Y., Inoue, S., Fukuda, R., Snauwaert, J., Nakayama, Y., Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces (2007) J Dent Res, 86, pp. 656-661; Tay, F.R., Sidhu, S.K., Watson, T.F., Pashley, D.H., Water-dependent interfacial transition zone in resin-modified glass-ionomer cement/ dentin interfaces (2004) J Dent Res, 83, pp. 644-649; Glasspoole, E.A., Erickson, R.L., Davidson, C.L., Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel (2002) Dent Mater, 18, pp. 454-462; Rao, K.S., Reddy, T.P., Yugandhar, G., Kumar, B.S., Reddy, S.N., Babu, D.A., Comparison of shear bond strength of resin reinforced chemical cure glass ionomer, conventional chemical cure glass ionomer and chemical cure composite resin in direct bonding systems: An in vitro study (2013) J Contemp Dent Pract, 14, pp. 21-25; Pereira, L.C., Nunes, M.C., Dibb, R.G., Powers, J.M., Roulet, J.F., Navarro, M.F., Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements (2002) J Adhes Dent, 4, pp. 73-80; Coutinho, E., Cardoso, M.V., De Munck, J., Neves, A.A., Van Landuyt, K.L., Poitevin, A., Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer (2009) Dent Mater, 25, pp. 1347-1357; Lin, A., McIntyre, N.S., Davidson, R.D., Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin (1992) J Dent Res, 71, pp. 1836-1841; Gordan, V.V., Boyer, D., Sderholm, K.J., Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives (1998) J Dent, 26, pp. 497-503; Cho, B.H., Dickens, S.H., Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength (2004) Dent Mater, 20, pp. 107-115; Fritz, U.B., Finger, W.J., Uno, S., Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Bonding to enamel and dentin (1996) Dent Mater, 12, pp. 161-166; Uysal, T., Yagci, A., Uysal, B., Akdogan, G., Are nano-composites and nano-ionomers suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding? (2010) Eur J Orthod, 32, pp. 78-82; Baldassarri, M., Margolis, H.C., Beniash, E., Compositional determinants of mechanical properties of enamel (2008) J Dent Res, 87, pp. 645-649; Korkmaz, Y., Ozel, E., Attar, N., Ozge Bicer, C., Influence of different conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of novel light-curing nano-ionomer restorative to enamel and dentin (2010) Lasers Med Sci, 25, pp. 861-866; Ngo, H., Mount, G.J., Peters, M.C., A study of glass-ionomer cement and its interface with enamel and dentin using a low-temperature, high-resolution scanning electron microscopic technique (1997) Quintessence Int, 28, pp. 63-69; Yip, H.K., Tay, F.R., Ngo, H.C., Smales, R.J., Pashley, D.H., Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin (2001) Dent Mater, 17, pp. 456-470; Zoergiebel, J., Ilie, N., An in vitro study on the maturation of conventional glass ionomer cements and their interface to dentin (2013) Acta Biomater, 9, pp. 9529-9537 | |
dcterms.source | Scopus |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- avatar_scholar_256.png
- Size:
- 6.31 KB
- Format:
- Portable Network Graphics
- Description: