Effect of Implant Position on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A 1-Year Prospective Study

Simple item page
dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorELsyad M.A.
dc.contributor.authorMaryod W.H.
dc.contributor.authorMostafa A.Z.
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Dentistry
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Mansoura
dc.contributor.otherEldakahlia
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Department of Removable Prosthodontics
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Dentistry
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Modern Science and Arts
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Department of Removable Prosthodontics
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Dentistry
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Hail
dc.contributor.otherHail
dc.contributor.otherSaudi Arabia
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T20:40:41Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T20:40:41Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionScopus
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the influence of implant position on clinical and radiographic outcomes of Locator-retained mandibular overdentures. Materials and Methods: Fifteen edentulous participants with compromised bone at canine regions of the mandible were given 2 implants in the premolar areas (study group, PM). The control group (CA) consisted of 15 participants who received 2 implants in the canine regions, matched to PM and assigned as historical control. For study and control groups, mandibular dentures were constructed and attached to the fixtures with Locator attachments using the delayed loading protocol. Clinical (plaque scores, gingival scores, pocket depth, and implant stability) and radiographic (marginal bone loss) outcomes were assessed after denture delivery (T0), 6 months (T6), and 12 months (T12) later. Results: The survival rate was 100% in both groups. All clinical and radiographic parameters increased significantly with time. No significant difference in plaque scores, gingival scores, or implant stability between groups was observed. PM group recorded significantly higher pocket depth and marginal bone loss than CA group at T6 and T12. Conclusions: Within the limits of this short-term clinical study, canine position for implants retaining mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments is preferred over the first premolar position, as it was associated with reduced peri-implant pocket depth and marginal bone loss after 1 year. � 2018 by the American College of Prosthodontistsen_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=26177&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12780
dc.identifier.doiPubMed ID : 29508498
dc.identifier.issn1059941X
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12780
dc.identifier.otherPubMed ID : 29508498
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/geepJ
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Prosthodontics
dc.relation.ispartofseries28
dc.subjectOctober University for Modern Sciences and Arts
dc.subjectUniversity for Modern Sciences and Arts
dc.subjectMSA University
dc.subjectجامعة أكتوبر للعلوم الحديثة والآداب
dc.subjectClinicalen_US
dc.subjectimplant positionen_US
dc.subjectLocator attachmentsen_US
dc.subjectmandibularen_US
dc.subjectoverdenturesen_US
dc.subjectradiographicen_US
dc.subjectadverse device effecten_US
dc.subjectalveolar bone lossen_US
dc.subjectdental abutmenten_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic imagingen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectimplant-supported dentureen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmandibleen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectoverlay dentureen_US
dc.subjectplaque indexen_US
dc.subjectprospective studyen_US
dc.subjecttime factoren_US
dc.subjecttooth radiographyen_US
dc.subjectAlveolar Bone Lossen_US
dc.subjectDental Abutmentsen_US
dc.subjectDental Implant-Abutment Designen_US
dc.subjectDental Plaque Indexen_US
dc.subjectDental Prosthesis, Implant-Supporteden_US
dc.subjectDenture, Overlayen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMandibleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectRadiography, Dentalen_US
dc.subjectTime Factorsen_US
dc.titleEffect of Implant Position on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A 1-Year Prospective Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.isReferencedByThomason, J.M., Feine, J., Exley, C., Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients�the York Consensus Statement (2009) Br Dent J, 207, pp. 185-186; Elsyad, M.A., Khairallah, A.S., Shawky, A.F., Changes in the edentulous maxilla with ball and telescopic attachments of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 4-year retrospective study (2013) Quintessence Int, 44, pp. 487-495; Elsyad, M.A., Ashmawy, T.M., Faramawy, A.G., The influence of resilient liner and clip attachments for bar-implant-retained mandibular overdentures on opposing maxillary ridge. A 5-year randomised clinical trial (2014) J Oral Rehabil, 41, pp. 69-77; Gotfredsen, K., Holm, B., Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study (2000) Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp. 125-130; Trakas, T., Michalakis, K., Kang, K., Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review (2006) Implant Dent, 15, pp. 24-34; ELsyad, M.A., Errabti, H.M., Mustafa, A.Z., Mandibular denture base deformation with Locator and ball attachments of implant-retained overdentures (2016) J Prosthodont, 25, pp. 656-664; Nguyen, C.T., Masri, R., Driscoll, C.F., The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink Locator attachments: an in vitro study (2010) J Prosthodont, 19, pp. 226-230; Sadig, W., A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures (2009) Quintessence Int, 40, pp. 313-319; ELsyad, M.A., Setta, F.A., Khirallah, A.S., Strains around distally inclined implants retaining mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments. An in vitro study (2016) J Adv Prothodont, 8, pp. 116-124; Elsyad, M.A., Elsaih, E.A., Khairallah, A.S., Marginal bone resorption around immediate and delayed loaded implants supporting a locator-retained mandibular overdenture. A 1-year randomised controlled trial (2014) J Oral Rehabil, 41, pp. 608-618; Elsyad, M.A., Mahanna, F.F., Elshahat, M.A., Locators versus magnetic attachment effect on peri-implant tissue health of immediate loaded two implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: a 1-year randomised trial (2016) J Oral Rehabil, 43, pp. 297-305; ELsyad, M.A., Hammouda, N.I., Expansion of mandibular knife-edge ridge and simultaneous implant placement to retain overdentures: one-year clinical and radiographic results of a prospective study (2017) Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 19, pp. 167-179; Burns, D.R., Unger, J.W., Elswick, R.K., Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures. Part I: retention, stability, and tissue response (1995) J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp. 354-363; Thiel, C.P., Evans, D.B., Burnett, R.R., Combination syndrome associated with a mandibular implant-supported overdenture: a clinical report (1996) J Prosthet Dent, 75, pp. 107-113; Hong, H.R., Pae, A., Kim, Y., Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis (2012) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp. e69-76; Chung, K.H., Chung, C.Y., Cagna, D.R., Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures (2004) J Prosthodont, 13, pp. 221-226; Araujo, M.G., Lindhe, J., Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog (2005) J Clin Periodontol, 32, pp. 212-218; Schropp, L., Wenzel, A., Kostopoulos, L., Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study (2003) Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 23, pp. 313-323; Suh, J.J., Shelemay, A., Choi, S.H., Alveolar ridge splitting: a new microsaw technique (2005) Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 25, pp. 165-171; Scherer, M.D., McGlumphy, E.A., Seghi, R.R., Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution (2013) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp. 1619-1628; Lekholm, U., Zarb, G., Patient selection and preparation (1985) Tissue Integrated Prosthesis: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry, pp. 199-209. , Branemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, (eds), Chicago, Quintessence; Albrektsson, T., Zarb, G., Worthington, P., The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success (1986) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp. 11-25; Mombelli, A., van Oosten, M.A., Schurch, E., Jr., The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants (1987) Oral Microbiol Immunol, 2, pp. 145-151; Meredith, N., Alleyne, D., Cawley, P., Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis (1996) Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp. 261-267; Glauser, R., Sennerby, L., Meredith, N., Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs. failing implants (2004) Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp. 428-434; El-Sheikh, A.M., Shihabuddin, O.F., Ghoraba, S.M., Two versus three narrow-diameter implants with locator attachments supporting mandibular overdentures: a two-year prospective study (2012) Int J Dent, 2012, p. 285684; Maniewicz, S., Buser, R., Duvernay, E., Short dental implants retaining two-implant mandibular overdentures in very old, dependent patients: radiologic and clinical observation up to 5 years (2017) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 32, pp. 415-422; Alsabeeha, N.H., Payne, A.G., De Silva, R.K., Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems (2011) Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp. 330-337; Cordaro, L., di Torresanto, V.M., Petricevic, N., Single unit attachments improve peri-implant soft tissue conditions in mandibular overdentures supported by four implants (2013) Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp. 536-542; Quirynen, M., van Steenberghe, D., Jacobs, R., The reliability of pocket probing around screw-type implants (1991) Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp. 186-192; Pae, A., Kim, J.W., Kwon, K.R., Immediate loading of two implants supporting a magnet attachment-retained overdenture: one-year clinical study (2010) Implant Dent, 19, pp. 428-436; Hohlweg-Majert, B., Metzger, M.C., Kummer, T., Morphometric analysis�cone beam computed tomography to predict bone quality and quantity (2011) J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 39, pp. 330-334; Albrektsson, T., Zarb, G.A., Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance (1993) Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp. 95-105; Zarb, G.A., Albrektsson, T., Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants (1998) J Prosthet Dent, 80, p. 641; Liu, J., Pan, S., Dong, J., Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis (2013) J Dent, 41, pp. 241-249; Celik, G., Uludag, B., Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures (2007) J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp. 229-235; Chikunov, I., Doan, P., Vahidi, F., Implant-retained partial overdenture with resilient attachments (2008) J Prosthodont, 17, pp. 141-148; ELsyad, M.A., Mohamed, S.S., Shawky, A.F., Posterior mandibular ridge resorption with resilient liner and clip attachments of bar/implant retained overdentures. A 7-year retrospective radiographic study (2017) Int J Prosthodont, 30, pp. 260-265; Sadowsky, S.J., Caputo, A.A., Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs (2004) J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp. 328-336; Mericske-Stern, R., Forces on implants supporting overdentures: a preliminary study of morphologic and cephalometric considerations (1993) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp. 254-263; Elsyad, M.A., Abid, K.S., Elkhalek, E.A., Effect of buccal implant inclination on stresses around two-implant-retained overdentures with resilient stud attachments (2017) Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 32, pp. e135-e142; Elsyad, M.A., Eltowery, S.M., Gebreel, A.A., Peri-implant strain around mesially inclined two implants retaining mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments (2017) J Oral Sci, 59 (4), pp. 483-490; ELsyad, M., Omran, A.O., Fouad, M.M., Strains around abutment teeth with different attachments used for implant-assisted distal extension partial overdentures: an in vitro study (2017) J Prosthodont, 26, pp. 42-47
dcterms.sourceScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_256.png
Size:
6.31 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty Of Dentistry Research Paper