Autogenous dentin block versus bone block for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation and staged implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial including histologic assessment

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorElraee, Leila
dc.contributor.authorAbdel Gaber, Hala Kamal
dc.contributor.authorElsayed, Hakem H
dc.contributor.authorAdel-Khattab, Doaa
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-08T08:04:03Z
dc.date.available2022-05-08T08:04:03Z
dc.date.issued2022-05
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to compare the dentin block (D-group) harvested from impacted wisdom teeth with autogenous ramus bone block (A-group) for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation. Materials and methods: Forty two patients with anterior missing teeth and horizontal ridge defect were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 21 per group) to receive either dentin block group or autogenous bone block. Six months after the augmentation, dental implants were placed in all patients, and a core biopsy was performed for histological evaluation in addition to clinical and radiographic evaluation using cone beam computed tomography. Primary outcome was the mean overall clinical ridge width gain (CRWG) after 6 months of augmentation. Secondary outcomes were the overall radiographic ridge width gain (RRWG) after 6 months of augmentation and descriptive histological analysis with histomorphometric assessment of bone fraction %. Results: All sites healed uneventfully, and the mean overall CRWG 6 months after augmentation was 3.52 ± 0.56 mm and 2.24 ± 0.86 mm in the D and A groups, respectively, with statistically significant difference between them (P = < 0.001). The overall mean RRWG was 3.61 ± 0.61 mm and 3.41 ± 1.15 mm in D and A groups,respectively, without any statistically significant difference between them (P = 0.062) . The histomorphometric analysis of the bone area fraction was 42.6% and 41.3% in D and A groups, respectively, without any statistically significant difference between the two values (P = 0.89, Student's t-test). Histological evaluation in the D-group revealed new bone formation, viable cells, and matrix formation on the dentin block periphery, in addition to well-organized woven bone that suggests dentin block remodeling and supports new bone deposition. Conclusion: The present clinical study revealed that dentin block may serve as an alternative graft to support horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation. Dentin blocks showed less resorption than autogenous bone blocks.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=24408&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13936
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13936
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.msa.edu.eg/xmlui/handle/123456789/4932
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWielyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesClinical Oral Implants Research;
dc.subjectAlveolar ridge augmentationen_US
dc.subjectdentin blocken_US
dc.subjecttooth transplantationen_US
dc.subjectdental implantsen_US
dc.titleAutogenous dentin block versus bone block for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation and staged implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial including histologic assessmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Clinical Oral Implants Res - 2022 - Elraee - Autogenous dentin block versus bone block for horizontal alveolar ridge.pdf
Size:
23 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
51 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: