Influence of Bioactive Desensitizers on Bonding of Self-adhesive Resin Cement: A SEM/EDX Microanalysis Study

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts MSA
dc.contributor.authorAlaa Turkistani
dc.contributor.authorRasha R. Basheer
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-22T17:08:46Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-28
dc.descriptionSJR 2024 0.214 Q3 H-Index 40
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Bioactive desensitizing agents are increasingly used to alleviate dentin hypersensitivity; however, their impact on the bonding performance of self-adhesive resin cements remains unclear. This in vitro study evaluated the effect of bioactive desensitizers on the bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement to dentin and examined elemental changes on the dentin surface using Energy-Dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry. Methods: Dentin surfaces of extracted molars were exposed and treated with a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer (Dentin Desensitizer; DD), a calcium phosphate-based desensitizer (Teethmate Desensitizer; TM), a hydroxyapatite-based desensitizer (Predicta Bioactive; PB), or fluoride gel (APF Fluoride Gel; FL). The control group received no treatment. Self-adhesive resin cement (Panavia SA Cement Universal) was applied in cylindrical molds. After thermocycling, microshear bond strength was measured, and failure modes were analyzed. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) combined with EDX analysis was performed to assess changes in the dentin surface. Results: The DD group showed the highest bond strength (11.15 ± 1.32 MPa), followed by PB (5.98 ± 1.79 MPa), the control group (5.08 ± 1.17 MPa), and FL (4.78 ± 0.75 MPa). TM showed the lowest value (4.09 ± 0.52 MPa). ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons confirmed significant differences, with DD outperforming all other groups (p < 0.001). Adhesive failure was the most common, followed by mixed-type failures. EDX results indicated increased mineral and decreased carbon content across all treated groups, most notably in the PB group. Discussion: Although bioactive desensitizers altered dentin composition, their inconsistent effect on bond strength may be attributed to the distinct microstructural changes each induces. Conclusion: Clinicians must carefully consider the balance between enhancing patient comfort and preserving the long-term integrity of the restoration.
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=20500195011&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.citationTurkistani, A., & Basheer, R. R. (2025). Influence of bioactive desensitizers on bonding of self-adhesive resin cement: a SEM/EDX Microanalysis study. The Open Dentistry Journal, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106409866250727110644
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106409866250727110644
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106409866250727110644
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.msa.edu.eg/handle/123456789/6532
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Open Dentistry Journal
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOpen Dentistry Journal; 2025 , Volume 19 , e18742106409866
dc.subjectDentin desensitizing agents
dc.subjectDentin hypersensitivity
dc.subjectResin cements
dc.subjectShear strength
dc.subjectSpectrometry
dc.subjectX-Ray emission.
dc.titleInfluence of Bioactive Desensitizers on Bonding of Self-adhesive Resin Cement: A SEM/EDX Microanalysis Study
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
e18742106409866.pdf
Size:
2.96 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
51 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: