Multiple Debris Orbital Collision Avoidance

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorHamed A.R.
dc.contributor.authorBadawy A.
dc.contributor.authorOmer A.A.
dc.contributor.authorAshry M.
dc.contributor.authorHussein W.M.
dc.contributor.otherEgyptian Armed Forces
dc.contributor.otherSherok city
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; MSA
dc.contributor.otherOctober University for Modern Sciences and Arts
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Mechanical Engineering Department
dc.contributor.otherMTC
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Egyptian Armed Forces
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Egyptian Armed Forces
dc.contributor.otherSheraton square
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T20:40:39Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T20:40:39Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionScopus
dc.description.abstractRecently, Mission safety become an important concern because of the exponentially increment of space objects crossing or accompany the orbit. In such a situation the risk value becomes more and more as these controlled and uncontrolled objects increase. Therefore, mission control centers depend on organizations as joint space operation center to use their supplied information to schedule a smart plan to minimize the orbit risk. This paper proposes a new technique in the field of satellite safe trajectory incorporating orbital separation distance between different orbiting objects in artificial potential field method rather than position difference as in many cases the difference between them is enormous. Satellite surroundings are represented by artificial field where counterpart objects are represented by repulsive potentials, and future predicted path as an attractive field. Therefore, prospective planned maneuver considers all surrounding objects with different probability within the same algorithm. The proposed method is then applied to a real case between a Chinese 'cz-4' and the United States 'DMSP 5D-2 F7' satellites and show the results before and after applying the algorithm with calculations of the velocity required to escape risk situation and maintain the necessary orbital parameters. Finally, a comparative study is implemented to determine the effectiveness of the proposed method compared to the well-known Hohmann maneuver. � 2019 IEEE.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2019.8742114
dc.identifier.isbn9.78E+12
dc.identifier.issn1095323X
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2019.8742114
dc.identifier.urihttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8742114
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherIEEE Computer Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings
dc.relation.ispartofseries2019-March
dc.subjectSatellitesen_US
dc.subjectSpace debrisen_US
dc.subjectArtificial fielden_US
dc.subjectArtificial potential field methoden_US
dc.subjectComparative studiesen_US
dc.subjectMission control centersen_US
dc.subjectOrbital parametersen_US
dc.subjectRepulsive potentialsen_US
dc.subjectSeparation distancesen_US
dc.subjectSpace objectsen_US
dc.subjectOrbitsen_US
dc.titleMultiple Debris Orbital Collision Avoidanceen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dcterms.isReferencedByMigliorini, L.F., Graser, E., Osborne, D., Unmaneuverable to Maneuverable-Developing Collision Avoidance Operations for a 17 year old Satellite (2018) 2018 SpaceOps Conference, p. 2679; Adilov, N., Alexander, P.J., Cunningham, B.M., An economic kessler syndrome : A dynamic model of earth orbit debris (2018) Economics Letters, 166, pp. 79-82; Aida, S., Kirschner, M., Wermuth, M., Kiehling, R., Center, G.S.O., Collision avoidance operations for LEO satellites controlled by GSOC (2010) Space Operations: Exploration, Scientific Utilization, and Technology Development, p. 71; Abay, R., Collision avoidance dynamics for optimal impulsive collision avoidance maneuvers (2017) Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), 2017 8th International Conference on, pp. 263-271; Refaat, A., Badawy, A., Ashry, M., Omar, A., High accuracy spacecraft orbit propagator validation (2018) The 18th International Conference, , on Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering (AMME-2018), May 2018 2018; Bussy-Virat, C., Getchius, J., Ridley, A., The spacecraft orbital characterization kit and its applications to the cygnss mission (2018) 2018 Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, p. 1973; Jung, O.-C., Seong, J., Ahn, S., Conjunction assessment-flow automation support tool in kari: From design to operations (2018) 2018 SpaceOps Conference, p. 2373; Vallado, D., (2013) Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications; http://earthinfo.nga.mil/GandG/sathtml/eoppdoc36.html, N. G.-I. A. NGA. Earth Orientation Parameter Prediction (EOPP) Description; Badawy, A., McInnes, C.R., On-orbit assembly using superquadric potential fields (2008) Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 31, pp. 30-43; Badawy, A., McInnes, C.R., Small spacecraft formation using potential functions (2009) Acta Astronautica, 65, pp. 1783-1788; Radice, G., Autonomous slew manoeuvring and attitude control using the potential function method (2004) Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 116, pp. 1745-1765; Izzo, D., Pettazzi, L., Autonomous and distributed motion planning for satellite swarm (2007) Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 30, pp. 449-459; Lock, R.E., Bailey, Z.J., Kowalkowski, T.D., Nilsen, E.L., Mattingly, R.L., Mars sample return orbiter concepts using solar electric propulsion for the post-mars2020 decade (2014) Aerospace Conference, 2014 IEEE, pp. 1-10; Khatib, O., Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots (1986) Autonomous Robot Vehicles, pp. 396-404. , ed: Springer; Zhang, C., Fang, J., Li, B., Application of the improved artificial potential field method in obstacle avoidance of robot (2017) DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering; Zhiyang, L., Tao, J., Route planning based on improved artificial potential field method (2017) Intelligent Robot Systems (ACIRS), 2017 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on, pp. 196-199; Oltrogge, D., Alfano, S., Law, C., Cacioni, A., Kelso, T., A comprehensive assessment of collision likelihood in Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (2018) Acta Astronautica, 147, pp. 316-345; Lal, B., Balakrishnan, A., Caldwell, B.M., Buenconsejo, R.S., Carioscia, S.A., (2018) Global Trends in Space Situational Awareness (SSA) and Space Traffic Management (STM); Kannan, M.R., Manikantan, P., Kumar, D., Vasanth, S., Selvamani, S., Guruprasad, K., Collision avoidance assessment and mitigation measures for controlled geo/gso spacecrafts with orbital debris (2015) 7th European Conference on Space Debris, ESA/ESOC, , Darmstadt/Germany; Chen, L.B.X., Liang, Y.G., Li, K.B., Close approach analysis between space object (2017) Orbital Data Applications for Space Objects, , Springer Springer, Singapore; Channumsin, S., Udomthanatheera, P., Kositratpatcharasuk, C., Aorpimai, M., Development of an orbital trajectory analysis tool (2017) Engineering Journal, 21, pp. 123-139
dcterms.sourceScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_128.png
Size:
2.73 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description: