The effect of combined corticotomy and low level laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: split mouth randomized clinical trial
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2019
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type
Article
Publisher
Japan Medical Laser Laboratory
Series Info
Laser Therapy;Volume 28, Issue 4, 2019, Pages 275-283
Scientific Journal Rankings
Abstract
J-STAGE home
Browse
All titles
All subject areas
All publishers
Search articles
About J-STAGE
Overview
Services and features
Public data
Terms and Policy
News and PR
News
Maintenance information
Special contents
PR media
Support
User's manual
Current confirmed browsers
FAQ
Contact
Sitemap
Sign in
Cart
EN
English
日本語
LASER THERAPY
Online ISSN : 1884-7269
Print ISSN : 0898-5901
ISSN-L : 0898-5901
Journal home
Original Article
The effect of combined corticotomy and low level laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: split mouth randomized clinical trial.
Karim A. Farid, Ahmed A. Eid, Mohammed A. Kaddah, Foad A. Elsharaby
Author information
Keywords: Orthodontics, Rate of retraction, Low-Level Laser Therapy, Corticotomy
JOURNALS FREE ACCESS
2019 Volume 28 Issue 4 Pages 275-283
DOI https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.19-OR-19
Details
Download PDF (416K)
Download Meta
RIS
(compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
BIB TEX
(compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)
Text
How to download Meta
Contact us
Article overview
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the combined effect of corticotomy and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
Methods: A randomized split-mouth design for 16 female patients compared the rate of maxillary canine retraction using corticotomy combined with LLLT versus corticotomy only. The device used in the present study was an In-Ga-As semiconductor diode laser emitting at 940 nm (IR) with these parameters: 0.5 W/cm2 power density, 5 J/cm2 Fluence, CW, 240 sec time irradiation, weekly for the first month and twice monthly for the next three months. Assessment of the rate of canine retraction was carried out via a series of dental models.
Results: A non-significant statistical rate of canine retraction was achieved by LLLT combined to corticotomy compared with the corticotomy technique alone.
Conclusion: Low-Level Laser Therapy combined to corticotomy could not achieve a higher rate of canine retraction compared to the golden standard corticotomy technique alone. No long-term adverse effects on the alveolar mucosa were detected following both techniques.
Description
Scopus
Keywords
Orthodontics, Rate of retraction, Low-Level Laser Therapy, Corticotomy