Shehata, L.MGabr, H.SAlsadaty, A.H2020-06-142020-06-1406/03/2020Carmona, M. The Place-shaping Continuum: A Theory of Urban Design Process (Open Access) (2014) Journal of Urban Design, 19 (1), pp. 2-36. Cited 93 times. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2013.854695 View at Publisher 2 Inam, A. Meaningful urban design: Teleological/catalytic/relevant (2002) Journal of Urban Design, 7 (1), pp. 35-58. Cited 44 times. doi: 10.1080/13574800220129222 View at Publisher 3 Carmona, M. (2010) Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Cited 795 times. Routledge 4 Zeisel, J. (1984) Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behaviour Research. Cited 329 times. Cup Archive 5 Lang, J.T. (2005) Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products. Cited 112 times. Routledge 6 Yeang, L.D. (2000) Urban Design Compendium. Cited 167 times. English Partnerships/Housing Corporation, London 7 Schmidt, S., Nemeth, J., Botsford, E. The evolution of privately owned public spaces in New York City (2011) Urban Design International, 16 (4), pp. 270-284. Cited 17 times. doi: 10.1057/udi.2011.12 View at Publisher 8 Zakariya, K., Harun, N.Z., Mansor, M. Spatial Characteristics of Urban Square and Sociability: A Review of the City Square, Melbourne (2014) Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, pp. 678-688. Cited 5 times. 9 Spaces, P.F.P. "What Makes A Successful Place? (2009) Project for Public Spaces 10 Kayden, J.S. (2000) New York City Department of City Planning, Municipal Art Society of New York. Privately Owned Public Space: the New York City Experience. Cited 13 times. Wiley, New York, 11 Wanas, A.F., Moustafa, Y.M., Murshed, S.M. Social cohesion in Cairo: Toward a better understanding of the potential role of urban design (2014) Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 61 (1), pp. 1-23. Cited 3 times. http://www.journals.eng.cu.edu.eg/ 12 Varna, G.M. (2011) Assessing the Publicness of Public Places: Towards a New Model. Cited 2 times. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Glasgow 13 Muminovic, M. Places as Assemblages: Paradigm Shift or Fashionable Nonsense? (2015) Athens Journal of Architecture, 1 (4), pp. 295-309. Cited 3 times. 14 Delanda, M. (2013) Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. Cited 659 times. A and C Black 15 Dovey, K. Becoming Places: Urbanism / Architecture / Identity / Power (2009) Becoming Places: Urbanism / Architecture / Identity / Power, pp. 1-201. Cited 127 times. http://www.taylorandfrancis.com/books/details/9780203875001 ISBN: 0203875001; 978-020387500-1 doi: 10.4324/9780203875001 View at Publisher 16 Delanda, M. (2006) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Cited 1549 times. A and C Black11101903https://t.ly/uOIgSCOPUSThis paper presents an attempt to construct a conceptual tool for urban designers, architects, and landscape architects to use for developing an analytical guideline model for redevelopment of sociable public open spaces in contemporary cities. The construction of the conceptual tool is developed based on the integration between the continuum place-shaping process and the qualities of sociability in public open spaces as a direct outcome of such process; an issue that has been omitted by most post-occupancy review of urban design projects. Consequently, the theoretical knowledge of this paper is constructed based on readings and pertinent research studies of place-shaping process, place sociability and place phenomenon that are relevant to the research problem. The theoretical foundation of thoughts and concepts are combined to create a conceptual tool to understand place-shaping of sociable public places as a real assemblage. This conceptual tool is put forward as a positive step for establishing analytical guideline models for redevelopment of sociable public spaces. This tool can also be used as a comprehensive evaluation method based on the integration between place-shaping process and places that are in a changeable emergence state over timeen-USConceptual toolPlace assemblagePlace-shaping processsociabilityComprehensive evaluationArticle