Infill development as an approach for promoting compactness of urban form
Loading...
Date
2013
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type
Article
Publisher
WIT Press
Series Info
Sustainable Development and Planning VI;Volume: 173 Pages: 455-466
Scientific Journal Rankings
Abstract
In the last few decades, urban decay has increased within the city urban fabric;
due to the deterioration of the inner city and increase in population. High income
citizens abandoned their houses demanding a better quality of life outside the
city fabric, leading the old city to be occupied by poorer households or left
vacant. Urban decay is linked to suburban sprawl as the economic life is pulled
out of the city, instead of a previously developed urban site within the old city
fabric. Infill development is the new development of vacant, abandoned, passed
over, or underutilized land within built-up areas of existing communities, where
infrastructure is already in place. It is a solution to filling gaps in existing
communities and playing a critical role in achieving community revitalization,
land conservation and alternatives to sprawl development. Taking advantage of
existing infrastructure, increasing walkability by contributing safe and attractive
pedestrian environment, creating new opportunities for mixed use that recapture
the “sense of place” that is largely missing in development projects. Infill
development is a solution to enhancing the character, viability and function of
the old city. The aim of this research is to articulate the potential and limits of
infill development. It focuses on factors that influence decisions to introduce
infill development as an approach to smart growth and a solution to urban decay.
This is achieved by analyzing international and local examples of infill
development to identify the different land use of vacant land in different urban
contexts. An analytical comparison is carried on the examples, to achieve broad
recommendations for infill development in different urban contexts.
Description
MSA Google Scholar
Keywords
University of Infill development, urban sprawl, revitalization, smart growth
Citation
[1] Faris, J. Terrence, The Barriers to Using Infill Development to Achieve Smart Growth, Housing Policy Debate 12 (1): 1–30, 2001. [2] Robinson and Cole LLP Best Practices to Encourage Infill Development. Association of prepared for the National Associaion of Realtors, 2002. [3] Downs, Anthony. Neighborhoods and urban developement. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 1981. [4] Charter of New Urbanism. Charter of New Urbanism. New York: McGraw, www.cnu.org, 2000. [5] Lynch, Kevin. Good City Form. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1981. [6] Ewing, Reid. “Best development practices.” Chicago Press. 1996. www.planning.org (accessed 12 20, 2012). [7] Official Development Plan By-laws. “City Of Vancouver.” April 2007. http://vancouver.ca/green-vancouver.aspx (accessed January 20, 2013). [8] Bandarin, Francesco and van Oers, Ron The historic urban landscape. UK: Wiley Blackwell, 2012. [9] Solidere, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.solidere.com. [Accessed [10] Trancik, R. Finding Lost Space –Theories of Urban Design, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1986.