Mohsen, RehamB Thorne, JoannaD. Alexander, BruceJ. Snowden, Martin2020-02-292020-02-2920141. C. Alarco, T Farhan, V. Osborne, W. Huckb and C. Alexander. Bioadhesion at micro-patterned stimuli-responsive polymer brushes. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2005:15:2089–94. 2. S. Burkert E. Bittrich, M. Kuntzsch, M. Muller, K. Eichhorn, C. Bellmann, P. Uhlmann and M. Stamm. Protein Resistance of PNIPAAm Brushes: Application to Switchable Protein Adsorption. Langmuir. 2010:26:1786–95. 3. L. Qin, X. He, W. Zhang, W. Li and Y. Zhang. Macroporous thermosensitive imprinted hydrogel for recognition of protein by metal coordinate interaction. Anal Chem. 2009:81:7206–16. 4. K. Nagase, J. Kobayashi, and T. Okano. Temperature-responsive intelligent interfaces for biomolecular separation and cell sheet engineering. J R Soc Interface. 2009:6:S293–S309. 5. H. Kanazawa, M. Nishikawa, A. Mizutani, C. Sakamoto, Y. Morita-Murase, Y. Nagata, A. Kikuchi and T. Okano. Aqueous chromatographic system for separation of biomolecules using thermoresponsive polymer modified stationary phase. Journal of Chromatography A. 2008;1191:157-61. 6. E. Ayano, K. Nambu, C. Sakamoto, H. Kanazawa, A. Kikuchi, T. Okano. Aqueous chromatography system using pHand temperature-responsive stationary phase with ion-exchange groups. Journal of Chromatography A. 2006:1119:58-65. 7. E. Wischerhoff, N Badi, A. Laschewsky and J. Lutz. Smart polymer surfaces: concepts and applications in biosciences. Advanced Polymer Science. 2011:240:1-33. 8. J. Edahiro, K. Sumaru, Y. Tada, K. Ohi, T. Takagi, M. Kameda, T. Shinbo, T. Kanamori and Y. Yoshimi. In situ control of cell adhesion using photoresponsive culture surface. Biomacromolecules. 2005: 6:970-4. 9. T. Singh and S. Mitra. Interaction of cinnamic acid derivatives with serum albumins: A fluorescence spectroscopic study. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2011:78:942–8. 10. J. Min, X. Meng-Xia, Z. Dong, L. Yuan, L. Xiao-Yu and C. Xing. Spectroscopic studies on the interaction of cinnamic acid and its hydroxyl derivatives with human serum albumin. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2004:692:71–80. 11. R. Mohsen, G. Vine, N. Majcen, B. Alexander and M. Snowden. Characterization of thermo and pH responsive NIPAM based microgels and their membrane blocking potential. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2013:428:53-9. 12. J. Torres. Designing dual thermoresponsive & photoresponsive materials for biomedical applications: McMaster University: 2011. 13. C.Appel, L. Ma, R. Rhue, E. Kennelley. Point of zero charge determination in soils and minerals via traditional methods and detection of electroacoustic mobility. Geoderma. 2003:113:77– 93. 14. A. Takehara and S. Fukuzaki. Effect of the Surface Charge of Stainless Steel on Adsorption Behavior of Pectin Biocontrol Science. 2002:7:9-15. 15. B. Arkles. Hydrophobicity, Hydrophilicity and Silanes. Paint & Coatings Industry magazine. 2006. 16. K. Osborne. TemperatureDependence of the Contact Angle of Water on Graphite, Silicon, and Gold. Worcester Worcester Polytechnic Institute: 2009. 17. A. Sumner E. Menke, Y. Dubowski, J. Newberg, T. Brauners, B. Finlayson-Pitts. The nature of water on surfaces of laboratory systems and implications for heterogeneous chemistry in the troposphere. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2004:6:604–613. 18. Y. Tanaka, H. Saito, Y. Tsutsumi, H. Doi, H. Imai and T. Hanawa. Active Hydroxyl Groups on Surface Oxide Film of Titanium, 316L Stainless Steel, and CobaltChromium-Molybdenum Alloy and Its Effect on the Immobilization of Poly(Ethylene Glycol). Materials Transactions. 2008:49:805-11. 19. R. Sabia and L. Ukrainczyk. Surface chemistry of SiO2 and TiO2±SiO2 glasses as determined by titration of soot particles. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2000:277:1-9. 20. S. Behrens and D. Grier. The Charge of Glass and Silica Surfaces. 2008. 21. H. Churchill, H. Teng and R. Hazen. Correlation of pH-dependent surface interaction forces to amino acid adsorption: implications for the origin of life. American Mineralogist. 2004:89:1048–55. 22. J. Thorne, G. Vine, M. Snowden. Microgel applications and commercial considerations. Colloid Polym Sci. 2011: 289:629-646. 23. D. Barten, J. Kleijn and M Cohen Stuart. Adsorption of a linear polyelectrolyte on a gold electrode. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2003:5:4258–64. 24. R. Amaral and L. Chong. Surface Roughness, 2002.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.05.050https://t.ly/6xBrzMSA Google ScholarRecently, responsive surfaces have attracted attention due to their potential applications. Reported research have studied the deposition of environmentally responsive particles on different surfaces, qualitatively tested their response to environmental conditions and studied their possible applications. In this work, novel fluorescent temperature-sensitive nanoparticles were synthesized using a surfactant free emulsion polymerization technique: poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-5% vinyl cinnamate) (p(NIPAM)5%VC). The new particles were characterized using dynamic light scattering and fluorescence spectroscopy. A novel sensitive method for the quantitative analysis of p(NIPAM) 5% VC using fluorescence spectroscopy was developed to determine the concentration of nanoparticle dispersions. This was further used to quantitatively determine the mass of nanoparticles deposited per unit area of glass pre-treated with acid, glass pre-treated with base, quartz, stainless steel, gold and teflon at 25 °C and 60 °C. Factors affecting the adsorption/desorption of the nanoparticles were studied, including the effect of substrate surface charge, surface roughness (using atomic force microscopy, AFM), hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity and the temperature at which the adsorption/desorption experiments were carried out. The results show that the effect of surface charge is the most significant, followed by that of surface roughness and temperature. Meanwhile, the influence of the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity of the surface on the adsorption/desorption of nanoparticles appears to be far less significant than the previously mentioned factors.enFluorescent p(NIPAM)Vinyl cinnamateQuantitative particle depositionSurface charge and surface roughnessDeposition of fluorescent NIPAM-based nanoparticles on solid surfaces: quantitative analysis and the factors affecting itArticlehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.05.050