Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of MSAR
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "El-Mallah S."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Bond Strength and Solubility of a Novel Polydimethylsiloxane-Gutta-Percha Calcium Silicate-Containing Root Canal Sealer
    (Wroclaw Medical University, 2019) Khalil M.M.; Abdelrahman M.H.; El-Mallah S.; Department of Dental Biomaterials; Faculty of Dentistry; Fayoum University; Egypt; Department of Dental Biomaterials; Faculty of Dentistry; Modern Science and Arts University; Cairo; Egypt; Department of Endodontics; Faculty of Dentistry; Fayoum University; Egypt
    Background. Endodontic sealers are essential for sealing gutta-percha to the dentin walls. They help to ensure that the canal remains free of microorganisms which might lead to infection. In order to perform their intended function, the sealers should properly adhere to the dentin walls and remain insoluble when set in the canal. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength and solubility of a novel polydimethylsiloxane-gutta-percha calcium silicate-containing root canal sealer (GuttaFlow� bioseal) and compare it with the zinc oxide and eugenol sealer (Zical�). Material and methods. The endodontic sealers used in this study were GuttaFlow bioseal and Zical. The bond strength was assessed using push-out bond strength test in 3 root segments: coronal, middle and apical. The solubility was tested according to the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association (ANSI/ADA) specification No. 57 at 3 different time intervals: 1, 7 and 14 days. Results. The push-out bond strength in all root segments was significantly higher in Zical compared to GuttaFlow bioseal. The solubility was significantly higher on day 1 and 7 in Zical compared to GuttaFlow bioseal, and on day 14, the difference between them was not significant. Conclusions. Within the limitations of this study, the endodontic sealer GuttaFlow bioseal showed low bond strength values compared to Zical. The solubility of the set GuttaFlow bioseal and Zical were both within the recommended ANSI/ADA levels. � 2019 by Wroclaw Medical University.

October University for Modern Sciences and Arts Established by Dr. Nawal El Degwi in 1996 copyright © 2019-2024

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback