JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
| dc.contributor.author | I. Ezzeldin, Naglaa | |
| dc.contributor.author | F. Mohamed, Mona | |
| dc.contributor.author | Abdou, Ahmed | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-22T08:33:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-02-22T08:33:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1 Castillo B, Borges D, Souza EJ, Catelan A, Alexandre L, Sartini M. Can extended photoactivation time of resin‑based fissure sealer materials improve ultimate tensile strength and decrease water sorption/solubility ? Eur J Dent 2012; 6:402–407. 2 Feigal R, Gooch B, Ismail A, Kohn W, Siegal M, Simonsen R. Evidence‑based clinical recommendations for the use of pit‑and‑fissure sealants. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139:257–268. 3 Lekic PC, Deng D, Brothwell D. Clinical evaluation of sealants and preventive resin restorations in a group of environmentally homogeneous children. J Dent Child 2006; 73:15–19. 4 Wright JT, Crall JJ, Fontana M, Gillette EJ, Novy BB, Dhar V, et al. Evidence‑based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit‑and‑fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2016; 147:672–682. 5 San‑Martin L, Ogunbodede EO, Kalenderian E. Review article. A 50‑year audit of published peer‑reviewed literature on pit and fi ssure. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71:1356–1361. 6 Govindaiah S, Bhoopathi V. Dentists’ levels of evidence‑based clinical knowledge and attitudes about using pit‑and‑fissure sealants. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145:849–855. 7 Wright JT, Tampi MP, Graham L, Estrich C, Crall JJ, Fontana M, et al. Sealants for preventing and arresting pit‑and‑fissure occlusal caries in primary and permanent molars. Pediatr Dent 2016; 38:282–294. 8 Martin L, Huertos-Marchante A, Galvan-Martos J, Rodriguez-Lozano FJ. Dental sealant knowledge, opinion, values and practice of Spanish dental hygienists. Int J Dent Hyg 2017; 15:46–52. 9 Lin TH, Hsieh TY, Horowitz AM, Chen KK, Lin SS, Lai YJ, et al. Knowledge and practices of caries prevention among Taiwanese dentists attending a national conference. J Dent Sci 2010; 5:229–236. 10 Folke BD, Walton JI, Feigal RJ. Occlusal sealant success over ten years in a private practice: comparing longevity of sealants placed by dentists, hygienists, and assistants. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26:426–432. 11 Archegas LRP, Caldas DBM, Rached RN, Vieira S, Souza EM. Sorption and solubility of composites cured with quartz-tungsten halogen and light emitting diode light‑curing units. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9:73–80. 12 Zanchi CH, Ogliari FA, Marques E, Silva R, Lund RG, Machado HH, et al. Effect of the silane concentration on the selected properties of an experimental microfilled composite resin. Appl Adhes Sci 2015; 27:1–9. 13 Petropoulou A, Vrochari AD, Hellwig E, Stampf S, Polydorou O. Water sorption and water solubility of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114:674–679. 14 Mortier E, Gerdolle DA, Jacquot B, Panighi MM. Importance of water sorption and solubility studies for couple bonding agent‑resin‑based filling material. Oper Dent 2004; 29:669–676. 15 Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater 2016; 7:1–15. 16 Lohbauer U. Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials? Properties, limitations and future trends. Materials (Basel) 2010; 3:76–96. 17 Konde S, Raj S, Kumar N, Bhat P. Moisture-tolerant resin-based sealant: a boon. Contemp Clin Dent 2013; 4:343–348. 18 Askarizadeh N, Heshmat H, Zangeneh N. One‑year clinical success of embrace hydrophilic and helioseal-f hydrophobic sealants in permanent first molars : a clinical trial. J Dent (Tehran) 2017; 14:92–99. 19 Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S. Evaluation of shear bond strength, penetration ability, microleakage and remineralisation capacity of glass ionomer-based fissure sealants. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2016; 17:17–23. 20 Bagheri R, Burrow MF. Comparison of the effect of storage media on hardness and shear punch strength of tooth-colored restorative materials. Am J Dent 2007; 20:329–334. 21 Hamouda IM. Effects of various beverages on hardness, roughness, and solubility of esthetic restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23:315–322. 22 Gajewski VE, Pfeifer CS, Fróes-Salgado NR, Boaro LC, Braga RR. Monomers used in resin composites : degree of conversion, mechanical properties and water sorption/solubility. Braz Dent J 2012; 23:508‑514. 23 Kane B, Karren J, Garcia-Godoy C, Garcia-Godoy F. Sealant adaptation and penetration into occlusal fissures. Am J Dent 2009; 22:89–91. 24 Ku J, Lee J, Ra J. In vitro evaluation of microleakage and penetration of hydrophilic sealants applied on dry and moist enamel. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2017; 44:272–279. 25 Schlueter N, Klimek J, Ganss C. Efficacy of a moisture‑tolerant material for fissure sealing: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17:711–716. 26 Ferraz I, Galo R, Nelson‑Filho P, Borsatto C. Bond strength of a bisphenol‑ a‑free fissure sealant with and without adhesive layer under conditions of saliva contamination. Braz Dent J 2016; 27:309–312. 27 Subramaniam P, Jayasurya S, Babu KLG. Evaluation of glass carbomer sealant and a moisture tolerant resin sealant. A comparative study. Int J Dent Sci Res 2015; 2:1–8. 28 Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Brener S, Crutchfield J, Larumbe J, Michaud C, et al. Twenty‑four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin‑based sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 2012; 143:115–122. 29 Abdelfattah M, Elmotayam KM, Elbardissy A. Clinical and laboratory assessment of a moisture tolerant, resin‑based pit and fissure sealant. Egypt Dent J 2013; 59:509–518. 30 Dinakaran S. Sorption and solubility characteristics of compomer, conventional and resin modified glass – ionomer immersed in various media. J Dent Med Sci 2014; 13:41–45. 31 Walton JI, Feigal RJ. ISO 4049. Dentistry – polymer‑based filling, restorative and luting materials. J Dent 2009; 37:7–13. 32 Sa’ada MM, Khattab NM, Ali AM. antibacterial activity of ginger extract on selected oral pat hogens (an antibacterial activity of ginger extract on selected oral pathogens). An in vitro study. Egypt Dent J 2016; 61:0–10. 33 Bayindir F, Kürklü D, Yanikoǧlu ND. The effect of staining solutions on the color stability of provisional prosthodontic materials. J Dent 2012; 40:41–46. 34 Gonulol N, Ozer S, Sen Tunc E. Water sorption, solubility, and color stability of giomer restoratives. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015; 27:300–306. 35 Johnston WM. Color measurement in dentistry. J Dent 2009; 37:2–6. 36 Azarpazhooh A, Main PA. Pit and fissure sealants in the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor) 2008; 74:171–177. 37 Tellez M, Gray Sl, Gray S, Lim S, Ismail Al. Sealants and dental caries: dentists’ perspectives on evidence‑based recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142:1033–1040. 38 Riley JI, Gordan VV, Rindal DB, Fellows JI, Ajmo CT, Amundson C et al. Preferences for caries prevention agents in adult patients: findings from the dental practice-based research network. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 2010; 38:360–370. 39 Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S, Bezerra AC, Leal SC. Caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin‑based fissure sealants on permanent teeth: a meta analysis. J Oral Sci 2009; 51:373–382. 40 Alirezaei M, Bagherian A, Shirazi AS. Glass ionomer cements as fissure sealing materials: yes or no?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2018; 149:640–649. [Downloaded free from http://www.tmj.eg.net on Saturday, February 22, 2020, IP: 41.128.185.34] Characters of two moisture tolerant sealants Ezzeldin et al. 87 41 Eliades A, Birpou E, Eliades T, Eliades G. Self-adhesive restoratives as pit and fissure sealants: a comparative laboratory study. Dent Mater 2013; 29:752–762. 42 Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho M, Yiu C, et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005; 26:6449–6459. 43 Bociong K, Szczesio A, Sokolowski K, Domarecka M, Sokolowski J, Krasowski M, et al. The influence of water sorption of dental light‑cured composites on shrinkage stress. Materials (Basel) 2017; 10:1–14. 44 Kawai K, Iwami Y, Ebisu S. Effect of resin monomer composition on toothbrush wear resistance. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25:264–268. 45 Santerre JP, Leung BW. Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001; 12:136–151. 46 Misilli T, Gönülol N. Water sorption and solubility of bulk‑fill composites polymerized with a third generation LED LCU. Braz Oral Res 2017; 31:1–8. 47 Gavranovi A, Ajanovi M, Kora S, Zukić S, Strujić‑Porović S, Kamber‑Ćesir A, et al. Evaluation of the water sorption of luting cements in different solutions. Acta Med Acad 2017; 46:124–132. 48 Giti R, Vojdani M, Abduo J, Bagheri R. The comparison of sorption and solubility behavior of four different resin luting cements in different storage media. J Dent (Shiraz, Iran) 2016; 17:91–97. 49 Ertaş E, Güler Au, Yücel Ac, Köprülü H, Güler E. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater J 2006; 25:371–376. 50 Kuşgöz A, Tüzüner T, Ulker M, Kemer B, Saray O. Conversion degree, microhardness, microleakage and fluoride release of different fissure sealants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2010; 3:594–599. 51 Markovic D, Petrovic B, Peric T, Miletic I, Andjelkovic S. The impact of fissure depth and enamel conditioning protocols on glass‑ionomer and resin‑based fissure sealant penetration. J Adhes Dent 2011; 13:171–178. 52 Simonsen RJ, Neal RC. A review of the clinical application and performance of pit and fissure sealants. Aust Dent J 2011; 56:45–58. 53 Poggio C, Andenna G, Ceci M, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Cucca L. Fluoride release and uptake abilities of different fissure sealants. J Clin Exp Dent 2016; 8:284–209. 54 Alsaffar A, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Beiraghi S. Protective effect of pit and fissure sealants on demineralization of adjacent enamel. Pediatr Dent 2011; 33:491–495. 55 Fukazawa M, Matsuya S, Yamane M. The mechanism for erosion of glass-ionomer cements in organic-acid buffer solutions. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1175–1179. 56 Potin-Gautier M, Dupuis V, Castetbon A, Moya F. Solubility and disintegration of a glass ionomer cement. Chem Spec Bioavailab 1997; 9:95–99. 57 Neelakantan P, John S, Anand S, Sureshbabu N, Subbarao C. Fluoride release from a new glass‑ionomer cement. Oper Dent 2011; 36:80–85. 58 Markovic DL, Petrovic BB, Peric TO. Fluoride content and recharge ability of five glassionomer dental materials. BMC Oral Health 2008; 8:1–9. 59 Attar N, Turgut MD. Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoride‑releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2003; 28:395–402. 60 Qi W, Malone MF. Semibatch reactive distillation for isopropyl acetate synthesis. Ind Eng Chem Res 2011; 50:1272–1277. 61 Kakuda S, Sidhu SK, Sano H. Buffering or non-buffering; an action of pit‑and‑fissure sealants. J Dent 2015; 43:1285–1289. 62 Cornea D, Silaghi-Dumitrescu L, Balazsi R, Oprean R, Dudea D, Moldovan M. The study of pit and fissure sealants concerning water sorption and solubility. Stud Univ Babes‑Bolyai Chem 2016; 61:239–248. 63 Lima R, Farias F, Andrade A, SilvaA, Duarte R. Water sorption and solubility of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment considering the time and the pH of the storage solution. Rev Gaúch Odonto 2018; 66:29–34. 64 Mousavinasab SM, Meyers I. Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and giomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2009; 6:75–81. 65 Hammouda IM, Alwakeel EE. Effect of water storage on fluoride release and mechanical properties of a polyacid‑modified composite resin (compomer). J Biomed Res 2011; 25:254–258. 66 Feldman M, Barnett C. Relationships between the acidity and osmolality of popular beverages and reported postprandial heartburn. Gastroenterology 1995; 108:125–131. 67 Gondim BLC, Medeiros IC, Costa BP, Carlo HL, Santos RL, Carvalho FG. Effects of erosive challenge on the morphology and surface properties of luting cements. Rev Odontol da UNESP 2016; 45:103–109. 68 Nicholson JW. The physics of water sorption by resin‑modified glass‑ionomer dental cements. J Mater Sci Med 1997; 8:691–695. 69 Arregui M. Six-month color change and water sorption of 9 new-generation flowable composites in 6 staining solutions. Braz Oral Res 2016; 30:1–12. 70 Aldharrab A. Effect of energy drinks on the color stability of nanofilled composite resin. J Conter Dent Pract 2013; 14:704–711. 71 Sano MFH. Change of color and translucency by light curing in resin composites. Oper Dent 2006; 31:598–603. 72 Prakki A, Cilli R, Francisco R, Mondelli L, Pereira C, Kalachandra S. Influence of pH environment on polymer based dental material properties. J Dent 2005; 33:91–98. 73 Tekçe N. The effect of different drinks on the color stability of different restorative materials after one month. Restor Dent Endod 2015; 40:255–261. 74 Moon J, Son S, Jung K, Kwon Y, Park J. Effect of immersion into solutions at various pH on the color stability of composite resins with different shades. Restor Dent Endod 2015; 40:270–275. 75 Ahmed K, Sajjan G. Color stability of ionomer and resin composite restoratives in various environmental solutions: an invitro reflection spectrophotometric study. J Conserv Dent 2005; 8:45–51. 76 Salgado VE, Cavalcante LM, Moraes RR, Davis HB, Ferracane JL, Schneider LF. Degradation of optical and surface properties of resin-based composites with distinct nanoparticle sizes but equivalent surface area. J Dent 2017; 59:48–53. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_9_19 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://t.ly/ndLKx | |
| dc.description | MSA Google Scholar | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective This study aimed to evaluate and compare between four physical variables (sorption, solubility, color change and fluoride release) for glass ionomer (GI) sealant against moisture tolerant resin sealant in solutions with different pH in different time intervals. Materials and methods Thirty discs were prepared from GI Fuji Triage and Embrace WetBond (EWB) resin sealant. Sorption, solubility and color change were measured after different time intervals (1 day, 1 week, and 1 month) of immersion of the specimens in different solution having different pH. In addition 10 disks were assessed for fluoride release of both sealants after being immersed in distilled water. Results EWB showed greater sorption in all media after 1 day and 1 week. GI sealant showed highest water sorption after 1 week and this sorption decreased again after 1 month. GI showed greater initial solubility in Pepsi and water after 1 day (P = 0.016). Pepsi showed higher solubility for EWB while no significant effect was found for GI with different media. The color change was greater for EWB when immersed in Pepsi and ginger. After 1-month storage, the color change was the highest specially for Pepsi for both sealants. Fluoride release was greater for GI compared to EWB. Conclusion Both sealants showed different physical performance depending on the type of immersion media and time period. This is expected to affect their mechanical properties and hence their clinical performance | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Medknow Publications | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Medknow Publications | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Tanta Dental Journal;Volume: 16 Issue: 2 Pages: 80-87 | |
| dc.subject | University of dental caries, Embrace WetBond, glass ionomer, pit and fissure sealants, solubility | en_US |
| dc.title | Physical characteristics of two moisture tolerant fissure sealants immersed in commercial products with different pH range | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_9_19 | |
| dc.Affiliation | October University for modern sciences and Arts (MSA) |
