Agag, GomaaDurrani, Baseer AliShehawy, Yasser MoustafaAlharthi, MajedAlamoudi, HawazenEl-Halaby, SherifHassanein, AhmedAbdelmoety, Ziad H.2023-03-142023-03-142023-03https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103301https://tinyurl.com/2m34mwztPractitioners utilise customer feedback metrics (CFM’s) to monitor business performance. However, the influence of CFM’s on firm performance has been ignored. Thus, this paper aims to examine the effects of CFM’s on firm performance. Our study collected data about CFM’s, marketing efforts, and financial performance over the period 2005–2020 from American Customer Satisfaction Index. The present study used a multiple regression panel analysis to investigate the influence of different CFMs (i.e., SAT, Top-2-Box, NPS proportion, NPS value, and CES) on firm performance (i.e., gross margin, sales growth, and Tobin’s Q), moderating by operating environment factors (i.e., munificence, power, and dynamism). Our results revealed that Top-2-box is the best predictor CFM’s to compare firms in online booking, hotels, and online shopping industries, while consumer satisfaction is the best predictor for electronic and fixed telecom industries. CES is the best CFM’s to compare companies in res- taurants industries. Moreover, NPS is the best metric to compare different companies in holiday parks industries. The results provide considerable managerial implications for effective use of resources regarding investing in most suitable CFM’s to enhance firm performance.en-USConsumer feedback metricsNet promoter scoresConsumer satisfactionCustomer effort scoreMarketing effortsFinancial performanceArticlehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103301