Comparison of different methods of abutment splinting and attachments on teeth kinetics (Part I)

dc.AffiliationOctober University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA)
dc.contributor.authorElsherbini A.N.
dc.contributor.authorNiedermeier W.
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Prosthodontics
dc.contributor.otherModern Sciences and Arts University
dc.contributor.otherCairo
dc.contributor.otherEgypt; Department of Prosthodontics
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Cologne
dc.contributor.otherCologne
dc.contributor.otherGermany
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T20:41:18Z
dc.date.available2020-01-09T20:41:18Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.descriptionScopus
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study was to measure the effect of different attachments: telescopic crown, double Akers� (DA) clasp, distal clasp (DC)-retained removable partial dentures (RPDs), and cantilever bridge on the intrusive movement of the abutment teeth. Materials and methods: A model imitating mandibular ridge of Kennedy Class I was fabricated with first and second premolar as abutments. A telescopic crown, DA, DC-retained RPDs, and cantilever bridge were fabricated. Each partial denture was placed at a time on the model; 50 N force was applied on each partial denture using ZWICK universal testing machine. The intrusion of the abutments was recorded using SOLARTON device. Data were collected and tabulated. Results: The mean values of the intrusive movement in telescopic separated (TS) RPD, telescopic joined (TJ) RPD, DA RPD, DC RPD, and cantilever bridge in tooth 35 were 147, 75, 57, 334, and 307 �m respectively, and in tooth 45 were 136, 81, 65, 435, and 335 �m respectively. Conclusion: It can be concluded from the retrieved data that DA clasp-retained RPD caused less intrusion of the abutments than telescopic crown-retained RPD, followed by the DC than cantilever bridge. Clinical significance: The DA clasp is most favorable in the utilization in mandibular Kennedy Class I situation followed by telescopic crowns. � 2017, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21100317746&tip=sid&clean=0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1464
dc.identifier.doiPubMed ID :
dc.identifier.issn9766006
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1464
dc.identifier.otherPubMed ID :
dc.identifier.urihttps://t.ly/1VVeB
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherJaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorld Journal of Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofseries8
dc.subjectAbutment intrusionen_US
dc.subjectCantilever bridgeen_US
dc.subjectDouble Akersen_US
dc.subjectTelescopic crownen_US
dc.titleComparison of different methods of abutment splinting and attachments on teeth kinetics (Part I)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.isReferencedByAbbas, N.A., (2008) Clinical Removable Partial Denture, 1St Ed, , Egypt: MSA University Press; Abbas, N.A., (2010) Removable Partial Denture Technology, 2Nd Ed, , Egypt: MSA University Press; Van Dalen, A., Feilzer, A.J., Kleverlaan, C.J., A literature review of two-unit cantilevered FPDs (2004) Int J Prosthodont, 17 (3), pp. 281-284; Langer, A., Telescope retainers for removable partial dentures (1981) J Prosthet Dent, 45 (1), pp. 37-43; Eliason, C.M., RPA clasp design for distal-extension removable partial dentures (1983) J Prosthet Dent, 49 (1), pp. 25-27; El-Wakad, M.T., (2008) Evaluation of Stresses and Displacement In Different Clasp-Retained Partial Dentures: In Vitro Study. Bio-Medical Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering, , Helwan, Egypt: Helwan University; Mizuuchi, W., Yatabe, M., Sato, M., Nishiyama, A., Ohyama, T., The effects of loading locations and direct retainers on the movements of the abutment tooth and denture base of removable partial dentures (2002) J Med Dent Sci, 49 (1), pp. 11-18; Aristizabal-Ochoa, J.D., Induced moments and lateral deflections in columns with initial imperfections and semi rigid connections: II. Verification and examples (2012) Dyna (Bilbao), 79, pp. 18-19; Henderson, D., Blevins, W.R., Wesley, R.C., Seward, T., The cantilever type of posterior fixed partial dentures: A laboratory study (1970) J Prosthet Dent, 24 (1), pp. 47-67; Himmel, R., Pilo, R., Assif, D., Aviv, I., The cantilever fixed partial denture�a literature review (1992) J Prosthet Dent, 67 (1), pp. 484-487; Ambaum, M.H., General relationships between pressure, weight and mass of a hydrostatic fluid (2008) Proc R Soc A, 464 (2092), pp. 943-950; Wenz, H.J., Hertrampf, K., Lehmann, K.M., Clinical longevity of removable partial dentures retained by telescopic crowns: Outcome of the double crown with clearance fit (2001) Int J Prosthodont, 14 (3), pp. 207-213; Shrestha, P., Shrestha, K., Telescopic crowns used as retainers for Kennedy class II removable partial dentures (2010) J Nep Dent Assoc, 11, pp. 159-161; Ben-Ur, Z., Aviv, I., Maharshak, B., Factors affecting displacement of free-end saddle removable partial dentures (1991) Quintessence Int, 22 (1), pp. 23-27; Carr, A.B., Brown, D.T., (2011) McCracken�s Removable Partial Denture, p. 105. , 12th ed. USA: El Sevier Mosby
dcterms.sourceScopus

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
avatar_scholar_128.png
Size:
2.73 KB
Format:
Portable Network Graphics
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison_of_Different_Methods_of_Abutment_Splint.pdf
Size:
1.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: