Impact of removable partial denture type on patient satisfaction and abutment survival rate-RCT
dc.Affiliation | October University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA) | |
dc.contributor.author | Sadek S.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Elawady D. | |
dc.contributor.other | Department of Prosthodontics | |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo University | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo | |
dc.contributor.other | Egypt; Department of Prosthodontics | |
dc.contributor.other | Alfarabi Private College for Dentistry and Nursing | |
dc.contributor.other | Jeddah | |
dc.contributor.other | Saudi Arabia; Department of Prosthodontics | |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Dentistry | |
dc.contributor.other | Modern Science and Arts University (MSA) | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo | |
dc.contributor.other | Egypt; Department of Prosthodontics | |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo University | |
dc.contributor.other | Cairo | |
dc.contributor.other | Egypt | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-09T20:40:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-09T20:40:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.description | Scopus | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Patient�s satisfaction and the preservation of abutments is the most important outcomes that the clinician seeks during fabrication of any dental treatment, especially when it is concerned with removable prosthodontic rehabilitation. AIM: The present study evaluates three different Removable Partial Denture (RPD) types restoring mandibular class II modification I edentulous cases with regards to patient�s satisfaction and abutments survival. METHODS: Forty-two partially edentulous patients were divided into three groups (Group I rehabilitated with Vitallium RPD, Group II rehabilitated with Vitallium RPD where the modification area restored with the surveyed bridge, Group III rehabilitated with Thermopress RPD). The patients were followed up for twenty-four months. Using a questionnaire, prosthodontic maintenance required was documented at the delivery and after 3 months. RESULTS: There was a significant difference regarding patient satisfaction for group III (P-value <0.05) while for groups I and II there was a non-significant difference (P-value >0.05). Regarding the survival rate, there was a non-significant difference between the three groups (P-value >0.05) at the end of twenty-four months of follow up. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction and abutment survival were better with Thermopress RPD than conventional Vitallium RPD or Vitallium RPD with a surveyed bridge restoring the modification area. Although a non-statistically significant difference was found in the survival rate of abutments between groups, a clinically important result was revealed as no abutments failures were reported in the Thermopress group. � 2019 Sherif A. Sadek, Dina Elawady. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21100824403&tip=sid&clean=0 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.668 | |
dc.identifier.doi | PubMed ID : | |
dc.identifier.issn | 18579655 | |
dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.668 | |
dc.identifier.other | PubMed ID : | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://t.ly/kNNVA | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 7 | |
dc.subject | October University for Modern Sciences and Arts | |
dc.subject | University for Modern Sciences and Arts | |
dc.subject | MSA University | |
dc.subject | جامعة أكتوبر للعلوم الحديثة والآداب | |
dc.subject | Bone loss | en_US |
dc.subject | Patient�s satisfaction | en_US |
dc.subject | Removable partial dentures | en_US |
dc.subject | Thermopress material | en_US |
dc.subject | vitallium | en_US |
dc.subject | adult | en_US |
dc.subject | Article | en_US |
dc.subject | chewing function assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | chewing function disorder | en_US |
dc.subject | Chewing Function Quality Questionnaire | en_US |
dc.subject | clinical article | en_US |
dc.subject | controlled study | en_US |
dc.subject | dental scaling | en_US |
dc.subject | dental surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | denture hygiene | en_US |
dc.subject | edentulousness | en_US |
dc.subject | follow up | en_US |
dc.subject | human | en_US |
dc.subject | Likert scale | en_US |
dc.subject | maxillary third molar | en_US |
dc.subject | mouth hygiene | en_US |
dc.subject | oral health outcome measure | en_US |
dc.subject | Oral Health Related Quality of Life | en_US |
dc.subject | outcome assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | overall survival | en_US |
dc.subject | panoramic radiography | en_US |
dc.subject | patient satisfaction | en_US |
dc.subject | quality of life | en_US |
dc.subject | questionnaire | en_US |
dc.subject | randomized controlled trial | en_US |
dc.subject | Short Form 12 | en_US |
dc.subject | social psychology | en_US |
dc.subject | survival analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | survival rate | en_US |
dc.subject | tooth disease | en_US |
dc.subject | tooth occlusion | en_US |
dc.subject | visual analog scale | en_US |
dc.title | Impact of removable partial denture type on patient satisfaction and abutment survival rate-RCT | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dcterms.isReferencedBy | McGivney, G.P., Carr, A.B., Brown, T.D., (2005) McCracken�s Removable Partial Prosthodontics. 11Thed, pp. 287-291. , The C.V. Mosby Co. St. Louis, Missouri; Holmes, J.B., Influence of impression procedures and occlusal loading on partial denture movement (2001) J Prosthet Dent, 86, p. 335. , https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119826; D�Souza, D.S., Dua, P., Rehabilitation strategies for partially edentulous-prosthodontic principles and current trends (2011) Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 67 (3), pp. 296-298. , https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(11)60068-3; Janus, C.E., Hunt, R.J., Unger, J.W., Survey of prosthodontic service provided by general dentists in virginia (2007) J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp. 287-291. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.011; Dolan, T.A., Gilbert, G.H., Duncan, R.P., Foerster, U., Risk indicators of edentulism, partial tooth loss and prosthetic status among black and white middle-aged and older adults (2001) Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 29, pp. 329-340. , https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290502.x; Hundal, M., Madan, R., Comparative clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures made of two different materials in Kennedy Applegate class II partially edentulous situation (2015) Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 71, pp. S306-S312. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.08.020; Thakral, G.K., Aeran, H., Yadav, B., Thakral, R., Flexible partial dentures-A hope for the challenged mouth (2012) Peoples J Sci Res, 5, pp. 17-23; Singh, L., Kaira, S.L., Dayakara, H.R., Singh, R., Flexible denture for partially edentulous arches - A case report (2012) J Dentofacial Sci, 1, pp. 39-42; Phoenix, R.D., Mansueto, M.A., Ackerman, N.A., Jones, R.E., Evaluation of mechanical and thermal properties of commonly used denture base resins (2004) J Prosthodont, 13, pp. 17-27. , https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04002.x; Hundal, M., Madan, R., Comparative clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures made of two different materials in kennedy applegate class II partially edentulous situation (2012) Med J Armed Forces India, 71, pp. S306-S312. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.08.020; Abuzar, M.A., Bellur, S., Duong, N., Kim, B.B., Lu, P., Palfreyman, N., Evaluating surface roughness of a polyamide denture base material in comparison with poly (Methyl methacrylate) (2010) J Oral Sci, 52, pp. 577-581. , https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.577; Dyer, S.R., Lassila, L.V., Jokinen, M., Vallittu, P.K., Effect of cross-sectional design on the modulus of elasticity and toughness of fiber-reinforced composite materials (2005) J Prosthet Dent, 94, pp. 219-226. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.06.008; Abuzar, M.A., Bellur, S., Duong, N., Kim, B.B., Lu, P., Palfreyman, N., Evaluating surface roughness of a polyamide denture base material in comparison with poly (Methyl methacrylate) (2010) J Oral Sci, 52, pp. 577-581. , https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.577; Larnier, A., (2012) Partial Dentures. Dental Procedures, Dental Articles; Knezovi, D.�.-Z., Patients� Satisfaction with Partial Denture Therapy (2000) Acta Stomat Croat, 34, pp. 373-378; Kamber-Cesir, A., Dzonlagic, A., Ajanovic, M., Delalic, A., Assessment of patient�s satisfaction with the partial removable denture therapy (2011) Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria E Cl�nica Integrada, 11 (2), pp. 171-175. , https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2011.112.04; Turner, M., Hyposalivation, xerostomia and the complete denture - A systematic review (2008) JADA, 139 (2), pp. 146-150. , https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0129; Green, A.J., Influence of diuretics on complete denture retention (1980) J Prosth Dent, 43 (5), p. 506. , https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90320-0; John, R., Ivanhoe, N., Roman, M., Treating the modern complete denture patient (2002) J Prosth Dent, 88, p. 631. , https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.130147; Chung-Jae, L., Sung-Bem, B., Ji-Young, B., Hae-Hyoung, L.E.E., Comparative adaptation accuracy of acrylic denture bases evaluated by two different methods (2010) Dent Mater J, 29 (4), pp. 411-417. , https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-105, 412; Akinyamoju, C.A., Ogunrinde, T.J., Taiwo, J.O., Dosumu, O.O., Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Acrylic and Flexible Partial Dentures (2017) Niger Postgrad Med J, 24 (3), pp. 144-149. , https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_17; El-Khodary, M., El-Din, S., Thermoplastic Distal Extension Removable Partial Dentures versus Vitallium ones Radiographic Evaluation (2014) Mansoura Journal of Dentistry, 1 (3), pp. 20-23; Campbell, S.D., Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation (2017) J Prosthet Dent, 118 (3), pp. 273-280. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008; Zlataric, D.K., Celebic, A.-P.M., The effect of removable partial dentures on periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth (2002) J Periodontol, 73, pp. 137-144. , https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.2.137; Sato, F., Koyama, S., Chiba, T., Kadowaki, K., Kawata, T., Sasaki, K., Changes in periodontal conditions of remaining teeth five years after RPD placement (2009) Annals of Japan Prosthodontic Society, 1, pp. 130-138. , https://doi.org/10.2186/ajps.1.130; Bergman, B., Hugoson, A., Olsson, C.O., Caries, periodontal and prosthetic findings in patients with removable partial dentures: A ten-year longitudinal study (1982) J Prosthet Dent, 48, pp. 506-514. , https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90352-3; Jepson, N., Moynihan, P.J., Kelly, P.J., Waston, G.W., Thomason, J.M., Caries incidence following restoration of shortened lower dental arches in a randomized controlled trial (2001) Br Dent J, 191, pp. 140-144. , https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801122; Matsuda, K., Ikebe, K., Enoki, K., Tada, S., Fujiwara, K., Maeda, Y., Incidence and association of root fractures after prosthetic treatment (2011) J Prosthodont Res, 55, pp. 137-140. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2010.10.003; Miyamoto, T., Morgano, S.M., Kumagai, T., Jones, J.A., Nunn, M.E., Treatment history of teeth in relation to the longevity of the teeth and their restorations: Outcomes of teeth treated and maintained for 15 years (2007) J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp. 150-156. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.01.007; Tada, S., Ikebe, K., Matsuda, K., Maeda, Y., Multifactorial risk assessment for survival of abutments of removable partial dentures based on practice-based longitudinal study (2013) J Dent, 41 (12), pp. 1175-1180. , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.018; Bissada, N., Ibrahim, S., Barsoum, W., Gingival responses to various types of removable partial dentures (1974) J Perio, 45, p. 651. , https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1974.45.9.651; Bergman, B., Hugoson, A., Olsson, C., Caries, periodontal and prosthetic findings in patients with removable partial dentures: A ten-year longitudinal study (1982) J Prosthet Dent, 48, pp. 506-514. , https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90352-3 | |
dcterms.source | Scopus |