Impact of removable partial denture type on patient satisfaction and abutment survival rate-RCT

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorSadek S.A.
dc.contributor.authorElawady D.
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Prosthodontics
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Oral and Dental Medicine
dc.contributor.otherCairo University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Department of Prosthodontics
dc.contributor.otherAlfarabi Private College for Dentistry and Nursing
dc.contributor.otherJeddah
dc.contributor.otherSaudi Arabia; Department of Prosthodontics
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Dentistry
dc.contributor.otherModern Science and Arts University (MSA)
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Department of Prosthodontics
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Oral and Dental Medicine
dc.contributor.otherCairo University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T20:40:34Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T20:40:34Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionScopus
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Patient�s satisfaction and the preservation of abutments is the most important outcomes that the clinician seeks during fabrication of any dental treatment, especially when it is concerned with removable prosthodontic rehabilitation. AIM: The present study evaluates three different Removable Partial Denture (RPD) types restoring mandibular class II modification I edentulous cases with regards to patient�s satisfaction and abutments survival. METHODS: Forty-two partially edentulous patients were divided into three groups (Group I rehabilitated with Vitallium RPD, Group II rehabilitated with Vitallium RPD where the modification area restored with the surveyed bridge, Group III rehabilitated with Thermopress RPD). The patients were followed up for twenty-four months. Using a questionnaire, prosthodontic maintenance required was documented at the delivery and after 3 months. RESULTS: There was a significant difference regarding patient satisfaction for group III (P-value <0.05) while for groups I and II there was a non-significant difference (P-value >0.05). Regarding the survival rate, there was a non-significant difference between the three groups (P-value >0.05) at the end of twenty-four months of follow up. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction and abutment survival were better with Thermopress RPD than conventional Vitallium RPD or Vitallium RPD with a surveyed bridge restoring the modification area. Although a non-statistically significant difference was found in the survival rate of abutments between groups, a clinically important result was revealed as no abutments failures were reported in the Thermopress group. � 2019 Sherif A. Sadek, Dina Elawady.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21100824403&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.668
dc.identifier.doiPubMed ID :
dc.identifier.issn18579655
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.668
dc.identifier.otherPubMed ID :
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/kNNVA
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherOpen Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOpen Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences
dc.relation.ispartofseries7
dc.subjectOctober University for Modern Sciences and Arts
dc.subjectUniversity for Modern Sciences and Arts
dc.subjectMSA University
dc.subjectجامعة أكتوبر للعلوم الحديثة والآداب
dc.subjectBone lossen_US
dc.subjectPatient�s satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectRemovable partial denturesen_US
dc.subjectThermopress materialen_US
dc.subjectvitalliumen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectchewing function assessmenten_US
dc.subjectchewing function disorderen_US
dc.subjectChewing Function Quality Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectclinical articleen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdental scalingen_US
dc.subjectdental surgeryen_US
dc.subjectdenture hygieneen_US
dc.subjectedentulousnessen_US
dc.subjectfollow upen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectLikert scaleen_US
dc.subjectmaxillary third molaren_US
dc.subjectmouth hygieneen_US
dc.subjectoral health outcome measureen_US
dc.subjectOral Health Related Quality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectoutcome assessmenten_US
dc.subjectoverall survivalen_US
dc.subjectpanoramic radiographyen_US
dc.subjectpatient satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectquestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectShort Form 12en_US
dc.subjectsocial psychologyen_US
dc.subjectsurvival analysisen_US
dc.subjectsurvival rateen_US
dc.subjecttooth diseaseen_US
dc.subjecttooth occlusionen_US
dc.subjectvisual analog scaleen_US
dc.titleImpact of removable partial denture type on patient satisfaction and abutment survival rate-RCTen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.isReferencedByMcGivney, G.P., Carr, A.B., Brown, T.D., (2005) McCracken�s Removable Partial Prosthodontics. 11Thed, pp. 287-291. , The C.V. Mosby Co. St. Louis, Missouri; Holmes, J.B., Influence of impression procedures and occlusal loading on partial denture movement (2001) J Prosthet Dent, 86, p. 335. , https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119826; D�Souza, D.S., Dua, P., Rehabilitation strategies for partially edentulous-prosthodontic principles and current trends (2011) Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 67 (3), pp. 296-298. , https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(11)60068-3; Janus, C.E., Hunt, R.J., Unger, J.W., Survey of prosthodontic service provided by general dentists in virginia (2007) J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp. 287-291. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.011; Dolan, T.A., Gilbert, G.H., Duncan, R.P., Foerster, U., Risk indicators of edentulism, partial tooth loss and prosthetic status among black and white middle-aged and older adults (2001) Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 29, pp. 329-340. , https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290502.x; Hundal, M., Madan, R., Comparative clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures made of two different materials in Kennedy Applegate class II partially edentulous situation (2015) Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 71, pp. S306-S312. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.08.020; Thakral, G.K., Aeran, H., Yadav, B., Thakral, R., Flexible partial dentures-A hope for the challenged mouth (2012) Peoples J Sci Res, 5, pp. 17-23; Singh, L., Kaira, S.L., Dayakara, H.R., Singh, R., Flexible denture for partially edentulous arches - A case report (2012) J Dentofacial Sci, 1, pp. 39-42; Phoenix, R.D., Mansueto, M.A., Ackerman, N.A., Jones, R.E., Evaluation of mechanical and thermal properties of commonly used denture base resins (2004) J Prosthodont, 13, pp. 17-27. , https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04002.x; Hundal, M., Madan, R., Comparative clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures made of two different materials in kennedy applegate class II partially edentulous situation (2012) Med J Armed Forces India, 71, pp. S306-S312. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.08.020; Abuzar, M.A., Bellur, S., Duong, N., Kim, B.B., Lu, P., Palfreyman, N., Evaluating surface roughness of a polyamide denture base material in comparison with poly (Methyl methacrylate) (2010) J Oral Sci, 52, pp. 577-581. , https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.577; Dyer, S.R., Lassila, L.V., Jokinen, M., Vallittu, P.K., Effect of cross-sectional design on the modulus of elasticity and toughness of fiber-reinforced composite materials (2005) J Prosthet Dent, 94, pp. 219-226. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.06.008; Abuzar, M.A., Bellur, S., Duong, N., Kim, B.B., Lu, P., Palfreyman, N., Evaluating surface roughness of a polyamide denture base material in comparison with poly (Methyl methacrylate) (2010) J Oral Sci, 52, pp. 577-581. , https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.577; Larnier, A., (2012) Partial Dentures. Dental Procedures, Dental Articles; Knezovi, D.�.-Z., Patients� Satisfaction with Partial Denture Therapy (2000) Acta Stomat Croat, 34, pp. 373-378; Kamber-Cesir, A., Dzonlagic, A., Ajanovic, M., Delalic, A., Assessment of patient�s satisfaction with the partial removable denture therapy (2011) Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Cl�nica Integrada, 11 (2), pp. 171-175. , https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2011.112.04; Turner, M., Hyposalivation, xerostomia and the complete denture - A systematic review (2008) JADA, 139 (2), pp. 146-150. , https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0129; Green, A.J., Influence of diuretics on complete denture retention (1980) J Prosth Dent, 43 (5), p. 506. , https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90320-0; John, R., Ivanhoe, N., Roman, M., Treating the modern complete denture patient (2002) J Prosth Dent, 88, p. 631. , https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.130147; Chung-Jae, L., Sung-Bem, B., Ji-Young, B., Hae-Hyoung, L.E.E., Comparative adaptation accuracy of acrylic denture bases evaluated by two different methods (2010) Dent Mater J, 29 (4), pp. 411-417. , https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-105, 412; Akinyamoju, C.A., Ogunrinde, T.J., Taiwo, J.O., Dosumu, O.O., Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Acrylic and Flexible Partial Dentures (2017) Niger Postgrad Med J, 24 (3), pp. 144-149. , https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17; El-Khodary, M., El-Din, S., Thermoplastic Distal Extension Removable Partial Dentures versus Vitallium ones Radiographic Evaluation (2014) Mansoura Journal of Dentistry, 1 (3), pp. 20-23; Campbell, S.D., Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation (2017) J Prosthet Dent, 118 (3), pp. 273-280. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008; Zlataric, D.K., Celebic, A.-P.M., The effect of removable partial dentures on periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth (2002) J Periodontol, 73, pp. 137-144. , https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.2.137; Sato, F., Koyama, S., Chiba, T., Kadowaki, K., Kawata, T., Sasaki, K., Changes in periodontal conditions of remaining teeth five years after RPD placement (2009) Annals of Japan Prosthodontic Society, 1, pp. 130-138. , https://doi.org/10.2186/ajps.1.130; Bergman, B., Hugoson, A., Olsson, C.O., Caries, periodontal and prosthetic findings in patients with removable partial dentures: A ten-year longitudinal study (1982) J Prosthet Dent, 48, pp. 506-514. , https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90352-3; Jepson, N., Moynihan, P.J., Kelly, P.J., Waston, G.W., Thomason, J.M., Caries incidence following restoration of shortened lower dental arches in a randomized controlled trial (2001) Br Dent J, 191, pp. 140-144. , https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801122; Matsuda, K., Ikebe, K., Enoki, K., Tada, S., Fujiwara, K., Maeda, Y., Incidence and association of root fractures after prosthetic treatment (2011) J Prosthodont Res, 55, pp. 137-140. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2010.10.003; Miyamoto, T., Morgano, S.M., Kumagai, T., Jones, J.A., Nunn, M.E., Treatment history of teeth in relation to the longevity of the teeth and their restorations: Outcomes of teeth treated and maintained for 15 years (2007) J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp. 150-156. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.01.007; Tada, S., Ikebe, K., Matsuda, K., Maeda, Y., Multifactorial risk assessment for survival of abutments of removable partial dentures based on practice-based longitudinal study (2013) J Dent, 41 (12), pp. 1175-1180. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.018; Bissada, N., Ibrahim, S., Barsoum, W., Gingival responses to various types of removable partial dentures (1974) J Perio, 45, p. 651. , https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1974.45.9.651; Bergman, B., Hugoson, A., Olsson, C., Caries, periodontal and prosthetic findings in patients with removable partial dentures: A ten-year longitudinal study (1982) J Prosthet Dent, 48, pp. 506-514. , https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90352-3
dcterms.sourceScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_256.png
Size:
6.31 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
OAMJMS-7-2513.pdf
Size:
579.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: