Assessment of vertical ridge augmentation in anterior aesthetic zone using onlay xenografts with titanium mesh versus the inlay bone grafting technique: A randomized clinical trial

Simple item page
dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorMounir M.
dc.contributor.authorMounir S.
dc.contributor.authorAbou-Elfetouh A.
dc.contributor.authorShaker M.A.
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Dentistry
dc.contributor.otherOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department
dc.contributor.otherCairo University
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Faculty of Dentistry
dc.contributor.otherOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department
dc.contributor.otherM.S.A University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Faculty of Dentistry
dc.contributor.otherOral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department
dc.contributor.otherAl Faraby University
dc.contributor.otherJeddah
dc.contributor.otherSaudi Arabia
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T20:41:14Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T20:41:14Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.descriptionScopus
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the final vertical gain at the deficient anterior maxillary alveolar ridges using onlay bone grafts with titanium mesh versus inlay bone grafting. This was a single institutional randomized comparative clinical trial. The study population included 16 patients, with edentulous anterior maxillary alveolar ridges (40 implant sites) who were presented and treated at the Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine in Cairo University from September 2013 to August 2015. Selected patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. The control group received onlay particulate xenograft together with titanium mesh as a space-maintaining device while the study group received inlay block xenograft (sandwich osteotomy) fixed with mini-plates. Assessment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) included the mean percentage of vertical gain at the proposed implant sites after 6 months taken from cross-sectional cuts. A total of 40 delayed implant placements were done. Results showed that there was no statistical significance between the two groups (P = 0.2); the mean percentage of 6 months postoperative vertical bone gain in the control group was 20.7% and that in the study group was 31.6%. 2017 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeonsen_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=25629&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.04.021
dc.identifier.doiPubMed ID : 28526551
dc.identifier.issn9015027
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.04.021
dc.identifier.otherPubMed ID : 28526551
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/0EExO
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofseries46
dc.subjectanterior maxillaen_US
dc.subjectbone graftsen_US
dc.subjectinlayen_US
dc.subjectonlayen_US
dc.subjecttitanium meshen_US
dc.subjecttitaniumen_US
dc.subjecttitaniumen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectalveolar ridge augmentationen_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectbone transplantationen_US
dc.subjectclinical articleen_US
dc.subjectclinical outcomeen_US
dc.subjectcone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdental inlayen_US
dc.subjectdouble blind procedureen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectosteolysisen_US
dc.subjectpostoperative perioden_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectsurgical meshen_US
dc.subjectwound healingen_US
dc.subjectxenograften_US
dc.subjectalveolar ridge augmentationen_US
dc.subjectbone plateen_US
dc.subjectbone transplantationen_US
dc.subjectdental procedureen_US
dc.subjectedentulousnessen_US
dc.subjectmaxillaen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjectsurgical meshen_US
dc.subjecttreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subjectvertical dimension of occlusionen_US
dc.subjectxenograften_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAlveolar Ridge Augmentationen_US
dc.subjectBone Platesen_US
dc.subjectBone Transplantationen_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Methoden_US
dc.subjectEsthetics, Dentalen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHeterograftsen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectJaw, Edentulous, Partiallyen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMaxillaen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectSurgical Meshen_US
dc.subjectTitaniumen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectVertical Dimensionen_US
dc.titleAssessment of vertical ridge augmentation in anterior aesthetic zone using onlay xenografts with titanium mesh versus the inlay bone grafting technique: A randomized clinical trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.isReferencedByVon Arx, T., Wallkam, B., Hardt, N., Localized ridge augmentation using micro titanium mesh: a report on 27 implants followed from 1 to 3 years after functional loading (1998) Clin Oral Implants Res, 9, pp. 123-130; Her, S., Kang, T., Fien, M.J., Titanium mesh as an alternative to a membrane for ridge augmentation (2012) J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70, pp. 803-810; Jensen, O.T., Alveolar segmental sandwich osteotomies for posterior edentulous mandibular sites for dental implants (2006) J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 64, pp. 471-475; Bormann, K.H., Suarez-Cunqueiro, M.M., von See, C., Kokemuller, H., Schumann, P., Gellrich, N.C., Sandwich osteotomy for vertical and transversal augmentation of the posterior mandible (2010) Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 39, pp. 554-560; Frame, J.W., Browne, R.M., Brady, C.L., Biologic basis for interpositional autogenous bone grafts to the mandible (1982) J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 40, pp. 407-411; Tamimi, F., Torres, J., Gbureck, U., Lopez-Cabarcos, E., Bassett, D.C., Alkhraisat, M.H., Barralet, J.E., Craniofacial vertical bone augmentation: a comparison between 3D printed monolithic monetite blocks and autologous onlay grafts in the rabbit (2009) Biomaterials, 31, pp. 6318-6326; Scarano, A., Carinci, F., Assenza, B., Piattelli, M., Murmura, G., Piattelli, A., Vertical ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible using an inlay technique with a xenograft without miniscrews and miniplates: case series (2011) Clin Oral Impl Res, 22, pp. 1125-1130; Mounir, M., Beheiri, G., El-Beialy, W., Assessment of marginal bone loss using full thickness versus partial thickness flaps for alveolar ridge splitting and immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla (2014) Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 43, pp. 1373-1380; Louis, P.J., Gutta, R., Said-Al-Naief, N., Reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible with particulate bone graft and titanium mesh for implant placement (2008) J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 66, pp. 235-245; Ciocca, L., Fantini, M., De Crescenzio, F., Corinaldesi, G., Scotti, R., Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) of a customized titanium mesh for prosthetically guided bone regeneration of atrophic maxillary arches (2011) Med Biol Eng Comput, 49, pp. 1347-1352; Schettler, D., Holtermann, W., Clinical and experimental results of a sandwich-technique for mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation (1977) J Maxillofac Surg, 5, pp. 199-202
dcterms.sourceScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_128.png
Size:
2.73 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty Of Dentistry Research Paper