System dynamics as a useful technique for complex systems
dc.Affiliation | October University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA) | |
dc.contributor.author | Azar A.T. | |
dc.contributor.other | Department of Electrical Communication and Electronics Systems Engineering | |
dc.contributor.other | Modern Science and Arts University (MSA) | |
dc.contributor.other | 6th of October City | |
dc.contributor.other | Egypt | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-25T19:58:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-25T19:58:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.description | Scopus | |
dc.description.abstract | System dynamics (SD) is a powerful methodology and computer simulation modelling technique for framing, understanding and discussing complex issues and problems. It is widely used to analyse a range of systems in, e.g. business, ecology, medical and social systems as well as engineering. The methodology focuses on the way one quantity can affect others through the flow of physical entities and information. Often such flows come back to the original quantity causing a feedback loop. The behaviour of the system is governed by these feedback loops. There are two important advantages of taking systems dynamics approach. The interrelationship of the different elements of the systems can be easily seen in terms of cause and effects. Thus the true cause of the behaviour can be identified. The other advantage is that it possible to investigate which parameters or structures need to be changed in order to improve behaviour. This paper deals with the design of a framework for SD models and gives an overview of the current SD simulation packages. Copyright � 2012 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=5800179616&tip=sid&clean=0 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2012.046298 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 17485037 | |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2012.046298 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://cutt.ly/tr1pNGu | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 10 | |
dc.subject | Causal-loop diagram | en_US |
dc.subject | Dynamic complexity | en_US |
dc.subject | Feedback | en_US |
dc.subject | Mental models | en_US |
dc.subject | Modelling methodology | en_US |
dc.subject | Policy resistance | en_US |
dc.subject | SD | en_US |
dc.subject | Sensitivity analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Stock and flow diagram | en_US |
dc.subject | System dynamics | en_US |
dc.subject | System dynamics validation | en_US |
dc.subject | Causal-loop diagram | en_US |
dc.subject | Dynamic complexity | en_US |
dc.subject | Flow diagram | en_US |
dc.subject | Mental model | en_US |
dc.subject | Modelling methodology | en_US |
dc.subject | SD | en_US |
dc.subject | System Dynamics | en_US |
dc.subject | Computer simulation | en_US |
dc.subject | Feedback | en_US |
dc.subject | Sensitivity analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | System theory | en_US |
dc.title | System dynamics as a useful technique for complex systems | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dcterms.isReferencedBy | Andersen, D., Morecroft, J., Spencer, R., Forrester, J., Karsky, M., Paulre, B., Pugh, J., Wolstenholme, E., How the System dynamics society came to be: A collective memoir (2007) System Dynamics Review, 23 (2-3), pp. 219-227. , DOI 10.1002/sdr.367, Exploring tne Next Great Frontier: System Dynamics at 50; Andersen, D.F., Richardson, G.P., Scripts for group model building (1997) System Dynamics Review, 13 (2), pp. 107-129; Andersen, D.F., Richardson, G.P., Vennix, J.A.M., Group model building: Adding more science to the craft (1997) System Dynamics Review, 13 (2), pp. 187-201; Balci, O., Principles and techniques of simulation validation, verification, and testing, ACM press (1995) Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Winter Simulation, pp. 147-154; Baines, T.S., Harrison, D.K., Kay, J.M., Hamblin, D.J., A consideration of modelling techniques that can be used to evaluate manufacturing strategies (1998) International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 14 (5), pp. 369-375; Blanchard, B.S., Fabrycky, W.J., (1998) Systems Engineering and Analysis, , Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; Brailsford, S., Hilton, N., A comparison of discrete event simulation and system dynamics for modelling health-care systems (2001) Proceedings of the 26th Meeting of the ORAHS Working Group 2000, pp. 18-39. , J. Riley (Ed.), Glasgow, Scotland: Glasgow Caledonian University; Breierova, L., Choudhari, M., (1996) An Introduction to Sensitivity Analysis (D-4526), System Dynamics in Education Project, pp. 41-107. , System Dynamics Group, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Coyle, G., Qualitative and quantitative modelling in system dynamics: Some research questions (2000) System Dynamics Review, 16 (3), pp. 225-244. , DOI 10.1002/1099-1727(200023)16:3<225 | |
dcterms.source | Scopus |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- avatar_scholar_256.png
- Size:
- 6.31 KB
- Format:
- Portable Network Graphics
- Description: