EFFECTIVENESS OF TWO UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES USING TWO DIFFERENT BONDING APPROACHES
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2018-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Type
Article
Publisher
EDJ
Series Info
EGYPTIAN DENTAL JOURNAL;Vol. 64, 575:588, January, 2018
Doi
Scientific Journal Rankings
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the resin-dentin micro-tensile bond
strength (μ-TBS) using 2 types of universal adhesives with etch-and-rinse and self-etch approaches
after 24 hours and 6 months of water storage.
Materials and Methods: A total of 20 extracted non-carious human molars were used in this
study. Teeth were equally and randomly divided into 2 groups (N= 10 teeth) according to the type
of adhesive used; Group I; Adhese® Universal and Group II; Single Bond Universal. Each group
was further subdivided into 2 equal subgroups (n=5 teeth) according to the bonding approach used;
Subgroup A; using the self-etch (SE) approach and Subgroup B; using the etch-and-rinse (ER)
approach. After bonding, each tooth was built up by resin composite, cut into sticks (0.9 mm x 0.9
mm) and stored in distilled water at 37˚C for 24 hours and 6 months. Then, each stick was stressed
under tension until failure using a simplified universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1
mm/min. Data were statistically analyzed using One-Way ANOVA, Two-Way ANOVA and Tukey
HSD Tests. After μ-TBS testing, all debonded surfaces were observed using a stereomicroscope at
50X magnification to determine the modes of failure, which were categorized as adhesive, cohesive
or mixed failure.
Results: After 24 hours of water storage, there was no significant difference between the μ-TBS
exhibited by Adhese Universal using both SE and ER approaches while both approaches differed
significantly when using Single Bond Universal (P=0.0003). Furthermore, there was no significant
difference when comparing the μ-TBS means of SE groups or ER groups of both adhesive systems.
After 6 months of water storage at 37˚C, there was a significant decrease in the μ-TBS values of
all groups (p<0.0001) except when Adhese Universal was used with SE approach, there was no
difference between the 24 h and the 6 month-groups (p=0.1449). The failure mode analysis was
consistent with the μ-TBS test results as the number of adhesive failures increased with decreased
bond strength values.
Conclusions: When bonding resin-based composite restoratives to dentin, a separate acid-
etching step is not required when using Adhese Universal, but it is preferred with Single Bond
Universal adhesive. Aging markedly contributes to bond degradation of universal adhesives.
Description
Keywords
water storage., fracture mode analysis., microtensile bond strength, self-etch, Universal adhesive, etch-and-rinse